[CA renter]

My mother lived in Vienna, Austria during WWII. She always told me that bad things happen very quickly; otherwise, the populace could try to intervene and stop it.

A friend of mine is a “conspiracy theorist” and told me that a friend of his checked out one of the “camps” that were being built a couple of years ago…purportedly as a prison or training camp of some sort. They are there. Question is…what are they going to be used for?

The concept of the Amero and “united Americas” have been around for a while. Many think this is part of the plan laid out by the SPP. Here is the government (not tin-foil hat) site:

SPP Background

The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) was launched in March of 2005 as a trilateral effort to increase security and enhance prosperity among the United States, Canada and Mexico through greater cooperation and information sharing.

This trilateral initiative is premised on our security and our economic prosperity being mutually reinforcing. The SPP recognizes that our three great nations are bound by a shared belief in freedom, economic opportunity, and strong democratic institutions.

http://www.spp.gov/

[CA renter]

The coastal California – LA, SD, SF has not declined too much.
————————

I can show you many parts of SD and LA that have already seen 50%+ declines. What we are seeing is the result of the credit bubble collapsing (as it should). If prices went up as a result of the credit bubble, they will fall just the same. The only difference is the timing.

[CA renter]

The coastal California – LA, SD, SF has not declined too much.
————————

I can show you many parts of SD and LA that have already seen 50%+ declines. What we are seeing is the result of the credit bubble collapsing (as it should). If prices went up as a result of the credit bubble, they will fall just the same. The only difference is the timing.

[CA renter]

The coastal California – LA, SD, SF has not declined too much.
————————

I can show you many parts of SD and LA that have already seen 50%+ declines. What we are seeing is the result of the credit bubble collapsing (as it should). If prices went up as a result of the credit bubble, they will fall just the same. The only difference is the timing.

[CA renter]

The coastal California – LA, SD, SF has not declined too much.
————————

I can show you many parts of SD and LA that have already seen 50%+ declines. What we are seeing is the result of the credit bubble collapsing (as it should). If prices went up as a result of the credit bubble, they will fall just the same. The only difference is the timing.

[CA renter]

The coastal California – LA, SD, SF has not declined too much.
————————

I can show you many parts of SD and LA that have already seen 50%+ declines. What we are seeing is the result of the credit bubble collapsing (as it should). If prices went up as a result of the credit bubble, they will fall just the same. The only difference is the timing.

[CA renter]

IMO, many parties are complicit, but the main villain is Greenspan.

Over the years, he encouraged extreme risk-taking by bailing everyone out after each crash or negative financial event.

What we see today — the taxpayers’ on the hook for the risk that enabled Wall Street to have record profits — is a direct result of Greenspan’s policies.

Additionally, Greenspan sought to fight deflation at every turn, which kept the market from experiencing the necessary cleansing that keeps growth in check and minimizes misallocation of resources and gross financial distortions (bubbles).

He could have lowered rates (though did not need to) back in 2001-2003 but added a cautionary note with regard to bubble excesses. He could have honestly noted the parabolic move in the credit markets and warned everyone about the potential for a housing bubble. He could also have mentioned that it was STUPID for people to use adjustable-rate mortgages when rates were at multi-decade lows. He could have encouraged regulations that would have prevented the most egregious types of mortgages from ever coming to market.

He is the captain of this sinking ship, but saw what was happening so he “retired” and left his $h!t for someone else (Bernanke) to clean up.

I have a notion he is NOT stupid and this did NOT happen by accident. Lots of money was made by people who are long gone and sitting on an island or yacht right now.

[CA renter]

IMO, many parties are complicit, but the main villain is Greenspan.

Over the years, he encouraged extreme risk-taking by bailing everyone out after each crash or negative financial event.

What we see today — the taxpayers’ on the hook for the risk that enabled Wall Street to have record profits — is a direct result of Greenspan’s policies.

Additionally, Greenspan sought to fight deflation at every turn, which kept the market from experiencing the necessary cleansing that keeps growth in check and minimizes misallocation of resources and gross financial distortions (bubbles).

He could have lowered rates (though did not need to) back in 2001-2003 but added a cautionary note with regard to bubble excesses. He could have honestly noted the parabolic move in the credit markets and warned everyone about the potential for a housing bubble. He could also have mentioned that it was STUPID for people to use adjustable-rate mortgages when rates were at multi-decade lows. He could have encouraged regulations that would have prevented the most egregious types of mortgages from ever coming to market.

He is the captain of this sinking ship, but saw what was happening so he “retired” and left his $h!t for someone else (Bernanke) to clean up.

