Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
bearishgurl
ParticipantWow, recordsclerk . . . $629K? How accurate on values has “Foreclosure Radar” been in the past??
IMO, east of I-805 is NOT NEARLY as desirable as west of 805. If the property was near Morley Field or South Park/Burlingame, I could maybe see this value, but NOT block(s) or less than a mile from City Heights or even across the canyon from Hollywood Park and NOT for that size lot.
Power to the Flipper!!
bearishgurl
ParticipantWow, recordsclerk . . . $629K? How accurate on values has “Foreclosure Radar” been in the past??
IMO, east of I-805 is NOT NEARLY as desirable as west of 805. If the property was near Morley Field or South Park/Burlingame, I could maybe see this value, but NOT block(s) or less than a mile from City Heights or even across the canyon from Hollywood Park and NOT for that size lot.
Power to the Flipper!!
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]Mine is assumable I think (would need to double check but I remember that being part of it)
At 4.78 fixed that would be a nice loan to assume when rates hit 10%[/quote]
Wow, Nor-LA-SD-guy, you must have a very “seasoned loan.” I don’t recall any fixed-rate assumable loans ever being on the market except for the VA program.
All my loans in the last 22 years have been tied to the “COFI” index, which as of May 2010 was 4.609% (with 2.75% margin added).
I prefer this loan index (FHLBB 11th Dist. Cost of Funds in CA). My terms have been: 2.4% – 2.75% margin, 2% annual cap and 10.5% life cap. IMHO, there is NO COMPARISON to the ease and low cost of closing ($1800 – $2800) in the past and ($50 – $500 assumption fee) in the past.
I have never cared about the Neg Am or the Payment Option provision as I have always paid the fully-amortized rate and am/was happy to do so. COFI has been very good to me in the past and in fact has been going down every month for the better part of the last three years (currently 4.609% w/margin added). If my current loan is ever assumed, it would only cover about 50% of the purchase price (as EconProf previously stated). Based on the fact that persons who typically buy on my block do so to live walking distance to other relatives, it is entirely possible that a buyer would want to assume my loan if my bank accepts them and get help from their relatives for the other half of the purchase price π
I keep getting solicitations but have absolutely no incentive to waste $4K to $9K refinancing to a “fixed-rate” loan product as I refuse to pay lender “garbage charges” and COFI loans did not have them. They came with a very straightforward and clean Reg Z and Hud-1.
I do not see rates hitting 10% unless all h@ll breaks loose (not to say this COULDN’T happen) LOL! If I foresee this coming, I guess I would put my property on the market immediately and if it should sell, I would rent until I turn 59.5 years old, at which time I would again purchase property to live in if rates and terms allowed me to. If my place didn’t sell, I would probably have to take in a “roommate” :{
Well, guess I should mosey on over to that “sister-thread” about the coming “economic collapse” and see what the doomsdayers are predicting for next year – LOL!
Sorry for the minor hijack, querty007.
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]Mine is assumable I think (would need to double check but I remember that being part of it)
At 4.78 fixed that would be a nice loan to assume when rates hit 10%[/quote]
Wow, Nor-LA-SD-guy, you must have a very “seasoned loan.” I don’t recall any fixed-rate assumable loans ever being on the market except for the VA program.
All my loans in the last 22 years have been tied to the “COFI” index, which as of May 2010 was 4.609% (with 2.75% margin added).
I prefer this loan index (FHLBB 11th Dist. Cost of Funds in CA). My terms have been: 2.4% – 2.75% margin, 2% annual cap and 10.5% life cap. IMHO, there is NO COMPARISON to the ease and low cost of closing ($1800 – $2800) in the past and ($50 – $500 assumption fee) in the past.
