Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 13, 2010 at 9:07 PM in reply to: OT – anyone else having trouble keeping up with the former Scaredy’s user names #564924June 13, 2010 at 9:07 PM in reply to: OT – anyone else having trouble keeping up with the former Scaredy’s user names #565030
bearishgurl
ParticipantI think walterwhite is most befitting of you, Scaredy. Go ahead and keep it. I have no problem with name changes. I understand everything. I’m as anal retentive as you are and can remember them all. If you can identify with walter the most, then keep it. Don’t let the job stress get to you and power to you, Scaredy!!
June 13, 2010 at 9:07 PM in reply to: OT – anyone else having trouble keeping up with the former Scaredy’s user names #565313ParticipantI think walterwhite is most befitting of you, Scaredy. Go ahead and keep it. I have no problem with name changes. I understand everything. I’m as anal retentive as you are and can remember them all. If you can identify with walter the most, then keep it. Don’t let the job stress get to you and power to you, Scaredy!!
Participant[quote=poorgradstudent]Just don’t be one of those people who buy in PB and then complain about the party crowd. I have a former co-worker who did just that. Bought a condo near Garnet and the beach when he was still going to bars, less than 6 months later he was complaining about them being loud, drunk, and peeing on his property.[/quote]
So true, poorgradstudent, this has been going on there since the dawn of time. I had a friend who lived EAST of Ingraham (over 1 mi. from PB) who STILL had problems with runaways loitering on his property and young people trying to change clothes behind his hedge.
Participant[quote=poorgradstudent]Just don’t be one of those people who buy in PB and then complain about the party crowd. I have a former co-worker who did just that. Bought a condo near Garnet and the beach when he was still going to bars, less than 6 months later he was complaining about them being loud, drunk, and peeing on his property.[/quote]
So true, poorgradstudent, this has been going on there since the dawn of time. I had a friend who lived EAST of Ingraham (over 1 mi. from PB) who STILL had problems with runaways loitering on his property and young people trying to change clothes behind his hedge.
Participant[quote=poorgradstudent]Just don’t be one of those people who buy in PB and then complain about the party crowd. I have a former co-worker who did just that. Bought a condo near Garnet and the beach when he was still going to bars, less than 6 months later he was complaining about them being loud, drunk, and peeing on his property.[/quote]
So true, poorgradstudent, this has been going on there since the dawn of time. I had a friend who lived EAST of Ingraham (over 1 mi. from PB) who STILL had problems with runaways loitering on his property and young people trying to change clothes behind his hedge.
Participant[quote=poorgradstudent]Just don’t be one of those people who buy in PB and then complain about the party crowd. I have a former co-worker who did just that. Bought a condo near Garnet and the beach when he was still going to bars, less than 6 months later he was complaining about them being loud, drunk, and peeing on his property.[/quote]
So true, poorgradstudent, this has been going on there since the dawn of time. I had a friend who lived EAST of Ingraham (over 1 mi. from PB) who STILL had problems with runaways loitering on his property and young people trying to change clothes behind his hedge.
Participant[quote=poorgradstudent]Just don’t be one of those people who buy in PB and then complain about the party crowd. I have a former co-worker who did just that. Bought a condo near Garnet and the beach when he was still going to bars, less than 6 months later he was complaining about them being loud, drunk, and peeing on his property.[/quote]
So true, poorgradstudent, this has been going on there since the dawn of time. I had a friend who lived EAST of Ingraham (over 1 mi. from PB) who STILL had problems with runaways loitering on his property and young people trying to change clothes behind his hedge.
Participant[quote=AN]BR, there is a 3500 sq-ft single story model. The biggest house in that development is >4100 sq-ft.[/quote]
AN, if this is the case, then your “12-16 ft. apart” guess is probably in the ballpark.
That sounds a little “crowded” to me given the price, esp. in the case of the two story homes. It’s almost as if they are looking into each other’s windows.
I guess if you’re viewing Sky Ranch with Bonita or older Chula (relatively flat) in your mind, you see one thing and if you’re viewing Sky Ranch and comparing it with MM tracts, the lots seem “big” . . . lol!
Participant[quote=AN]BR, there is a 3500 sq-ft single story model. The biggest house in that development is >4100 sq-ft.[/quote]
AN, if this is the case, then your “12-16 ft. apart” guess is probably in the ballpark.
That sounds a little “crowded” to me given the price, esp. in the case of the two story homes. It’s almost as if they are looking into each other’s windows.
I guess if you’re viewing Sky Ranch with Bonita or older Chula (relatively flat) in your mind, you see one thing and if you’re viewing Sky Ranch and comparing it with MM tracts, the lots seem “big” . . . lol!
Participant[quote=AN]BR, there is a 3500 sq-ft single story model. The biggest house in that development is >4100 sq-ft.[/quote]
AN, if this is the case, then your “12-16 ft. apart” guess is probably in the ballpark.
That sounds a little “crowded” to me given the price, esp. in the case of the two story homes. It’s almost as if they are looking into each other’s windows.
I guess if you’re viewing Sky Ranch with Bonita or older Chula (relatively flat) in your mind, you see one thing and if you’re viewing Sky Ranch and comparing it with MM tracts, the lots seem “big” . . . lol!
Participant[quote=AN]BR, there is a 3500 sq-ft single story model. The biggest house in that development is >4100 sq-ft.[/quote]
AN, if this is the case, then your “12-16 ft. apart” guess is probably in the ballpark.
That sounds a little “crowded” to me given the price, esp. in the case of the two story homes. It’s almost as if they are looking into each other’s windows.
I guess if you’re viewing Sky Ranch with Bonita or older Chula (relatively flat) in your mind, you see one thing and if you’re viewing Sky Ranch and comparing it with MM tracts, the lots seem “big” . . . lol!
Participant[quote=AN]BR, there is a 3500 sq-ft single story model. The biggest house in that development is >4100 sq-ft.[/quote]
AN, if this is the case, then your “12-16 ft. apart” guess is probably in the ballpark.
That sounds a little “crowded” to me given the price, esp. in the case of the two story homes. It’s almost as if they are looking into each other’s windows.
I guess if you’re viewing Sky Ranch with Bonita or older Chula (relatively flat) in your mind, you see one thing and if you’re viewing Sky Ranch and comparing it with MM tracts, the lots seem “big” . . . lol!
Participant[quote=kcal09]Based on your numbers it may take up to 12 years for you to recoup the initial investment. It will only make financial sense if you plan in your home for more than 15 years.[/quote]
Just saw this and completely agree, kcal09.
Participant[quote=kcal09]Based on your numbers it may take up to 12 years for you to recoup the initial investment. It will only make financial sense if you plan in your home for more than 15 years.[/quote]
Just saw this and completely agree, kcal09.
-
AuthorPosts
