Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
carlsbadworker
Participant[quote=bubble_contagion] BP was a great buy at the height of the oil spill crisis.[/quote]
Except the height of the oil spill is retrospective. How would you know that their last attempt to plug the hole is really the last attempt unless you look back from the future.
Participant[quote=bubble_contagion] BP was a great buy at the height of the oil spill crisis.[/quote]
Except the height of the oil spill is retrospective. How would you know that their last attempt to plug the hole is really the last attempt unless you look back from the future.
Participant[quote=bubble_contagion] BP was a great buy at the height of the oil spill crisis.[/quote]
Except the height of the oil spill is retrospective. How would you know that their last attempt to plug the hole is really the last attempt unless you look back from the future.
Participant[quote=bubble_contagion] BP was a great buy at the height of the oil spill crisis.[/quote]
Except the height of the oil spill is retrospective. How would you know that their last attempt to plug the hole is really the last attempt unless you look back from the future.
Participant[quote=Eugene]
Some losses seem overblown even in the short run. For example, does anyone really believe that the earthquake justifies a 5% drop in the valuation of Toyota?[/quote]No, it doesn’t justify a 5% drop in valuation. But what makes you think it was fair valued to begin with?
Participant[quote=Eugene]
Some losses seem overblown even in the short run. For example, does anyone really believe that the earthquake justifies a 5% drop in the valuation of Toyota?[/quote]No, it doesn’t justify a 5% drop in valuation. But what makes you think it was fair valued to begin with?
Participant[quote=Eugene]
Some losses seem overblown even in the short run. For example, does anyone really believe that the earthquake justifies a 5% drop in the valuation of Toyota?[/quote]No, it doesn’t justify a 5% drop in valuation. But what makes you think it was fair valued to begin with?
Participant[quote=Eugene]
Some losses seem overblown even in the short run. For example, does anyone really believe that the earthquake justifies a 5% drop in the valuation of Toyota?[/quote]No, it doesn’t justify a 5% drop in valuation. But what makes you think it was fair valued to begin with?
Participant[quote=Eugene]
Some losses seem overblown even in the short run. For example, does anyone really believe that the earthquake justifies a 5% drop in the valuation of Toyota?[/quote]No, it doesn’t justify a 5% drop in valuation. But what makes you think it was fair valued to begin with?
Participant“The triangle of life” is a controversial theory that was rejected by United States Geological Survey & Red Cross, etc.
http://www.earthquakecountry.info/dropcoverholdon/Petal_Rejoinder_to_Copp_0906.pdf
Participant“The triangle of life” is a controversial theory that was rejected by United States Geological Survey & Red Cross, etc.
http://www.earthquakecountry.info/dropcoverholdon/Petal_Rejoinder_to_Copp_0906.pdf
Participant“The triangle of life” is a controversial theory that was rejected by United States Geological Survey & Red Cross, etc.
http://www.earthquakecountry.info/dropcoverholdon/Petal_Rejoinder_to_Copp_0906.pdf
Participant“The triangle of life” is a controversial theory that was rejected by United States Geological Survey & Red Cross, etc.
http://www.earthquakecountry.info/dropcoverholdon/Petal_Rejoinder_to_Copp_0906.pdf
Participant“The triangle of life” is a controversial theory that was rejected by United States Geological Survey & Red Cross, etc.
http://www.earthquakecountry.info/dropcoverholdon/Petal_Rejoinder_to_Copp_0906.pdf
-
AuthorPosts
