[Ash Housewares]

You can contact Tom Adkins, that long-haired weirdo who cockily said that prices would go up 10% in 2007, here:

http://www.tadkins.remax-nj.com/remaxnj/index.asp?acc=55894

I’m sure he’d appreciate hearing from us.

[Ash Housewares]

You can contact Tom Adkins, that long-haired weirdo who cockily said that prices would go up 10% in 2007, here:

http://www.tadkins.remax-nj.com/remaxnj/index.asp?acc=55894

I’m sure he’d appreciate hearing from us.

[Ash Housewares]

You can contact Tom Adkins, that long-haired weirdo who cockily said that prices would go up 10% in 2007, here:

http://www.tadkins.remax-nj.com/remaxnj/index.asp?acc=55894

I’m sure he’d appreciate hearing from us.

[Ash Housewares]

You can contact Tom Adkins, that long-haired weirdo who cockily said that prices would go up 10% in 2007, here:

http://www.tadkins.remax-nj.com/remaxnj/index.asp?acc=55894

I’m sure he’d appreciate hearing from us.

[Ash Housewares]

She stands to make roughly $45,000 in commission, and she wants YOU to do all the legwork by calling all the area Realtors? Ha! What does she think she is being paid for? Her personality?

[Ash Housewares]

She stands to make roughly $45,000 in commission, and she wants YOU to do all the legwork by calling all the area Realtors? Ha! What does she think she is being paid for? Her personality?

[Ash Housewares]

She stands to make roughly $45,000 in commission, and she wants YOU to do all the legwork by calling all the area Realtors? Ha! What does she think she is being paid for? Her personality?

[Ash Housewares]

She stands to make roughly $45,000 in commission, and she wants YOU to do all the legwork by calling all the area Realtors? Ha! What does she think she is being paid for? Her personality?

[Ash Housewares]

She stands to make roughly $45,000 in commission, and she wants YOU to do all the legwork by calling all the area Realtors? Ha! What does she think she is being paid for? Her personality?

[Ash Housewares]

It’s been said in the AI community that neural nets are always the ‘second best’ solution. Meaning, that a well-groomed expert system will always beat them.

That’s interesting, the book I’m reading now claims just the opposite. In “Super Crunchers: How Thinking by Numbers is the new way to be Smart” by Ayres he describes how algorithms beat human experts in field after field, whether it’s predicting the future success of baseball players, if a particular vintage wine will be good, or how the Chief Justices will vote in a court case. In test after test, the algorithms beat the experts.

[Ash Housewares]

It’s been said in the AI community that neural nets are always the ‘second best’ solution. Meaning, that a well-groomed expert system will always beat them.

That’s interesting, the book I’m reading now claims just the opposite. In “Super Crunchers: How Thinking by Numbers is the new way to be Smart” by Ayres he describes how algorithms beat human experts in field after field, whether it’s predicting the future success of baseball players, if a particular vintage wine will be good, or how the Chief Justices will vote in a court case. In test after test, the algorithms beat the experts.

[Ash Housewares]

It’s been said in the AI community that neural nets are always the ‘second best’ solution. Meaning, that a well-groomed expert system will always beat them.

That’s interesting, the book I’m reading now claims just the opposite. In “Super Crunchers: How Thinking by Numbers is the new way to be Smart” by Ayres he describes how algorithms beat human experts in field after field, whether it’s predicting the future success of baseball players, if a particular vintage wine will be good, or how the Chief Justices will vote in a court case. In test after test, the algorithms beat the experts.

[Ash Housewares]

It’s been said in the AI community that neural nets are always the ‘second best’ solution. Meaning, that a well-groomed expert system will always beat them.

That’s interesting, the book I’m reading now claims just the opposite. In “Super Crunchers: How Thinking by Numbers is the new way to be Smart” by Ayres he describes how algorithms beat human experts in field after field, whether it’s predicting the future success of baseball players, if a particular vintage wine will be good, or how the Chief Justices will vote in a court case. In test after test, the algorithms beat the experts.

[Ash Housewares]

It’s been said in the AI community that neural nets are always the ‘second best’ solution. Meaning, that a well-groomed expert system will always beat them.

That’s interesting, the book I’m reading now claims just the opposite. In “Super Crunchers: How Thinking by Numbers is the new way to be Smart” by Ayres he describes how algorithms beat human experts in field after field, whether it’s predicting the future success of baseball players, if a particular vintage wine will be good, or how the Chief Justices will vote in a court case. In test after test, the algorithms beat the experts.

[Ash Housewares]

A good article on the subject, and shameless bump for my topic:

[Author]

Posts