Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantRus: Back when I was in the counterinsurgency business, “facha” was slang for a fascist (also, “fascista”). Is that what you were going for?
I agree with the “look like a world leader” idea, but doesn’t Obama look more like Urkel?
The real corporate proto-Nazi (appearance-wise) was Mitt Romney. Man, that guy looked like a robot. “Facha” also means appearance, no?
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantRus: Back when I was in the counterinsurgency business, “facha” was slang for a fascist (also, “fascista”). Is that what you were going for?
I agree with the “look like a world leader” idea, but doesn’t Obama look more like Urkel?
The real corporate proto-Nazi (appearance-wise) was Mitt Romney. Man, that guy looked like a robot. “Facha” also means appearance, no?
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantRus: Back when I was in the counterinsurgency business, “facha” was slang for a fascist (also, “fascista”). Is that what you were going for?
I agree with the “look like a world leader” idea, but doesn’t Obama look more like Urkel?
The real corporate proto-Nazi (appearance-wise) was Mitt Romney. Man, that guy looked like a robot. “Facha” also means appearance, no?
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantseattle: Gotta agree with you on this one. This is just childish finger pointing. After watching idiot politicians from both sides of the aisle bloviating, it’s obvious they’re pretty much all morons.
I thihk what we are all striving for here is to raise the level of dialogue, not demean it with this sort of stuff.
On your YouTube video: What if you’re more than one type of Republican?
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantseattle: Gotta agree with you on this one. This is just childish finger pointing. After watching idiot politicians from both sides of the aisle bloviating, it’s obvious they’re pretty much all morons.
I thihk what we are all striving for here is to raise the level of dialogue, not demean it with this sort of stuff.
On your YouTube video: What if you’re more than one type of Republican?
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantseattle: Gotta agree with you on this one. This is just childish finger pointing. After watching idiot politicians from both sides of the aisle bloviating, it’s obvious they’re pretty much all morons.
I thihk what we are all striving for here is to raise the level of dialogue, not demean it with this sort of stuff.
On your YouTube video: What if you’re more than one type of Republican?
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantseattle: Gotta agree with you on this one. This is just childish finger pointing. After watching idiot politicians from both sides of the aisle bloviating, it’s obvious they’re pretty much all morons.
I thihk what we are all striving for here is to raise the level of dialogue, not demean it with this sort of stuff.
On your YouTube video: What if you’re more than one type of Republican?
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantseattle: Gotta agree with you on this one. This is just childish finger pointing. After watching idiot politicians from both sides of the aisle bloviating, it’s obvious they’re pretty much all morons.
I thihk what we are all striving for here is to raise the level of dialogue, not demean it with this sort of stuff.
On your YouTube video: What if you’re more than one type of Republican?
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantjp: This might appear to be a stupid question, but what, exactly, do they do? I checked out the Swan Lifestyle website, but there is nothing in terms of content there. This “hybrid business model” they tout/shill could be anything.
I understand the MLM concept, but don’t you have to have something in terms of a product or service in order to gull your “downline”?
Similar question to mine on BMIT. I’m not understanding why someone would leave a lucrative position with GSK for something with apparently dubious prospects.
Any ideas?
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantjp: This might appear to be a stupid question, but what, exactly, do they do? I checked out the Swan Lifestyle website, but there is nothing in terms of content there. This “hybrid business model” they tout/shill could be anything.
I understand the MLM concept, but don’t you have to have something in terms of a product or service in order to gull your “downline”?
Similar question to mine on BMIT. I’m not understanding why someone would leave a lucrative position with GSK for something with apparently dubious prospects.
Any ideas?
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantjp: This might appear to be a stupid question, but what, exactly, do they do? I checked out the Swan Lifestyle website, but there is nothing in terms of content there. This “hybrid business model” they tout/shill could be anything.
I understand the MLM concept, but don’t you have to have something in terms of a product or service in order to gull your “downline”?
Similar question to mine on BMIT. I’m not understanding why someone would leave a lucrative position with GSK for something with apparently dubious prospects.
Any ideas?
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantjp: This might appear to be a stupid question, but what, exactly, do they do? I checked out the Swan Lifestyle website, but there is nothing in terms of content there. This “hybrid business model” they tout/shill could be anything.
I understand the MLM concept, but don’t you have to have something in terms of a product or service in order to gull your “downline”?
Similar question to mine on BMIT. I’m not understanding why someone would leave a lucrative position with GSK for something with apparently dubious prospects.
Any ideas?
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantjp: This might appear to be a stupid question, but what, exactly, do they do? I checked out the Swan Lifestyle website, but there is nothing in terms of content there. This “hybrid business model” they tout/shill could be anything.
I understand the MLM concept, but don’t you have to have something in terms of a product or service in order to gull your “downline”?
Similar question to mine on BMIT. I’m not understanding why someone would leave a lucrative position with GSK for something with apparently dubious prospects.
Any ideas?
Allan from Fallbrook
ParticipantDan/CBad: Completely agree.
Once you start down the censorship slope, where do you stop? And who becomes the grand arbiter of what is right and what is wrong?
Discourse, like democracy, is messy, uncomfortable and ultimately liberating. Leave it be.
-
AuthorPosts
