Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 1, 2009 at 8:32 AM in reply to: CNBC Anchors Mortified that Ron Paul Was Allowed Air Time #357585March 1, 2009 at 8:32 AM in reply to: CNBC Anchors Mortified that Ron Paul Was Allowed Air Time #357887
34f3f3f
ParticipantWell, this sort of thing happens. The oddest things is when the reporter says we’ll be back when something really “substandard” is happening. I don’t think he meant to say “substantial”, because he would have corrected himself. He must have been referring to the declining situation in the current crisis. Unfortunate choice of words. Very amusing.
March 1, 2009 at 8:32 AM in reply to: CNBC Anchors Mortified that Ron Paul Was Allowed Air Time #35802834f3f3f
ParticipantWell, this sort of thing happens. The oddest things is when the reporter says we’ll be back when something really “substandard” is happening. I don’t think he meant to say “substantial”, because he would have corrected himself. He must have been referring to the declining situation in the current crisis. Unfortunate choice of words. Very amusing.
March 1, 2009 at 8:32 AM in reply to: CNBC Anchors Mortified that Ron Paul Was Allowed Air Time #35805934f3f3f
ParticipantWell, this sort of thing happens. The oddest things is when the reporter says we’ll be back when something really “substandard” is happening. I don’t think he meant to say “substantial”, because he would have corrected himself. He must have been referring to the declining situation in the current crisis. Unfortunate choice of words. Very amusing.
March 1, 2009 at 8:32 AM in reply to: CNBC Anchors Mortified that Ron Paul Was Allowed Air Time #35816434f3f3f
ParticipantWell, this sort of thing happens. The oddest things is when the reporter says we’ll be back when something really “substandard” is happening. I don’t think he meant to say “substantial”, because he would have corrected himself. He must have been referring to the declining situation in the current crisis. Unfortunate choice of words. Very amusing.
34f3f3f
ParticipantI’m not from California, and find it to be one of the friendliest places I have lived in. However, it varies from neighborhood to neighborhood. Generally, large cities like London, Paris and New York, you don’t say “Hi!” or smile at people, because they’ll think you’re nuts …which you are if you behave that way in places where populations are so much more dense and mixed. Can you imagine walking through Times Square and saying “Hi!” to every living soul you pass. I quickly adopted and adapted and make a point of being friendly. Traditionally, small communities all knew each other, and a stranger in town was always greeted, because the response told you a lot about that person. Getting shirty with people because they don’t respond in the way that you would like doesn’t solve anything. They may be from a big city, a different culture or both. Better to lead by example. If it’s lost on some people, that’s their loss.
34f3f3f
ParticipantI’m not from California, and find it to be one of the friendliest places I have lived in. However, it varies from neighborhood to neighborhood. Generally, large cities like London, Paris and New York, you don’t say “Hi!” or smile at people, because they’ll think you’re nuts …which you are if you behave that way in places where populations are so much more dense and mixed. Can you imagine walking through Times Square and saying “Hi!” to every living soul you pass. I quickly adopted and adapted and make a point of being friendly. Traditionally, small communities all knew each other, and a stranger in town was always greeted, because the response told you a lot about that person. Getting shirty with people because they don’t respond in the way that you would like doesn’t solve anything. They may be from a big city, a different culture or both. Better to lead by example. If it’s lost on some people, that’s their loss.
34f3f3f
ParticipantI’m not from California, and find it to be one of the friendliest places I have lived in. However, it varies from neighborhood to neighborhood. Generally, large cities like London, Paris and New York, you don’t say “Hi!” or smile at people, because they’ll think you’re nuts …which you are if you behave that way in places where populations are so much more dense and mixed. Can you imagine walking through Times Square and saying “Hi!” to every living soul you pass. I quickly adopted and adapted and make a point of being friendly. Traditionally, small communities all knew each other, and a stranger in town was always greeted, because the response told you a lot about that person. Getting shirty with people because they don’t respond in the way that you would like doesn’t solve anything. They may be from a big city, a different culture or both. Better to lead by example. If it’s lost on some people, that’s their loss.
34f3f3f
ParticipantI’m not from California, and find it to be one of the friendliest places I have lived in. However, it varies from neighborhood to neighborhood. Generally, large cities like London, Paris and New York, you don’t say “Hi!” or smile at people, because they’ll think you’re nuts …which you are if you behave that way in places where populations are so much more dense and mixed. Can you imagine walking through Times Square and saying “Hi!” to every living soul you pass. I quickly adopted and adapted and make a point of being friendly. Traditionally, small communities all knew each other, and a stranger in town was always greeted, because the response told you a lot about that person. Getting shirty with people because they don’t respond in the way that you would like doesn’t solve anything. They may be from a big city, a different culture or both. Better to lead by example. If it’s lost on some people, that’s their loss.
34f3f3f
ParticipantI’m not from California, and find it to be one of the friendliest places I have lived in. However, it varies from neighborhood to neighborhood. Generally, large cities like London, Paris and New York, you don’t say “Hi!” or smile at people, because they’ll think you’re nuts …which you are if you behave that way in places where populations are so much more dense and mixed. Can you imagine walking through Times Square and saying “Hi!” to every living soul you pass. I quickly adopted and adapted and make a point of being friendly. Traditionally, small communities all knew each other, and a stranger in town was always greeted, because the response told you a lot about that person. Getting shirty with people because they don’t respond in the way that you would like doesn’t solve anything. They may be from a big city, a different culture or both. Better to lead by example. If it’s lost on some people, that’s their loss.
34f3f3f
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Now I do believe we will see a much more uneven depreciation cycle. Not only is it defined by serious fragmention based on housing type and zip codes, but now I feel as if we will see a much more schizophrenic behavior with bouts of cyclical rallies that result in subsidies more then market strength. [/quote]
That’s seems to be playing out in Rich’s graphs, and I think it is happening now.
34f3f3f
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Now I do believe we will see a much more uneven depreciation cycle. Not only is it defined by serious fragmention based on housing type and zip codes, but now I feel as if we will see a much more schizophrenic behavior with bouts of cyclical rallies that result in subsidies more then market strength. [/quote]
That’s seems to be playing out in Rich’s graphs, and I think it is happening now.
34f3f3f
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Now I do believe we will see a much more uneven depreciation cycle. Not only is it defined by serious fragmention based on housing type and zip codes, but now I feel as if we will see a much more schizophrenic behavior with bouts of cyclical rallies that result in subsidies more then market strength. [/quote]
That’s seems to be playing out in Rich’s graphs, and I think it is happening now.
34f3f3f
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Now I do believe we will see a much more uneven depreciation cycle. Not only is it defined by serious fragmention based on housing type and zip codes, but now I feel as if we will see a much more schizophrenic behavior with bouts of cyclical rallies that result in subsidies more then market strength. [/quote]
That’s seems to be playing out in Rich’s graphs, and I think it is happening now.
34f3f3f
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Now I do believe we will see a much more uneven depreciation cycle. Not only is it defined by serious fragmention based on housing type and zip codes, but now I feel as if we will see a much more schizophrenic behavior with bouts of cyclical rallies that result in subsidies more then market strength. [/quote]
That’s seems to be playing out in Rich’s graphs, and I think it is happening now.
-
AuthorPosts
