[danthedart]

We have a family business that owns few apartment complexes in the North Park Hillcrest area. Our operating costs are generally in line with the 45% statistic. The 45% statistic is from the annual income expense analysis put out by the Institute of Real Estate Management and National Apartment Association.

Perhaps you haven’t had any vacancies for awhile? Perhaps there haven’t been any repairs for awhile? Do you hire someone to manage the property or are you managing it yourself?

[danthedart]

Historically the cost of operating a rental unit is 45%. So in order to rent out a home for a profit each month, 55% of rent needs to cover your mortgage plus taxes.

In otherwords, its very difficult for a SFR to be cash flow positive.

[danthedart]

Historically the cost of operating a rental unit is 45%. So in order to rent out a home for a profit each month, 55% of rent needs to cover your mortgage plus taxes.

In otherwords, its very difficult for a SFR to be cash flow positive.

[danthedart]

Historically the cost of operating a rental unit is 45%. So in order to rent out a home for a profit each month, 55% of rent needs to cover your mortgage plus taxes.

In otherwords, its very difficult for a SFR to be cash flow positive.

[danthedart]

Historically the cost of operating a rental unit is 45%. So in order to rent out a home for a profit each month, 55% of rent needs to cover your mortgage plus taxes.

In otherwords, its very difficult for a SFR to be cash flow positive.

[danthedart]

Historically the cost of operating a rental unit is 45%. So in order to rent out a home for a profit each month, 55% of rent needs to cover your mortgage plus taxes.

In otherwords, its very difficult for a SFR to be cash flow positive.

[danthedart]

[quote=ltokuda]Behind wall street’s exterior is a huge con game: Gain people’s confidence and use their money to create short term profit at the expense of long term risk. Guys like Cramer and many of the other “experts” you see on TV know that its a con game. In fact they’re an important part of keeping the con going. And when it all blows up, they do their best to act surprised: “It had a one in a million chance of happening” … “This is a once in lifetime event”, etc. But as Michael Lewis points out, this con game has been going on for a very long time. A lot of people know about it. The only question is “Why isn’t it public knowledge?”.[/quote]

I understand that a lot of people have been conned and you are really upset about these “used car salesmen.” It’s understandable really. I’m upset too.

Cramer and his cohorts at CNBC has lost a lot of money in stocks too. Yes they were used car salesmen, and they were wrong, but they bought their own melons. They’re like the realtors all over the country that sold people overpriced homes. I’m not angry at the realtors, because they bought into it too. A lot of realtors are upside down in their own homes.

Most of the population bought into all of it INCLUDING Cramer. Cramer even said numerous times to sell. Stewart doesn’t give him ANY credit for that. Why not? Cramer makes buy and sell predictions all the time. Cramer even said to take out all the money you need in the next 5 years. Did Stewart give him credit for that? Nope. Cramer was wrong, but he was not trying to dupe anybody.

If Stewart wants to go after Santelli, and Santelli doesn’t want to come on the air, it’s irresponsible to provoke an attack against the entire network and against hosts that have nothing to do with Santelli.

It’s understandable that you are upset. I feel for you and others who have lost a lot of money in the stock market. Let’s just punish the real people who need to be punished. Let’s punish the true criminals.

[danthedart]

[quote=ltokuda]Behind wall street’s exterior is a huge con game: Gain people’s confidence and use their money to create short term profit at the expense of long term risk. Guys like Cramer and many of the other “experts” you see on TV know that its a con game. In fact they’re an important part of keeping the con going. And when it all blows up, they do their best to act surprised: “It had a one in a million chance of happening” … “This is a once in lifetime event”, etc. But as Michael Lewis points out, this con game has been going on for a very long time. A lot of people know about it. The only question is “Why isn’t it public knowledge?”.[/quote]

I understand that a lot of people have been conned and you are really upset about these “used car salesmen.” It’s understandable really. I’m upset too.

Cramer and his cohorts at CNBC has lost a lot of money in stocks too. Yes they were used car salesmen, and they were wrong, but they bought their own melons. They’re like the realtors all over the country that sold people overpriced homes. I’m not angry at the realtors, because they bought into it too. A lot of realtors are upside down in their own homes.

Most of the population bought into all of it INCLUDING Cramer. Cramer even said numerous times to sell. Stewart doesn’t give him ANY credit for that. Why not? Cramer makes buy and sell predictions all the time. Cramer even said to take out all the money you need in the next 5 years. Did Stewart give him credit for that? Nope. Cramer was wrong, but he was not trying to dupe anybody.

