Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
CDMA ENG
ParticipantI would also be interested in hearing about his “new” ideals. McCain has a huge following and I ,for one, was willing to vote for a democratic president but it was neither of the big two. Every time I see that stupid sticker that says “hope” I cringe. What does he offer that earn that title? Please explain it to me.
Everytime I hear McCain is the next Bush it makes me cringe. Are these the only two platforms that he is running on? Hope and McCain = Bush. Please explain with a valid arguement and I will promise to have an open mind.
And while you are explaining I will provide the following accompainment. It was suited for Kennedy… Maybe good for Obama too…
It’s true! It’s true! The crown has made it clear.
The climate must be perfect all the year.A law was made a distant moon ago here:
July and August cannot be too hot.
And there’s a legal limit to the snow here
In Camelot.
The winter is forbidden till December
And exits March the second on the dot.
By order, summer lingers through September
In Camelot.
Camelot! Camelot!
I know it sounds a bit bizarre,
But in Camelot, Camelot
That’s how conditions are.
The rain may never fall till after sundown.
By eight, the morning fog must disappear.
In short, there’s simply not
A more congenial spot
For happily-ever-aftering than here
In Camelot.Camelot! Camelot!
I know it gives a person pause,
But in Camelot, Camelot
Those are the legal laws.
The snow may never slush upon the hillside.
By nine p.m. the moonlight must appear.
In short, there’s simply not
A more congenial spot
For happily-ever-aftering than here
In CamelotJust want a healthy dose of reality from our next president. Good know this one does know it…
Take Care People,
CE
ParticipantI would also be interested in hearing about his “new” ideals. McCain has a huge following and I ,for one, was willing to vote for a democratic president but it was neither of the big two. Every time I see that stupid sticker that says “hope” I cringe. What does he offer that earn that title? Please explain it to me.
Everytime I hear McCain is the next Bush it makes me cringe. Are these the only two platforms that he is running on? Hope and McCain = Bush. Please explain with a valid arguement and I will promise to have an open mind.
And while you are explaining I will provide the following accompainment. It was suited for Kennedy… Maybe good for Obama too…
It’s true! It’s true! The crown has made it clear.
The climate must be perfect all the year.A law was made a distant moon ago here:
July and August cannot be too hot.
And there’s a legal limit to the snow here
In Camelot.
The winter is forbidden till December
And exits March the second on the dot.
By order, summer lingers through September
In Camelot.
Camelot! Camelot!
I know it sounds a bit bizarre,
But in Camelot, Camelot
That’s how conditions are.
The rain may never fall till after sundown.
By eight, the morning fog must disappear.
In short, there’s simply not
A more congenial spot
For happily-ever-aftering than here
In Camelot.Camelot! Camelot!
I know it gives a person pause,
But in Camelot, Camelot
Those are the legal laws.
The snow may never slush upon the hillside.
By nine p.m. the moonlight must appear.
In short, there’s simply not
A more congenial spot
For happily-ever-aftering than here
In CamelotJust want a healthy dose of reality from our next president. Good know this one does know it…
Take Care People,
CE
ParticipantHowever… There could be one for ATT Landline… One for SDGE… One for Sprint Cellular… Blah Blah Blah… I understand the point you are trying to make but they may not actually be for REs.
CE
ParticipantHowever… There could be one for ATT Landline… One for SDGE… One for Sprint Cellular… Blah Blah Blah… I understand the point you are trying to make but they may not actually be for REs.
CE
ParticipantHowever… There could be one for ATT Landline… One for SDGE… One for Sprint Cellular… Blah Blah Blah… I understand the point you are trying to make but they may not actually be for REs.
CE
ParticipantHowever… There could be one for ATT Landline… One for SDGE… One for Sprint Cellular… Blah Blah Blah… I understand the point you are trying to make but they may not actually be for REs.
CE
ParticipantHowever… There could be one for ATT Landline… One for SDGE… One for Sprint Cellular… Blah Blah Blah… I understand the point you are trying to make but they may not actually be for REs.
CE
July 8, 2008 at 11:26 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #235515ParticipantFunny thing is Aecetia…
I actually think that FEMA is necessary. There needs to be a goverment entity for a initial response. E.G. the rescue effort. The amount of mismanagement after that clearly dictates that someone else should/could have done better.
No easy answers to any of this.
But maybe if we did to some of our officials who have blanatly profited, or worse, been incompetent that China does… I bet things would be different in this country…
PS I am lazy tonight and not checking spelling thus my postings look like someone’s who adds and subtracts better than they write… The mark of an engineer.
Regards,
CE
July 8, 2008 at 11:26 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #235642ParticipantFunny thing is Aecetia…
I actually think that FEMA is necessary. There needs to be a goverment entity for a initial response. E.G. the rescue effort. The amount of mismanagement after that clearly dictates that someone else should/could have done better.
