Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Cube
ParticipantMy wife is a teacher for an on-line high school. As a teacher, she generally likes it. She does caution, though, “I do not believe on-line school is for everyone.”
From my perspective, I see it benefiting / suffering from the typical distance learning characteristics. The socialization situation would be very different from that of a brick and mortar school (for better or worse; the cynic in me considers conventional K-12 education to be a form of day-prison for the young…).
I’m happy to answer any questions you might have. My daughter isn’t even in school yet, but I could see us considering it. It may also pair well with folks who want to home school, but don’t have the breadth/depth necessary to provide a complete K-12 education.
ParticipantIf the hypothetical goal here is to have person A effectively buy person X a house, why ever foreclose or forgive the loan? Why not just have person X be in default to person A indefinitely? In fact, why not have person X pay the interest-only amount to person A (while falling in arrears on the full payment) and write of the payments against taxable income? And person A can probably gift most / all of that money back to person X (assuming spouses for each are playing too).
ParticipantIf the hypothetical goal here is to have person A effectively buy person X a house, why ever foreclose or forgive the loan? Why not just have person X be in default to person A indefinitely? In fact, why not have person X pay the interest-only amount to person A (while falling in arrears on the full payment) and write of the payments against taxable income? And person A can probably gift most / all of that money back to person X (assuming spouses for each are playing too).
ParticipantIf the hypothetical goal here is to have person A effectively buy person X a house, why ever foreclose or forgive the loan? Why not just have person X be in default to person A indefinitely? In fact, why not have person X pay the interest-only amount to person A (while falling in arrears on the full payment) and write of the payments against taxable income? And person A can probably gift most / all of that money back to person X (assuming spouses for each are playing too).
ParticipantIf the hypothetical goal here is to have person A effectively buy person X a house, why ever foreclose or forgive the loan? Why not just have person X be in default to person A indefinitely? In fact, why not have person X pay the interest-only amount to person A (while falling in arrears on the full payment) and write of the payments against taxable income? And person A can probably gift most / all of that money back to person X (assuming spouses for each are playing too).
ParticipantIf the hypothetical goal here is to have person A effectively buy person X a house, why ever foreclose or forgive the loan? Why not just have person X be in default to person A indefinitely? In fact, why not have person X pay the interest-only amount to person A (while falling in arrears on the full payment) and write of the payments against taxable income? And person A can probably gift most / all of that money back to person X (assuming spouses for each are playing too).
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]… The vast majority of buyers in the San Dieguito school district arent sitting around saying if Escondido drops another 100K I’m there. [/quote]
Surely at some price drop this would be true. With the savings, they could send their kids to private school.
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]… The vast majority of buyers in the San Dieguito school district arent sitting around saying if Escondido drops another 100K I’m there. [/quote]
Surely at some price drop this would be true. With the savings, they could send their kids to private school.
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]… The vast majority of buyers in the San Dieguito school district arent sitting around saying if Escondido drops another 100K I’m there. [/quote]
Surely at some price drop this would be true. With the savings, they could send their kids to private school.
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]… The vast majority of buyers in the San Dieguito school district arent sitting around saying if Escondido drops another 100K I’m there. [/quote]
Surely at some price drop this would be true. With the savings, they could send their kids to private school.
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]… The vast majority of buyers in the San Dieguito school district arent sitting around saying if Escondido drops another 100K I’m there. [/quote]
Surely at some price drop this would be true. With the savings, they could send their kids to private school.
Participant[quote=Sandi Egan][quote=SD Transplant]If convicted, she faces a maximum term of 19 years in state prison[/quote]
Right. $60K was not enough, so now we are stuck with paying all her bills for another 19 years. That’s the way to amend the state budget.[/quote]Right. And, I’m betting it would be waaaaay cheaper to just keep her on welfare for 19 years than to prosecute and incarcerate her.
Participant[quote=Sandi Egan][quote=SD Transplant]If convicted, she faces a maximum term of 19 years in state prison[/quote]
Right. $60K was not enough, so now we are stuck with paying all her bills for another 19 years. That’s the way to amend the state budget.[/quote]Right. And, I’m betting it would be waaaaay cheaper to just keep her on welfare for 19 years than to prosecute and incarcerate her.
Participant[quote=Sandi Egan][quote=SD Transplant]If convicted, she faces a maximum term of 19 years in state prison[/quote]
Right. $60K was not enough, so now we are stuck with paying all her bills for another 19 years. That’s the way to amend the state budget.[/quote]Right. And, I’m betting it would be waaaaay cheaper to just keep her on welfare for 19 years than to prosecute and incarcerate her.
-
AuthorPosts