I have never cared about the Neg Am or the Payment Option provision as I have always paid the fully-amortized rate and am/was happy to do so. COFI has been very good to me in the past and in fact has been going down every month for the better part of the last three years (currently 4.609% w/margin added). If my current loan is ever assumed, it would only cover about 50% of the purchase price (as EconProf previously stated). Based on the fact that persons who typically buy on my block do so to live walking distance to other relatives, it is entirely possible that a buyer would want to assume my loan if my bank accepts them and get help from their relatives for the other half of the purchase price π
I keep getting solicitations but have absolutely no incentive to waste $4K to $9K refinancing to a “fixed-rate” loan product as I refuse to pay lender “garbage charges” and COFI loans did not have them. They came with a very straightforward and clean Reg Z and Hud-1.
I do not see rates hitting 10% unless all h@ll breaks loose (not to say this COULDN’T happen) LOL! If I foresee this coming, I guess I would put my property on the market immediately and if it should sell, I would rent until I turn 59.5 years old, at which time I would again purchase property to live in if rates and terms allowed me to. If my place didn’t sell, I would probably have to take in a “roommate” :{
Well, guess I should mosey on over to that “sister-thread” about the coming “economic collapse” and see what the doomsdayers are predicting for next year – LOL!
Sorry for the minor hijack, querty007.
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]Mine is assumable I think (would need to double check but I remember that being part of it)
At 4.78 fixed that would be a nice loan to assume when rates hit 10%[/quote]
Wow, Nor-LA-SD-guy, you must have a very “seasoned loan.” I don’t recall any fixed-rate assumable loans ever being on the market except for the VA program.
All my loans in the last 22 years have been tied to the “COFI” index, which as of May 2010 was 4.609% (with 2.75% margin added).
I prefer this loan index (FHLBB 11th Dist. Cost of Funds in CA). My terms have been: 2.4% – 2.75% margin, 2% annual cap and 10.5% life cap. IMHO, there is NO COMPARISON to the ease and low cost of closing ($1800 – $2800) in the past and ($50 – $500 assumption fee) in the past.
I have never cared about the Neg Am or the Payment Option provision as I have always paid the fully-amortized rate and am/was happy to do so. COFI has been very good to me in the past and in fact has been going down every month for the better part of the last three years (currently 4.609% w/margin added). If my current loan is ever assumed, it would only cover about 50% of the purchase price (as EconProf previously stated). Based on the fact that persons who typically buy on my block do so to live walking distance to other relatives, it is entirely possible that a buyer would want to assume my loan if my bank accepts them and get help from their relatives for the other half of the purchase price π
I keep getting solicitations but have absolutely no incentive to waste $4K to $9K refinancing to a “fixed-rate” loan product as I refuse to pay lender “garbage charges” and COFI loans did not have them. They came with a very straightforward and clean Reg Z and Hud-1.
I do not see rates hitting 10% unless all h@ll breaks loose (not to say this COULDN’T happen) LOL! If I foresee this coming, I guess I would put my property on the market immediately and if it should sell, I would rent until I turn 59.5 years old, at which time I would again purchase property to live in if rates and terms allowed me to. If my place didn’t sell, I would probably have to take in a “roommate” :{
Well, guess I should mosey on over to that “sister-thread” about the coming “economic collapse” and see what the doomsdayers are predicting for next year – LOL!
Sorry for the minor hijack, querty007.
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]Mine is assumable I think (would need to double check but I remember that being part of it)
At 4.78 fixed that would be a nice loan to assume when rates hit 10%[/quote]
Wow, Nor-LA-SD-guy, you must have a very “seasoned loan.” I don’t recall any fixed-rate assumable loans ever being on the market except for the VA program.
All my loans in the last 22 years have been tied to the “COFI” index, which as of May 2010 was 4.609% (with 2.75% margin added).
I prefer this loan index (FHLBB 11th Dist. Cost of Funds in CA). My terms have been: 2.4% – 2.75% margin, 2% annual cap and 10.5% life cap. IMHO, there is NO COMPARISON to the ease and low cost of closing ($1800 – $2800) in the past and ($50 – $500 assumption fee) in the past.
