[Aecetia]

Poll. The latest Rasmussen Poll shows 52 percent of Americans opposed to the health-care plan as “proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats,” with 45 percent in favor.

I agree with Brian regarding the big winner: corporate insurance. This is just Congress selling out again. But Brian you are too smart to think his treatment was free. The taxpayers paid for it. There is no free ride and you know it.

House Democrats said they are proud that they found a way to finance the health care package largely from a tax on the wealthy. There is, however, little appetite for a millionaire’s tax in the Senate, and some tax experts think it is a mistake to tap only rich people to pay for services used by all. (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120003647)

[Aecetia]

Fletcher Hills is a very nice area and not that far away from downtown, the beach, etc. There are nice restaurants and shopping centers in the immediate area, Costco is close. I think you made a good move. Congratulations!

[Aecetia]

Fletcher Hills is a very nice area and not that far away from downtown, the beach, etc. There are nice restaurants and shopping centers in the immediate area, Costco is close. I think you made a good move. Congratulations!

[Aecetia]

Fletcher Hills is a very nice area and not that far away from downtown, the beach, etc. There are nice restaurants and shopping centers in the immediate area, Costco is close. I think you made a good move. Congratulations!

[Aecetia]

Fletcher Hills is a very nice area and not that far away from downtown, the beach, etc. There are nice restaurants and shopping centers in the immediate area, Costco is close. I think you made a good move. Congratulations!

[Aecetia]

Fletcher Hills is a very nice area and not that far away from downtown, the beach, etc. There are nice restaurants and shopping centers in the immediate area, Costco is close. I think you made a good move. Congratulations!

[Aecetia]

Ditto what Allan says about Catholic schools. It is the academic rigorousness, not the religion. They do not teach to the slowest. The slowest can be tutored. They are not bogged down in political correctness either. Religion is not the point. It is academic discipline.

[Aecetia]

Ditto what Allan says about Catholic schools. It is the academic rigorousness, not the religion. They do not teach to the slowest. The slowest can be tutored. They are not bogged down in political correctness either. Religion is not the point. It is academic discipline.

[Aecetia]

Ditto what Allan says about Catholic schools. It is the academic rigorousness, not the religion. They do not teach to the slowest. The slowest can be tutored. They are not bogged down in political correctness either. Religion is not the point. It is academic discipline.

[Aecetia]

Ditto what Allan says about Catholic schools. It is the academic rigorousness, not the religion. They do not teach to the slowest. The slowest can be tutored. They are not bogged down in political correctness either. Religion is not the point. It is academic discipline.

[Aecetia]

Ditto what Allan says about Catholic schools. It is the academic rigorousness, not the religion. They do not teach to the slowest. The slowest can be tutored. They are not bogged down in political correctness either. Religion is not the point. It is academic discipline.

[Aecetia]

Brian,
Good thoughts, but even under Pelosi’s behemoth bill for corporate insurance lobbyists, not all will be insured. The whole matter is a boondoggle and needs to be scrapped. The Republicans supposedly have a proposal that would save money. The CBO says the R. plan would lower health care costs ($61 billion over 10 years). Mixed reviews on how many would be uninsured. Since many are uninsured by choice, (the young and the well) this number should not be a make or break. Put catastrophic coverage in for those people. Why can’t they combine the two and come up with a win win for all?

[Aecetia]

Brian,
Good thoughts, but even under Pelosi’s behemoth bill for corporate insurance lobbyists, not all will be insured. The whole matter is a boondoggle and needs to be scrapped. The Republicans supposedly have a proposal that would save money. The CBO says the R. plan would lower health care costs ($61 billion over 10 years). Mixed reviews on how many would be uninsured. Since many are uninsured by choice, (the young and the well) this number should not be a make or break. Put catastrophic coverage in for those people. Why can’t they combine the two and come up with a win win for all?

[Aecetia]

Brian,
Good thoughts, but even under Pelosi’s behemoth bill for corporate insurance lobbyists, not all will be insured. The whole matter is a boondoggle and needs to be scrapped. The Republicans supposedly have a proposal that would save money. The CBO says the R. plan would lower health care costs ($61 billion over 10 years). Mixed reviews on how many would be uninsured. Since many are uninsured by choice, (the young and the well) this number should not be a make or break. Put catastrophic coverage in for those people. Why can’t they combine the two and come up with a win win for all?

[Aecetia]

Brian,
Good thoughts, but even under Pelosi’s behemoth bill for corporate insurance lobbyists, not all will be insured. The whole matter is a boondoggle and needs to be scrapped. The Republicans supposedly have a proposal that would save money. The CBO says the R. plan would lower health care costs ($61 billion over 10 years). Mixed reviews on how many would be uninsured. Since many are uninsured by choice, (the young and the well) this number should not be a make or break. Put catastrophic coverage in for those people. Why can’t they combine the two and come up with a win win for all?

[Author]

Posts