Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
blahblahblah
ParticipantIt wasn’t the Vandenberg launch, that was Nov. 5. This one was last night (Nov. 8). More info here.
The best case is that this was a Polaris missile test. The worst case is that someone was testing a Club K container missile system.
ParticipantCriticism, Schmiticism. We’ve got sub-launched ICBMs and we’re not afraid to use ’em.
The timing is interesting with the President being in Asia and all, and of course the launch westward over the Pacific is telling. It’s sort of like when the big Italian guys come into your restaurant and say, “Hmmmm, nice place you got here. It would be a shame for anything to happen to it…”
ParticipantCriticism, Schmiticism. We’ve got sub-launched ICBMs and we’re not afraid to use ’em.
The timing is interesting with the President being in Asia and all, and of course the launch westward over the Pacific is telling. It’s sort of like when the big Italian guys come into your restaurant and say, “Hmmmm, nice place you got here. It would be a shame for anything to happen to it…”
ParticipantCriticism, Schmiticism. We’ve got sub-launched ICBMs and we’re not afraid to use ’em.
The timing is interesting with the President being in Asia and all, and of course the launch westward over the Pacific is telling. It’s sort of like when the big Italian guys come into your restaurant and say, “Hmmmm, nice place you got here. It would be a shame for anything to happen to it…”
ParticipantCriticism, Schmiticism. We’ve got sub-launched ICBMs and we’re not afraid to use ’em.
The timing is interesting with the President being in Asia and all, and of course the launch westward over the Pacific is telling. It’s sort of like when the big Italian guys come into your restaurant and say, “Hmmmm, nice place you got here. It would be a shame for anything to happen to it…”
ParticipantCriticism, Schmiticism. We’ve got sub-launched ICBMs and we’re not afraid to use ’em.
The timing is interesting with the President being in Asia and all, and of course the launch westward over the Pacific is telling. It’s sort of like when the big Italian guys come into your restaurant and say, “Hmmmm, nice place you got here. It would be a shame for anything to happen to it…”
Participant[quote=briansd1]
In the context of the bailout continuing (everyone here seems to agree that the bailouts will continue), would we rather the money continue going to the banks? Or would we rather the money go to jobs for unemployed workers who will build some lasting infrastructure?[/quote]You and I have no say in the matter. Take a look at what happened to the goons in the last round — NOTHING. They are still in control. What will happen is what they want to happen.
[quote=walterwhite]
Maybe the problem is there are too many of us. Not me of course as I am essential. If the goal is to prop up the system the money should go to the banks. If the goal is to thin the herd then definitely no money should go to workers.[/quote]There are at least some powerful people who share this view.
Participant[quote=briansd1]
In the context of the bailout continuing (everyone here seems to agree that the bailouts will continue), would we rather the money continue going to the banks? Or would we rather the money go to jobs for unemployed workers who will build some lasting infrastructure?[/quote]You and I have no say in the matter. Take a look at what happened to the goons in the last round — NOTHING. They are still in control. What will happen is what they want to happen.
[quote=walterwhite]
Maybe the problem is there are too many of us. Not me of course as I am essential. If the goal is to prop up the system the money should go to the banks. If the goal is to thin the herd then definitely no money should go to workers.[/quote]There are at least some powerful people who share this view.
Participant[quote=briansd1]
In the context of the bailout continuing (everyone here seems to agree that the bailouts will continue), would we rather the money continue going to the banks? Or would we rather the money go to jobs for unemployed workers who will build some lasting infrastructure?[/quote]You and I have no say in the matter. Take a look at what happened to the goons in the last round — NOTHING. They are still in control. What will happen is what they want to happen.
[quote=walterwhite]
Maybe the problem is there are too many of us. Not me of course as I am essential. If the goal is to prop up the system the money should go to the banks. If the goal is to thin the herd then definitely no money should go to workers.[/quote]There are at least some powerful people who share this view.
Participant[quote=briansd1]
In the context of the bailout continuing (everyone here seems to agree that the bailouts will continue), would we rather the money continue going to the banks? Or would we rather the money go to jobs for unemployed workers who will build some lasting infrastructure?[/quote]You and I have no say in the matter. Take a look at what happened to the goons in the last round — NOTHING. They are still in control. What will happen is what they want to happen.
[quote=walterwhite]
Maybe the problem is there are too many of us. Not me of course as I am essential. If the goal is to prop up the system the money should go to the banks. If the goal is to thin the herd then definitely no money should go to workers.[/quote]There are at least some powerful people who share this view.
Participant[quote=briansd1]
In the context of the bailout continuing (everyone here seems to agree that the bailouts will continue), would we rather the money continue going to the banks? Or would we rather the money go to jobs for unemployed workers who will build some lasting infrastructure?[/quote]You and I have no say in the matter. Take a look at what happened to the goons in the last round — NOTHING. They are still in control. What will happen is what they want to happen.
[quote=walterwhite]
Maybe the problem is there are too many of us. Not me of course as I am essential. If the goal is to prop up the system the money should go to the banks. If the goal is to thin the herd then definitely no money should go to workers.[/quote]There are at least some powerful people who share this view.
ParticipantDuplicate post – whoops!
ParticipantDuplicate post – whoops!
ParticipantDuplicate post – whoops!
-
AuthorPosts