If Stewart wants to go after Santelli, and Santelli doesn’t want to come on the air, it’s irresponsible to provoke an attack against the entire network and against hosts that have nothing to do with Santelli.

It’s understandable that you are upset. I feel for you and others who have lost a lot of money in the stock market. Let’s just punish the real people who need to be punished. Let’s punish the true criminals.

[danthedart]

[quote=ltokuda]Behind wall street’s exterior is a huge con game: Gain people’s confidence and use their money to create short term profit at the expense of long term risk. Guys like Cramer and many of the other “experts” you see on TV know that its a con game. In fact they’re an important part of keeping the con going. And when it all blows up, they do their best to act surprised: “It had a one in a million chance of happening” … “This is a once in lifetime event”, etc. But as Michael Lewis points out, this con game has been going on for a very long time. A lot of people know about it. The only question is “Why isn’t it public knowledge?”.[/quote]

I understand that a lot of people have been conned and you are really upset about these “used car salesmen.” It’s understandable really. I’m upset too.

Cramer and his cohorts at CNBC has lost a lot of money in stocks too. Yes they were used car salesmen, and they were wrong, but they bought their own melons. They’re like the realtors all over the country that sold people overpriced homes. I’m not angry at the realtors, because they bought into it too. A lot of realtors are upside down in their own homes.

Most of the population bought into all of it INCLUDING Cramer. Cramer even said numerous times to sell. Stewart doesn’t give him ANY credit for that. Why not? Cramer makes buy and sell predictions all the time. Cramer even said to take out all the money you need in the next 5 years. Did Stewart give him credit for that? Nope. Cramer was wrong, but he was not trying to dupe anybody.

If Stewart wants to go after Santelli, and Santelli doesn’t want to come on the air, it’s irresponsible to provoke an attack against the entire network and against hosts that have nothing to do with Santelli.

It’s understandable that you are upset. I feel for you and others who have lost a lot of money in the stock market. Let’s just punish the real people who need to be punished. Let’s punish the true criminals.

[danthedart]

[quote=ltokuda]Behind wall street’s exterior is a huge con game: Gain people’s confidence and use their money to create short term profit at the expense of long term risk. Guys like Cramer and many of the other “experts” you see on TV know that its a con game. In fact they’re an important part of keeping the con going. And when it all blows up, they do their best to act surprised: “It had a one in a million chance of happening” … “This is a once in lifetime event”, etc. But as Michael Lewis points out, this con game has been going on for a very long time. A lot of people know about it. The only question is “Why isn’t it public knowledge?”.[/quote]

I understand that a lot of people have been conned and you are really upset about these “used car salesmen.” It’s understandable really. I’m upset too.

Cramer and his cohorts at CNBC has lost a lot of money in stocks too. Yes they were used car salesmen, and they were wrong, but they bought their own melons. They’re like the realtors all over the country that sold people overpriced homes. I’m not angry at the realtors, because they bought into it too. A lot of realtors are upside down in their own homes.

Most of the population bought into all of it INCLUDING Cramer. Cramer even said numerous times to sell. Stewart doesn’t give him ANY credit for that. Why not? Cramer makes buy and sell predictions all the time. Cramer even said to take out all the money you need in the next 5 years. Did Stewart give him credit for that? Nope. Cramer was wrong, but he was not trying to dupe anybody.

If Stewart wants to go after Santelli, and Santelli doesn’t want to come on the air, it’s irresponsible to provoke an attack against the entire network and against hosts that have nothing to do with Santelli.

It’s understandable that you are upset. I feel for you and others who have lost a lot of money in the stock market. Let’s just punish the real people who need to be punished. Let’s punish the true criminals.

[danthedart]

[quote=ltokuda]Behind wall street’s exterior is a huge con game: Gain people’s confidence and use their money to create short term profit at the expense of long term risk. Guys like Cramer and many of the other “experts” you see on TV know that its a con game. In fact they’re an important part of keeping the con going. And when it all blows up, they do their best to act surprised: “It had a one in a million chance of happening” … “This is a once in lifetime event”, etc. But as Michael Lewis points out, this con game has been going on for a very long time. A lot of people know about it. The only question is “Why isn’t it public knowledge?”.[/quote]

I understand that a lot of people have been conned and you are really upset about these “used car salesmen.” It’s understandable really. I’m upset too.

Cramer and his cohorts at CNBC has lost a lot of money in stocks too. Yes they were used car salesmen, and they were wrong, but they bought their own melons. They’re like the realtors all over the country that sold people overpriced homes. I’m not angry at the realtors, because they bought into it too. A lot of realtors are upside down in their own homes.