No easy answers to any of this.
But maybe if we did to some of our officials who have blanatly profited, or worse, been incompetent that China does… I bet things would be different in this country…
PS I am lazy tonight and not checking spelling thus my postings look like someone’s who adds and subtracts better than they write… The mark of an engineer.
Regards,
CE
July 8, 2008 at 11:26 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #235651ParticipantFunny thing is Aecetia…
I actually think that FEMA is necessary. There needs to be a goverment entity for a initial response. E.G. the rescue effort. The amount of mismanagement after that clearly dictates that someone else should/could have done better.
No easy answers to any of this.
But maybe if we did to some of our officials who have blanatly profited, or worse, been incompetent that China does… I bet things would be different in this country…
PS I am lazy tonight and not checking spelling thus my postings look like someone’s who adds and subtracts better than they write… The mark of an engineer.
Regards,
CE
July 8, 2008 at 11:26 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #235699ParticipantFunny thing is Aecetia…
I actually think that FEMA is necessary. There needs to be a goverment entity for a initial response. E.G. the rescue effort. The amount of mismanagement after that clearly dictates that someone else should/could have done better.
No easy answers to any of this.
But maybe if we did to some of our officials who have blanatly profited, or worse, been incompetent that China does… I bet things would be different in this country…
PS I am lazy tonight and not checking spelling thus my postings look like someone’s who adds and subtracts better than they write… The mark of an engineer.
Regards,
CE
July 8, 2008 at 11:26 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #235706ParticipantFunny thing is Aecetia…
I actually think that FEMA is necessary. There needs to be a goverment entity for a initial response. E.G. the rescue effort. The amount of mismanagement after that clearly dictates that someone else should/could have done better.
No easy answers to any of this.
But maybe if we did to some of our officials who have blanatly profited, or worse, been incompetent that China does… I bet things would be different in this country…
PS I am lazy tonight and not checking spelling thus my postings look like someone’s who adds and subtracts better than they write… The mark of an engineer.
Regards,
CE
July 8, 2008 at 10:58 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #235465ParticipantOne thing I would like to point out, and before I do I would like to qualify the following…
I am a Republican (for the most part)
I am against the War but will support it if there is anything we can do to prevent civil war (we have already messed it up and owe it to the Iraqi ppl to try to stabalize it)
I hate I hate I hate… George Bush
GWB does not equal John McCain (I wish the Dems would stop that analogy)But I am tired of hearing how the Republicans are warmongers. If you look at our history it has been the Dems that have spent more money (adjusted for todays terms)on war. You can argue that this or that war was just or that Vietnam was bad BUT LBJ pushed through the helpful socail programs of the times. But mostly you can blame it on timing. Just stop accusing Reps of warmongering because it simply isnt true (don’t forgot low intensity conflicts like the Bay of Pigs). There is enough wat blame to go around on that one.
And there are people who need help out there. But they are not the ones holding up street signs saying so. In fact the ones that really need it are the toughest to find. You usually have to ventrue somewhere you wouldn’t normally go to find the truelly needy. You’ll find a large portion of people out there that would be come self sucffient out there if they were made to be. The Reps seem to recongize that more than the Dems.
SDDuuude is slow working me in to the theory that goverment involvement only screws things up. I think that would go for most social programs.
Just had to rant because of the Warmongering remarks.
Red or Blue… Blood or Cuz…
We are all Piggs….
Take care PPL,
CE
July 8, 2008 at 10:58 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #235591ParticipantOne thing I would like to point out, and before I do I would like to qualify the following…
I am a Republican (for the most part)
I am against the War but will support it if there is anything we can do to prevent civil war (we have already messed it up and owe it to the Iraqi ppl to try to stabalize it)
I hate I hate I hate… George Bush
GWB does not equal John McCain (I wish the Dems would stop that analogy)But I am tired of hearing how the Republicans are warmongers. If you look at our history it has been the Dems that have spent more money (adjusted for todays terms)on war. You can argue that this or that war was just or that Vietnam was bad BUT LBJ pushed through the helpful socail programs of the times. But mostly you can blame it on timing. Just stop accusing Reps of warmongering because it simply isnt true (don’t forgot low intensity conflicts like the Bay of Pigs). There is enough wat blame to go around on that one.
And there are people who need help out there. But they are not the ones holding up street signs saying so. In fact the ones that really need it are the toughest to find. You usually have to ventrue somewhere you wouldn’t normally go to find the truelly needy. You’ll find a large portion of people out there that would be come self sucffient out there if they were made to be. The Reps seem to recongize that more than the Dems.
SDDuuude is slow working me in to the theory that goverment involvement only screws things up. I think that would go for most social programs.
Just had to rant because of the Warmongering remarks.
Red or Blue… Blood or Cuz…
We are all Piggs….
Take care PPL,
CE
-
AuthorPosts
