[blahblahblah]

There is also the wireless Ethernet, and the security infrastructure it requires (ie.. radius servers etc….), they are not putting a lot of Cat-5 in buildings these days.

That’s because they’re putting in Cat-6. Serious work is done on gigabit ethernet; wireless is nice but not reliable enough for high availability systems.

[blahblahblah]

There is also the wireless Ethernet, and the security infrastructure it requires (ie.. radius servers etc….), they are not putting a lot of Cat-5 in buildings these days.

That’s because they’re putting in Cat-6. Serious work is done on gigabit ethernet; wireless is nice but not reliable enough for high availability systems.

[blahblahblah]

The American Soviet system is starting to reveal itself. Public employees earn the highest salaries and enjoy the best benefits, while private employees are told to “tough it out” in the “free market” as their jobs are sent overseas.

[blahblahblah]

The American Soviet system is starting to reveal itself. Public employees earn the highest salaries and enjoy the best benefits, while private employees are told to “tough it out” in the “free market” as their jobs are sent overseas.

[blahblahblah]

The American Soviet system is starting to reveal itself. Public employees earn the highest salaries and enjoy the best benefits, while private employees are told to “tough it out” in the “free market” as their jobs are sent overseas.

[blahblahblah]

The American Soviet system is starting to reveal itself. Public employees earn the highest salaries and enjoy the best benefits, while private employees are told to “tough it out” in the “free market” as their jobs are sent overseas.

[blahblahblah]

The American Soviet system is starting to reveal itself. Public employees earn the highest salaries and enjoy the best benefits, while private employees are told to “tough it out” in the “free market” as their jobs are sent overseas.

[blahblahblah]

I recognize that name “New-Fields”. They were the ones that held the conference about Iraq war investing opportunities that was shown in “Fahrenheit 9/11”.

Here is a paper I found about that conference.

Good luck everyone, I will be hiding under my sofa.

[blahblahblah]

I recognize that name “New-Fields”. They were the ones that held the conference about Iraq war investing opportunities that was shown in “Fahrenheit 9/11”.

Here is a paper I found about that conference.

Good luck everyone, I will be hiding under my sofa.

[blahblahblah]

I recognize that name “New-Fields”. They were the ones that held the conference about Iraq war investing opportunities that was shown in “Fahrenheit 9/11”.

Here is a paper I found about that conference.

Good luck everyone, I will be hiding under my sofa.

[blahblahblah]

I recognize that name “New-Fields”. They were the ones that held the conference about Iraq war investing opportunities that was shown in “Fahrenheit 9/11”.

Here is a paper I found about that conference.

Good luck everyone, I will be hiding under my sofa.

[blahblahblah]

I recognize that name “New-Fields”. They were the ones that held the conference about Iraq war investing opportunities that was shown in “Fahrenheit 9/11”.

Here is a paper I found about that conference.

Good luck everyone, I will be hiding under my sofa.

[blahblahblah]

I don’t think politicians worry about delivering on promises to voters one bit, at least at the congressional level. Just look at the re-election rate statistics. If you are a house member in 2008, your re-election chances are 94%. Only 6 in 100 lose their job every four years. They just make promises and then do whatever their lobbyist benefactors want them to afterwards. They know the public will forget all about those broken promises the next time election day rolls around.

Also, I’ve never heard a single politician run on a platform of keeping home prices high. If anything they run on a platform of “increasing home ownership” which is just code for more government backing of loans.

I am not saying this is good, I’m just saying it’s reality.

[blahblahblah]

I don’t think politicians worry about delivering on promises to voters one bit, at least at the congressional level. Just look at the re-election rate statistics. If you are a house member in 2008, your re-election chances are 94%. Only 6 in 100 lose their job every four years. They just make promises and then do whatever their lobbyist benefactors want them to afterwards. They know the public will forget all about those broken promises the next time election day rolls around.

Also, I’ve never heard a single politician run on a platform of keeping home prices high. If anything they run on a platform of “increasing home ownership” which is just code for more government backing of loans.

I am not saying this is good, I’m just saying it’s reality.

[blahblahblah]

I don’t think politicians worry about delivering on promises to voters one bit, at least at the congressional level. Just look at the re-election rate statistics. If you are a house member in 2008, your re-election chances are 94%. Only 6 in 100 lose their job every four years. They just make promises and then do whatever their lobbyist benefactors want them to afterwards. They know the public will forget all about those broken promises the next time election day rolls around.

Also, I’ve never heard a single politician run on a platform of keeping home prices high. If anything they run on a platform of “increasing home ownership” which is just code for more government backing of loans.

I am not saying this is good, I’m just saying it’s reality.

[Author]

Posts