I have never cared about the Neg Am or the Payment Option provision as I have always paid the fully-amortized rate and am/was happy to do so. COFI has been very good to me in the past and in fact has been going down every month for the better part of the last three years (currently 4.609% w/margin added). If my current loan is ever assumed, it would only cover about 50% of the purchase price (as EconProf previously stated). Based on the fact that persons who typically buy on my block do so to live walking distance to other relatives, it is entirely possible that a buyer would want to assume my loan if my bank accepts them and get help from their relatives for the other half of the purchase price π
I keep getting solicitations but have absolutely no incentive to waste $4K to $9K refinancing to a “fixed-rate” loan product as I refuse to pay lender “garbage charges” and COFI loans did not have them. They came with a very straightforward and clean Reg Z and Hud-1.
I do not see rates hitting 10% unless all h@ll breaks loose (not to say this COULDN’T happen) LOL! If I foresee this coming, I guess I would put my property on the market immediately and if it should sell, I would rent until I turn 59.5 years old, at which time I would again purchase property to live in if rates and terms allowed me to. If my place didn’t sell, I would probably have to take in a “roommate” :{
Well, guess I should mosey on over to that “sister-thread” about the coming “economic collapse” and see what the doomsdayers are predicting for next year – LOL!
Sorry for the minor hijack, querty007.
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]Mine is assumable I think (would need to double check but I remember that being part of it)
At 4.78 fixed that would be a nice loan to assume when rates hit 10%[/quote]
Wow, Nor-LA-SD-guy, you must have a very “seasoned loan.” I don’t recall any fixed-rate assumable loans ever being on the market except for the VA program.
All my loans in the last 22 years have been tied to the “COFI” index, which as of May 2010 was 4.609% (with 2.75% margin added).
I prefer this loan index (FHLBB 11th Dist. Cost of Funds in CA). My terms have been: 2.4% – 2.75% margin, 2% annual cap and 10.5% life cap. IMHO, there is NO COMPARISON to the ease and low cost of closing ($1800 – $2800) in the past and ($50 – $500 assumption fee) in the past.
I have never cared about the Neg Am or the Payment Option provision as I have always paid the fully-amortized rate and am/was happy to do so. COFI has been very good to me in the past and in fact has been going down every month for the better part of the last three years (currently 4.609% w/margin added). If my current loan is ever assumed, it would only cover about 50% of the purchase price (as EconProf previously stated). Based on the fact that persons who typically buy on my block do so to live walking distance to other relatives, it is entirely possible that a buyer would want to assume my loan if my bank accepts them and get help from their relatives for the other half of the purchase price π
I keep getting solicitations but have absolutely no incentive to waste $4K to $9K refinancing to a “fixed-rate” loan product as I refuse to pay lender “garbage charges” and COFI loans did not have them. They came with a very straightforward and clean Reg Z and Hud-1.
I do not see rates hitting 10% unless all h@ll breaks loose (not to say this COULDN’T happen) LOL! If I foresee this coming, I guess I would put my property on the market immediately and if it should sell, I would rent until I turn 59.5 years old, at which time I would again purchase property to live in if rates and terms allowed me to. If my place didn’t sell, I would probably have to take in a “roommate” :{
Well, guess I should mosey on over to that “sister-thread” about the coming “economic collapse” and see what the doomsdayers are predicting for next year – LOL!
Sorry for the minor hijack, querty007.
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=SK in CV] . . . The borrowers in deep trouble. Costs were rarely under 10 pts, often much higher. 2 to 4 year, interest only loans at high rates, usually 5-7% or so more than conventional rates. . . [/quote]
SK in CV, I didn’t really know what his loan terms were. I can tell you that several of his “repeat” customers were “flippers.” His loans were easier to get than high-rate non-owner occupancy loans, esp. if you needed more than one loan at a time.
Back in those days, as long as you “owned” the property for six months and one day before your buyer’s loan closed, 50% of your “capital gains” for tax purposes was excluded from “income.” (Any Pigg-accountant geeks, let me know if I didn’t state that correctly π The flippers who had the manpower/equip. to “hustle” didn’t NEED a long-term loan.
