Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Aecetia
ParticipantI think it must be the water. They are all crazy in the M.E.
Aecetia
ParticipantI think it must be the water. They are all crazy in the M.E.
Aecetia
ParticipantI think it must be the water. They are all crazy in the M.E.
Aecetia
ParticipantI think it must be the water. They are all crazy in the M.E.
Aecetia
ParticipantI think it must be the water. They are all crazy in the M.E.
August 19, 2010 at 4:15 PM in reply to: If you believe in the stock market buble, where do you park your money? #593580Aecetia
Participant“Today we got our first Hindenburg Omen confirmation. The number of new highs was 136, and new lows was at 69 (per the traditional WSJ source). Granted this particular criteria set was a little weak as the 69 is precisely on the borderline for confirmation (the 2.2%), and the new highs number was not more than double the new lows (although it was close). Less gating were the McClellan oscillator which was negative at -83.6, and the 10 week MVA, which rose, which were the two remaining conditions. The first omen was spotted on August 12 – a week later the H.O has been confirmed. The more confirmations, the scarier it gets from a technical perspective, not to mention the conversion into a self-fulfilling prophecy (like every other technical indicator).”
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/hindenburg-omen-confirmation-1
August 19, 2010 at 4:15 PM in reply to: If you believe in the stock market buble, where do you park your money? #593676Aecetia
Participant“Today we got our first Hindenburg Omen confirmation. The number of new highs was 136, and new lows was at 69 (per the traditional WSJ source). Granted this particular criteria set was a little weak as the 69 is precisely on the borderline for confirmation (the 2.2%), and the new highs number was not more than double the new lows (although it was close). Less gating were the McClellan oscillator which was negative at -83.6, and the 10 week MVA, which rose, which were the two remaining conditions. The first omen was spotted on August 12 – a week later the H.O has been confirmed. The more confirmations, the scarier it gets from a technical perspective, not to mention the conversion into a self-fulfilling prophecy (like every other technical indicator).”
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/hindenburg-omen-confirmation-1
August 19, 2010 at 4:15 PM in reply to: If you believe in the stock market buble, where do you park your money? #594212Aecetia
Participant“Today we got our first Hindenburg Omen confirmation. The number of new highs was 136, and new lows was at 69 (per the traditional WSJ source). Granted this particular criteria set was a little weak as the 69 is precisely on the borderline for confirmation (the 2.2%), and the new highs number was not more than double the new lows (although it was close). Less gating were the McClellan oscillator which was negative at -83.6, and the 10 week MVA, which rose, which were the two remaining conditions. The first omen was spotted on August 12 – a week later the H.O has been confirmed. The more confirmations, the scarier it gets from a technical perspective, not to mention the conversion into a self-fulfilling prophecy (like every other technical indicator).”
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/hindenburg-omen-confirmation-1
August 19, 2010 at 4:15 PM in reply to: If you believe in the stock market buble, where do you park your money? #594324Aecetia
Participant“Today we got our first Hindenburg Omen confirmation. The number of new highs was 136, and new lows was at 69 (per the traditional WSJ source). Granted this particular criteria set was a little weak as the 69 is precisely on the borderline for confirmation (the 2.2%), and the new highs number was not more than double the new lows (although it was close). Less gating were the McClellan oscillator which was negative at -83.6, and the 10 week MVA, which rose, which were the two remaining conditions. The first omen was spotted on August 12 – a week later the H.O has been confirmed. The more confirmations, the scarier it gets from a technical perspective, not to mention the conversion into a self-fulfilling prophecy (like every other technical indicator).”
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/hindenburg-omen-confirmation-1
August 19, 2010 at 4:15 PM in reply to: If you believe in the stock market buble, where do you park your money? #594634Aecetia
Participant“Today we got our first Hindenburg Omen confirmation. The number of new highs was 136, and new lows was at 69 (per the traditional WSJ source). Granted this particular criteria set was a little weak as the 69 is precisely on the borderline for confirmation (the 2.2%), and the new highs number was not more than double the new lows (although it was close). Less gating were the McClellan oscillator which was negative at -83.6, and the 10 week MVA, which rose, which were the two remaining conditions. The first omen was spotted on August 12 – a week later the H.O has been confirmed. The more confirmations, the scarier it gets from a technical perspective, not to mention the conversion into a self-fulfilling prophecy (like every other technical indicator).”
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/hindenburg-omen-confirmation-1
Aecetia
ParticipantDrop Pelosi on Iran.
Aecetia
ParticipantDrop Pelosi on Iran.
Aecetia
ParticipantDrop Pelosi on Iran.
Aecetia
ParticipantDrop Pelosi on Iran.
-
AuthorPosts