I have a notion he is NOT stupid and this did NOT happen by accident. Lots of money was made by people who are long gone and sitting on an island or yacht right now.

[CA renter]

IMO, many parties are complicit, but the main villain is Greenspan.

Over the years, he encouraged extreme risk-taking by bailing everyone out after each crash or negative financial event.

What we see today — the taxpayers’ on the hook for the risk that enabled Wall Street to have record profits — is a direct result of Greenspan’s policies.

Additionally, Greenspan sought to fight deflation at every turn, which kept the market from experiencing the necessary cleansing that keeps growth in check and minimizes misallocation of resources and gross financial distortions (bubbles).

He could have lowered rates (though did not need to) back in 2001-2003 but added a cautionary note with regard to bubble excesses. He could have honestly noted the parabolic move in the credit markets and warned everyone about the potential for a housing bubble. He could also have mentioned that it was STUPID for people to use adjustable-rate mortgages when rates were at multi-decade lows. He could have encouraged regulations that would have prevented the most egregious types of mortgages from ever coming to market.

He is the captain of this sinking ship, but saw what was happening so he “retired” and left his $h!t for someone else (Bernanke) to clean up.

I have a notion he is NOT stupid and this did NOT happen by accident. Lots of money was made by people who are long gone and sitting on an island or yacht right now.

[CA renter]

IMO, many parties are complicit, but the main villain is Greenspan.

Over the years, he encouraged extreme risk-taking by bailing everyone out after each crash or negative financial event.

What we see today — the taxpayers’ on the hook for the risk that enabled Wall Street to have record profits — is a direct result of Greenspan’s policies.

Additionally, Greenspan sought to fight deflation at every turn, which kept the market from experiencing the necessary cleansing that keeps growth in check and minimizes misallocation of resources and gross financial distortions (bubbles).

He could have lowered rates (though did not need to) back in 2001-2003 but added a cautionary note with regard to bubble excesses. He could have honestly noted the parabolic move in the credit markets and warned everyone about the potential for a housing bubble. He could also have mentioned that it was STUPID for people to use adjustable-rate mortgages when rates were at multi-decade lows. He could have encouraged regulations that would have prevented the most egregious types of mortgages from ever coming to market.

He is the captain of this sinking ship, but saw what was happening so he “retired” and left his $h!t for someone else (Bernanke) to clean up.

I have a notion he is NOT stupid and this did NOT happen by accident. Lots of money was made by people who are long gone and sitting on an island or yacht right now.

[CA renter]

IMO, many parties are complicit, but the main villain is Greenspan.

Over the years, he encouraged extreme risk-taking by bailing everyone out after each crash or negative financial event.

What we see today — the taxpayers’ on the hook for the risk that enabled Wall Street to have record profits — is a direct result of Greenspan’s policies.

Additionally, Greenspan sought to fight deflation at every turn, which kept the market from experiencing the necessary cleansing that keeps growth in check and minimizes misallocation of resources and gross financial distortions (bubbles).

He could have lowered rates (though did not need to) back in 2001-2003 but added a cautionary note with regard to bubble excesses. He could have honestly noted the parabolic move in the credit markets and warned everyone about the potential for a housing bubble. He could also have mentioned that it was STUPID for people to use adjustable-rate mortgages when rates were at multi-decade lows. He could have encouraged regulations that would have prevented the most egregious types of mortgages from ever coming to market.

He is the captain of this sinking ship, but saw what was happening so he “retired” and left his $h!t for someone else (Bernanke) to clean up.

I have a notion he is NOT stupid and this did NOT happen by accident. Lots of money was made by people who are long gone and sitting on an island or yacht right now.

[CA renter]

Same experience here, none of the people who argued with me (some big disagreements, too) have admitted to my being right.

The people who were more neutral (“it could happen” – types) have admitted that things are going down exactly like I said…but those people are few and far between.

[CA renter]

Same experience here, none of the people who argued with me (some big disagreements, too) have admitted to my being right.

The people who were more neutral (“it could happen” – types) have admitted that things are going down exactly like I said…but those people are few and far between.

[CA renter]

Same experience here, none of the people who argued with me (some big disagreements, too) have admitted to my being right.

The people who were more neutral (“it could happen” – types) have admitted that things are going down exactly like I said…but those people are few and far between.

[CA renter]

Same experience here, none of the people who argued with me (some big disagreements, too) have admitted to my being right.

The people who were more neutral (“it could happen” – types) have admitted that things are going down exactly like I said…but those people are few and far between.

[Author]

Posts