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=SK in CV] . . . The borrowers in deep trouble. Costs were rarely under 10 pts, often much higher. 2 to 4 year, interest only loans at high rates, usually 5-7% or so more than conventional rates. . . [/quote]
SK in CV, I didn’t really know what his loan terms were. I can tell you that several of his “repeat” customers were “flippers.” His loans were easier to get than high-rate non-owner occupancy loans, esp. if you needed more than one loan at a time.
Back in those days, as long as you “owned” the property for six months and one day before your buyer’s loan closed, 50% of your “capital gains” for tax purposes was excluded from “income.” (Any Pigg-accountant geeks, let me know if I didn’t state that correctly π The flippers who had the manpower/equip. to “hustle” didn’t NEED a long-term loan.
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=SK in CV] . . . The borrowers in deep trouble. Costs were rarely under 10 pts, often much higher. 2 to 4 year, interest only loans at high rates, usually 5-7% or so more than conventional rates. . . [/quote]
SK in CV, I didn’t really know what his loan terms were. I can tell you that several of his “repeat” customers were “flippers.” His loans were easier to get than high-rate non-owner occupancy loans, esp. if you needed more than one loan at a time.
Back in those days, as long as you “owned” the property for six months and one day before your buyer’s loan closed, 50% of your “capital gains” for tax purposes was excluded from “income.” (Any Pigg-accountant geeks, let me know if I didn’t state that correctly π The flippers who had the manpower/equip. to “hustle” didn’t NEED a long-term loan.
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=SK in CV] . . . The borrowers in deep trouble. Costs were rarely under 10 pts, often much higher. 2 to 4 year, interest only loans at high rates, usually 5-7% or so more than conventional rates. . . [/quote]
SK in CV, I didn’t really know what his loan terms were. I can tell you that several of his “repeat” customers were “flippers.” His loans were easier to get than high-rate non-owner occupancy loans, esp. if you needed more than one loan at a time.
Back in those days, as long as you “owned” the property for six months and one day before your buyer’s loan closed, 50% of your “capital gains” for tax purposes was excluded from “income.” (Any Pigg-accountant geeks, let me know if I didn’t state that correctly π The flippers who had the manpower/equip. to “hustle” didn’t NEED a long-term loan.
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=SK in CV] . . . The borrowers in deep trouble. Costs were rarely under 10 pts, often much higher. 2 to 4 year, interest only loans at high rates, usually 5-7% or so more than conventional rates. . . [/quote]
SK in CV, I didn’t really know what his loan terms were. I can tell you that several of his “repeat” customers were “flippers.” His loans were easier to get than high-rate non-owner occupancy loans, esp. if you needed more than one loan at a time.
Back in those days, as long as you “owned” the property for six months and one day before your buyer’s loan closed, 50% of your “capital gains” for tax purposes was excluded from “income.” (Any Pigg-accountant geeks, let me know if I didn’t state that correctly π The flippers who had the manpower/equip. to “hustle” didn’t NEED a long-term loan.
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=ryphoenix]Any recommendations on good agents on these 2 areas? I don’t think any of the pigg agents are experts of these two areas unfortunately, and neither is JTR. (But feel free to correct me!) Someone mentioned Rudy Theobald…and I’ve heard Gary Kent is good?? I’m a first time buyer… so help please![/quote]
ryphoenix, if you hire “Gary Kent,” you probably won’t get “Gary.” I believe he has at least a dozen “buyer’s agents” working under his license.
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=ryphoenix]Any recommendations on good agents on these 2 areas? I don’t think any of the pigg agents are experts of these two areas unfortunately, and neither is JTR. (But feel free to correct me!) Someone mentioned Rudy Theobald…and I’ve heard Gary Kent is good?? I’m a first time buyer… so help please![/quote]
ryphoenix, if you hire “Gary Kent,” you probably won’t get “Gary.” I believe he has at least a dozen “buyer’s agents” working under his license.
-
AuthorPosts