Most of the population bought into all of it INCLUDING Cramer. Cramer even said numerous times to sell. Stewart doesn’t give him ANY credit for that. Why not? Cramer makes buy and sell predictions all the time. Cramer even said to take out all the money you need in the next 5 years. Did Stewart give him credit for that? Nope. Cramer was wrong, but he was not trying to dupe anybody.

If Stewart wants to go after Santelli, and Santelli doesn’t want to come on the air, it’s irresponsible to provoke an attack against the entire network and against hosts that have nothing to do with Santelli.

It’s understandable that you are upset. I feel for you and others who have lost a lot of money in the stock market. Let’s just punish the real people who need to be punished. Let’s punish the true criminals.

[danthedart]

[quote=ltokuda][quote=danthedart]Nope not intentionally misrepresenting his views. Don’t be stupid. Use some analysis. Actually listen to what Cramer is saying and actually listen to what Stewart is saying. Stewart does not make a critical argument. Don’t worship the guy just because he’s funny. He’s playing to the audience’s desire for a lynching. He scapegoats Cramer for ratings.

You think I’m going to take a lynching seriously?

Just look how Stewart is destroying the level of intellectual conversation in this country. [/quote]

Others have already exlpained what Stewart’s main premise was and why it has merit. However, since you’re determined to intentionally miss Stewart’s main premise, the debate is pointless.[/quote]

Yup the debate is pointless if you’re not willing to do analysis. I’ve already explained time and time again why Stewart’s “premise” and his anger is completely misplaced. You seem to share his anger and are not willing to critically self examine the situation. If that’s the case. Yes it is pointless. You want to lynch someone and no amount of reasoning is going to convince you otherwise.

[danthedart]

[quote=ltokuda][quote=danthedart]Nope not intentionally misrepresenting his views. Don’t be stupid. Use some analysis. Actually listen to what Cramer is saying and actually listen to what Stewart is saying. Stewart does not make a critical argument. Don’t worship the guy just because he’s funny. He’s playing to the audience’s desire for a lynching. He scapegoats Cramer for ratings.

You think I’m going to take a lynching seriously?

Just look how Stewart is destroying the level of intellectual conversation in this country. [/quote]

Others have already exlpained what Stewart’s main premise was and why it has merit. However, since you’re determined to intentionally miss Stewart’s main premise, the debate is pointless.[/quote]

Yup the debate is pointless if you’re not willing to do analysis. I’ve already explained time and time again why Stewart’s “premise” and his anger is completely misplaced. You seem to share his anger and are not willing to critically self examine the situation. If that’s the case. Yes it is pointless. You want to lynch someone and no amount of reasoning is going to convince you otherwise.

[danthedart]

[quote=ltokuda][quote=danthedart]Nope not intentionally misrepresenting his views. Don’t be stupid. Use some analysis. Actually listen to what Cramer is saying and actually listen to what Stewart is saying. Stewart does not make a critical argument. Don’t worship the guy just because he’s funny. He’s playing to the audience’s desire for a lynching. He scapegoats Cramer for ratings.

You think I’m going to take a lynching seriously?

Just look how Stewart is destroying the level of intellectual conversation in this country. [/quote]

Others have already exlpained what Stewart’s main premise was and why it has merit. However, since you’re determined to intentionally miss Stewart’s main premise, the debate is pointless.[/quote]

Yup the debate is pointless if you’re not willing to do analysis. I’ve already explained time and time again why Stewart’s “premise” and his anger is completely misplaced. You seem to share his anger and are not willing to critically self examine the situation. If that’s the case. Yes it is pointless. You want to lynch someone and no amount of reasoning is going to convince you otherwise.

[danthedart]

[quote=ltokuda][quote=danthedart]Nope not intentionally misrepresenting his views. Don’t be stupid. Use some analysis. Actually listen to what Cramer is saying and actually listen to what Stewart is saying. Stewart does not make a critical argument. Don’t worship the guy just because he’s funny. He’s playing to the audience’s desire for a lynching. He scapegoats Cramer for ratings.

You think I’m going to take a lynching seriously?

Just look how Stewart is destroying the level of intellectual conversation in this country. [/quote]

Others have already exlpained what Stewart’s main premise was and why it has merit. However, since you’re determined to intentionally miss Stewart’s main premise, the debate is pointless.[/quote]

Yup the debate is pointless if you’re not willing to do analysis. I’ve already explained time and time again why Stewart’s “premise” and his anger is completely misplaced. You seem to share his anger and are not willing to critically self examine the situation. If that’s the case. Yes it is pointless. You want to lynch someone and no amount of reasoning is going to convince you otherwise.

[Author]

Posts