Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
4plexownerParticipant
“We have enough resources in North America to create our own economy that is not in anyway reliant on the rest of the world at all.”
[img_assist|nid=12000|title=US oil imports|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=400|height=372]
“We have enough resources in North America” as long as you ignore the fact that we import more than 60% of the petroleum that we use …
4plexownerParticipant“We have enough resources in North America to create our own economy that is not in anyway reliant on the rest of the world at all.”
[img_assist|nid=12000|title=US oil imports|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=400|height=372]
“We have enough resources in North America” as long as you ignore the fact that we import more than 60% of the petroleum that we use …
4plexownerParticipant“We have enough resources in North America to create our own economy that is not in anyway reliant on the rest of the world at all.”
[img_assist|nid=12000|title=US oil imports|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=400|height=372]
“We have enough resources in North America” as long as you ignore the fact that we import more than 60% of the petroleum that we use …
4plexownerParticipant“We have enough resources in North America to create our own economy that is not in anyway reliant on the rest of the world at all.”
[img_assist|nid=12000|title=US oil imports|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=400|height=372]
“We have enough resources in North America” as long as you ignore the fact that we import more than 60% of the petroleum that we use …
September 28, 2009 at 7:25 AM in reply to: Homeowners who ‘strategically default’ on loans a growing problem #4616484plexownerParticipant“hopelessly upside down on a townhouse in San Marcos, he’s locked into a 9 % fixed rate, paying about $4500/mo for a 2 BR townhouse”
“those that don’t do it will be labeled as “suckers””
I have a hard time with the walk-away issue
the way I was raised makes me think that we should all honor the commitments we make – if you sign on the dotted line you should do everything in your power to honor that commitment
but then I read something like the first quote and think, “sucker!!!”
suckered into the housing bubble, suckered into taking on a too large mortgage payment, suckered into doing the ‘right thing’ by continuing to make payments on the mortgage – sucker!
logic tells me that the person being referred to will ultimately lose the townhouse so he might as well walk away (or at least stop making payments) before doing anymore damage to his finances
ethics vs logic – not an easy issue to resolve
September 28, 2009 at 7:25 AM in reply to: Homeowners who ‘strategically default’ on loans a growing problem #4618434plexownerParticipant“hopelessly upside down on a townhouse in San Marcos, he’s locked into a 9 % fixed rate, paying about $4500/mo for a 2 BR townhouse”
“those that don’t do it will be labeled as “suckers””
I have a hard time with the walk-away issue
the way I was raised makes me think that we should all honor the commitments we make – if you sign on the dotted line you should do everything in your power to honor that commitment
but then I read something like the first quote and think, “sucker!!!”
suckered into the housing bubble, suckered into taking on a too large mortgage payment, suckered into doing the ‘right thing’ by continuing to make payments on the mortgage – sucker!
logic tells me that the person being referred to will ultimately lose the townhouse so he might as well walk away (or at least stop making payments) before doing anymore damage to his finances
ethics vs logic – not an easy issue to resolve
September 28, 2009 at 7:25 AM in reply to: Homeowners who ‘strategically default’ on loans a growing problem #4621864plexownerParticipant“hopelessly upside down on a townhouse in San Marcos, he’s locked into a 9 % fixed rate, paying about $4500/mo for a 2 BR townhouse”
“those that don’t do it will be labeled as “suckers””
I have a hard time with the walk-away issue
the way I was raised makes me think that we should all honor the commitments we make – if you sign on the dotted line you should do everything in your power to honor that commitment
but then I read something like the first quote and think, “sucker!!!”
suckered into the housing bubble, suckered into taking on a too large mortgage payment, suckered into doing the ‘right thing’ by continuing to make payments on the mortgage – sucker!
logic tells me that the person being referred to will ultimately lose the townhouse so he might as well walk away (or at least stop making payments) before doing anymore damage to his finances
ethics vs logic – not an easy issue to resolve
September 28, 2009 at 7:25 AM in reply to: Homeowners who ‘strategically default’ on loans a growing problem #4622604plexownerParticipant“hopelessly upside down on a townhouse in San Marcos, he’s locked into a 9 % fixed rate, paying about $4500/mo for a 2 BR townhouse”
“those that don’t do it will be labeled as “suckers””
I have a hard time with the walk-away issue
the way I was raised makes me think that we should all honor the commitments we make – if you sign on the dotted line you should do everything in your power to honor that commitment
but then I read something like the first quote and think, “sucker!!!”
suckered into the housing bubble, suckered into taking on a too large mortgage payment, suckered into doing the ‘right thing’ by continuing to make payments on the mortgage – sucker!
logic tells me that the person being referred to will ultimately lose the townhouse so he might as well walk away (or at least stop making payments) before doing anymore damage to his finances
ethics vs logic – not an easy issue to resolve
September 28, 2009 at 7:25 AM in reply to: Homeowners who ‘strategically default’ on loans a growing problem #4624654plexownerParticipant“hopelessly upside down on a townhouse in San Marcos, he’s locked into a 9 % fixed rate, paying about $4500/mo for a 2 BR townhouse”
“those that don’t do it will be labeled as “suckers””
I have a hard time with the walk-away issue
the way I was raised makes me think that we should all honor the commitments we make – if you sign on the dotted line you should do everything in your power to honor that commitment
but then I read something like the first quote and think, “sucker!!!”
suckered into the housing bubble, suckered into taking on a too large mortgage payment, suckered into doing the ‘right thing’ by continuing to make payments on the mortgage – sucker!
logic tells me that the person being referred to will ultimately lose the townhouse so he might as well walk away (or at least stop making payments) before doing anymore damage to his finances
ethics vs logic – not an easy issue to resolve
September 27, 2009 at 12:44 PM in reply to: Have The Federal Reserve Or Prime Brokers Ever Tried To Manipulate The Stock Market? #4615534plexownerParticipantwasn’t disagreeing with you, Chris
just seemed that you were making the investment gains out to be a positive – like they were a side-effect and didn’t cost anything
September 27, 2009 at 12:44 PM in reply to: Have The Federal Reserve Or Prime Brokers Ever Tried To Manipulate The Stock Market? #4617474plexownerParticipantwasn’t disagreeing with you, Chris
just seemed that you were making the investment gains out to be a positive – like they were a side-effect and didn’t cost anything
September 27, 2009 at 12:44 PM in reply to: Have The Federal Reserve Or Prime Brokers Ever Tried To Manipulate The Stock Market? #4620914plexownerParticipantwasn’t disagreeing with you, Chris
just seemed that you were making the investment gains out to be a positive – like they were a side-effect and didn’t cost anything
September 27, 2009 at 12:44 PM in reply to: Have The Federal Reserve Or Prime Brokers Ever Tried To Manipulate The Stock Market? #4621654plexownerParticipantwasn’t disagreeing with you, Chris
just seemed that you were making the investment gains out to be a positive – like they were a side-effect and didn’t cost anything
September 27, 2009 at 12:44 PM in reply to: Have The Federal Reserve Or Prime Brokers Ever Tried To Manipulate The Stock Market? #4623704plexownerParticipantwasn’t disagreeing with you, Chris
just seemed that you were making the investment gains out to be a positive – like they were a side-effect and didn’t cost anything
-
AuthorPosts