Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
beanmaestro
Participant[quote=kev374]
Considering Software Engineers with 10 years experience are being offered $70k salaries these days I think paying that to a high school teachers is ludicrous, it should be more like $30k considering it is only for 9 months of work.[/quote]You’re joking, right? The guy probably has a master’s degree, 10 years experience, is doing hard & important work in an in-demand profession. Good on him for making $8k/month, though the same creds at my (engineering) company would probably pay $9k/mo.
ParticipantBizarre. A good formula would look like:
(Age – X)*(Income – Y)*CParticipantBizarre. A good formula would look like:
(Age – X)*(Income – Y)*CParticipantBizarre. A good formula would look like:
(Age – X)*(Income – Y)*CParticipantBizarre. A good formula would look like:
(Age – X)*(Income – Y)*CParticipantBizarre. A good formula would look like:
(Age – X)*(Income – Y)*CParticipantRe: future taxes on Roths
I think there’s a less than 50% chance that Roths get taxed. The majority of middle & upper class voters have them, and with more wealthy people converting to Roths (and paying conversion taxes), there’s a lot of political donors opposed.
Anyway, I look at it as a tax hedge. I’ve only got 20% of my money in it, so it’s not that painful if they do tax withdrawls. And it offers a lot of flexibility vs. 401k withdrawals for minimizing taxes.
ParticipantRe: future taxes on Roths
I think there’s a less than 50% chance that Roths get taxed. The majority of middle & upper class voters have them, and with more wealthy people converting to Roths (and paying conversion taxes), there’s a lot of political donors opposed.
Anyway, I look at it as a tax hedge. I’ve only got 20% of my money in it, so it’s not that painful if they do tax withdrawls. And it offers a lot of flexibility vs. 401k withdrawals for minimizing taxes.
ParticipantRe: future taxes on Roths
I think there’s a less than 50% chance that Roths get taxed. The majority of middle & upper class voters have them, and with more wealthy people converting to Roths (and paying conversion taxes), there’s a lot of political donors opposed.
Anyway, I look at it as a tax hedge. I’ve only got 20% of my money in it, so it’s not that painful if they do tax withdrawls. And it offers a lot of flexibility vs. 401k withdrawals for minimizing taxes.
ParticipantRe: future taxes on Roths
I think there’s a less than 50% chance that Roths get taxed. The majority of middle & upper class voters have them, and with more wealthy people converting to Roths (and paying conversion taxes), there’s a lot of political donors opposed.
Anyway, I look at it as a tax hedge. I’ve only got 20% of my money in it, so it’s not that painful if they do tax withdrawls. And it offers a lot of flexibility vs. 401k withdrawals for minimizing taxes.
ParticipantRe: future taxes on Roths
I think there’s a less than 50% chance that Roths get taxed. The majority of middle & upper class voters have them, and with more wealthy people converting to Roths (and paying conversion taxes), there’s a lot of political donors opposed.
Anyway, I look at it as a tax hedge. I’ve only got 20% of my money in it, so it’s not that painful if they do tax withdrawls. And it offers a lot of flexibility vs. 401k withdrawals for minimizing taxes.
ParticipantI was confused by that until I studied the table.
I read that the “number of people per foreclosure” is down, usually by ~50%. That is to say, the number of people stayed constant, and foreclosures doubled.
ParticipantI was confused by that until I studied the table.
I read that the “number of people per foreclosure” is down, usually by ~50%. That is to say, the number of people stayed constant, and foreclosures doubled.
ParticipantI was confused by that until I studied the table.
I read that the “number of people per foreclosure” is down, usually by ~50%. That is to say, the number of people stayed constant, and foreclosures doubled.
-
AuthorPosts