[34f3f3f]

It always has been, and and always will. But I share in the weariness. Sometimes I think it’s just midlife crisis.

[34f3f3f]

It always has been, and and always will. But I share in the weariness. Sometimes I think it’s just midlife crisis.

[34f3f3f]

It always has been, and and always will. But I share in the weariness. Sometimes I think it’s just midlife crisis.

[34f3f3f]

It always has been, and and always will. But I share in the weariness. Sometimes I think it’s just midlife crisis.

[34f3f3f]

It always has been, and and always will. But I share in the weariness. Sometimes I think it’s just midlife crisis.

[34f3f3f]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego]
5. The Government, including the Military is bloated by large number of inefficient government bureaucrats. Outsource a large percentage of vital operations and efficient private enterprise

From what I see, the only potential candidates for 2012 that can truly implement this manifesto are Rush Limbaugh and/or Sarah Palin.
[/quote]

I agree that if Palin becomes President, the presidency should be outsourced. Makes sense to me.

[34f3f3f]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego]
5. The Government, including the Military is bloated by large number of inefficient government bureaucrats. Outsource a large percentage of vital operations and efficient private enterprise

From what I see, the only potential candidates for 2012 that can truly implement this manifesto are Rush Limbaugh and/or Sarah Palin.
[/quote]

I agree that if Palin becomes President, the presidency should be outsourced. Makes sense to me.

[34f3f3f]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego]
5. The Government, including the Military is bloated by large number of inefficient government bureaucrats. Outsource a large percentage of vital operations and efficient private enterprise

From what I see, the only potential candidates for 2012 that can truly implement this manifesto are Rush Limbaugh and/or Sarah Palin.
[/quote]

I agree that if Palin becomes President, the presidency should be outsourced. Makes sense to me.

[34f3f3f]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego]
5. The Government, including the Military is bloated by large number of inefficient government bureaucrats. Outsource a large percentage of vital operations and efficient private enterprise

From what I see, the only potential candidates for 2012 that can truly implement this manifesto are Rush Limbaugh and/or Sarah Palin.
[/quote]

I agree that if Palin becomes President, the presidency should be outsourced. Makes sense to me.

[34f3f3f]

[quote=NewtoSanDiego]
5. The Government, including the Military is bloated by large number of inefficient government bureaucrats. Outsource a large percentage of vital operations and efficient private enterprise

From what I see, the only potential candidates for 2012 that can truly implement this manifesto are Rush Limbaugh and/or Sarah Palin.
[/quote]

I agree that if Palin becomes President, the presidency should be outsourced. Makes sense to me.

[34f3f3f]

You’d expect there to be a balancing period where insurers and the health care administrators juggle the numbers until the penalty option no longer becomes viable. Universal health care, in one shape or another, is very likely going to become a thing of the future, and transitioning may be a little bumpy, but the US will be the better for it. It may not be a perfect solution, but it will provide more cover to more people, by reducing costs which is really what this is all about. The inverse is true for the current (now past) system, which was headed in the wrong direction. It will all be water under the bridge in a few years, and the bill’s detractors will eventually acquiesce. The task for the future, will then be to ensure future voters make health care a priority to keep future governments on their toes. What will be interesting is, who will be better at it, the Republicans or the Democrats, and will this change the political landscape?

[34f3f3f]

You’d expect there to be a balancing period where insurers and the health care administrators juggle the numbers until the penalty option no longer becomes viable. Universal health care, in one shape or another, is very likely going to become a thing of the future, and transitioning may be a little bumpy, but the US will be the better for it. It may not be a perfect solution, but it will provide more cover to more people, by reducing costs which is really what this is all about. The inverse is true for the current (now past) system, which was headed in the wrong direction. It will all be water under the bridge in a few years, and the bill’s detractors will eventually acquiesce. The task for the future, will then be to ensure future voters make health care a priority to keep future governments on their toes. What will be interesting is, who will be better at it, the Republicans or the Democrats, and will this change the political landscape?

[34f3f3f]

You’d expect there to be a balancing period where insurers and the health care administrators juggle the numbers until the penalty option no longer becomes viable. Universal health care, in one shape or another, is very likely going to become a thing of the future, and transitioning may be a little bumpy, but the US will be the better for it. It may not be a perfect solution, but it will provide more cover to more people, by reducing costs which is really what this is all about. The inverse is true for the current (now past) system, which was headed in the wrong direction. It will all be water under the bridge in a few years, and the bill’s detractors will eventually acquiesce. The task for the future, will then be to ensure future voters make health care a priority to keep future governments on their toes. What will be interesting is, who will be better at it, the Republicans or the Democrats, and will this change the political landscape?

[34f3f3f]

You’d expect there to be a balancing period where insurers and the health care administrators juggle the numbers until the penalty option no longer becomes viable. Universal health care, in one shape or another, is very likely going to become a thing of the future, and transitioning may be a little bumpy, but the US will be the better for it. It may not be a perfect solution, but it will provide more cover to more people, by reducing costs which is really what this is all about. The inverse is true for the current (now past) system, which was headed in the wrong direction. It will all be water under the bridge in a few years, and the bill’s detractors will eventually acquiesce. The task for the future, will then be to ensure future voters make health care a priority to keep future governments on their toes. What will be interesting is, who will be better at it, the Republicans or the Democrats, and will this change the political landscape?

[34f3f3f]

You’d expect there to be a balancing period where insurers and the health care administrators juggle the numbers until the penalty option no longer becomes viable. Universal health care, in one shape or another, is very likely going to become a thing of the future, and transitioning may be a little bumpy, but the US will be the better for it. It may not be a perfect solution, but it will provide more cover to more people, by reducing costs which is really what this is all about. The inverse is true for the current (now past) system, which was headed in the wrong direction. It will all be water under the bridge in a few years, and the bill’s detractors will eventually acquiesce. The task for the future, will then be to ensure future voters make health care a priority to keep future governments on their toes. What will be interesting is, who will be better at it, the Republicans or the Democrats, and will this change the political landscape?

[Author]

Posts