- This topic has 150 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by
(former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 20, 2007 at 3:02 PM #102048November 20, 2007 at 3:17 PM #101935
cr
ParticipantHey everyone look! It’s Mr. Hyde!
Can’t say I missed him, but he’s back with another ridiculous, and this time hypocritical post.
Dare I go back and find every post you made making the same claims you are now criticizing everyone for?
Think before you post Devil_Angel.
November 20, 2007 at 3:17 PM #102016ParticipantHey everyone look! It’s Mr. Hyde!
Can’t say I missed him, but he’s back with another ridiculous, and this time hypocritical post.
Dare I go back and find every post you made making the same claims you are now criticizing everyone for?
Think before you post Devil_Angel.
November 20, 2007 at 3:17 PM #102027ParticipantHey everyone look! It’s Mr. Hyde!
Can’t say I missed him, but he’s back with another ridiculous, and this time hypocritical post.
Dare I go back and find every post you made making the same claims you are now criticizing everyone for?
Think before you post Devil_Angel.
November 20, 2007 at 3:17 PM #102049ParticipantHey everyone look! It’s Mr. Hyde!
Can’t say I missed him, but he’s back with another ridiculous, and this time hypocritical post.
Dare I go back and find every post you made making the same claims you are now criticizing everyone for?
Think before you post Devil_Angel.
November 20, 2007 at 3:17 PM #102078ParticipantHey everyone look! It’s Mr. Hyde!
Can’t say I missed him, but he’s back with another ridiculous, and this time hypocritical post.
Dare I go back and find every post you made making the same claims you are now criticizing everyone for?
Think before you post Devil_Angel.
November 20, 2007 at 3:36 PM #10197034f3f3f
ParticipantNot sure I really understand this post. On the one hand bloggers are to congratulate themselves for being right, but on the hand they are inconsistent for not critiquing the information that now affirms their long held views.
November 20, 2007 at 3:36 PM #102051ParticipantNot sure I really understand this post. On the one hand bloggers are to congratulate themselves for being right, but on the hand they are inconsistent for not critiquing the information that now affirms their long held views.
November 20, 2007 at 3:36 PM #102062ParticipantNot sure I really understand this post. On the one hand bloggers are to congratulate themselves for being right, but on the hand they are inconsistent for not critiquing the information that now affirms their long held views.
November 20, 2007 at 3:36 PM #102085ParticipantNot sure I really understand this post. On the one hand bloggers are to congratulate themselves for being right, but on the hand they are inconsistent for not critiquing the information that now affirms their long held views.
November 20, 2007 at 3:36 PM #102114ParticipantNot sure I really understand this post. On the one hand bloggers are to congratulate themselves for being right, but on the hand they are inconsistent for not critiquing the information that now affirms their long held views.
November 20, 2007 at 5:04 PM #102050(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantOn the one hand bloggers are to congratulate themselves for being right, but on the hand they are inconsistent for not critiquing the information that now affirms their long held views. – good point.
Alex_angel. I don’t think we get it yet.
Maybe you can clarify by answering the following simple question:How can you not be inconsistent when misinterpreting the improperly researched articles by the mass media irregardless of whether or not they fit or do not fit outside your current point of view ?
November 20, 2007 at 5:04 PM #102131ParticipantOn the one hand bloggers are to congratulate themselves for being right, but on the hand they are inconsistent for not critiquing the information that now affirms their long held views. – good point.
Alex_angel. I don’t think we get it yet.
Maybe you can clarify by answering the following simple question:How can you not be inconsistent when misinterpreting the improperly researched articles by the mass media irregardless of whether or not they fit or do not fit outside your current point of view ?
November 20, 2007 at 5:04 PM #102140ParticipantOn the one hand bloggers are to congratulate themselves for being right, but on the hand they are inconsistent for not critiquing the information that now affirms their long held views. – good point.
Alex_angel. I don’t think we get it yet.
Maybe you can clarify by answering the following simple question:How can you not be inconsistent when misinterpreting the improperly researched articles by the mass media irregardless of whether or not they fit or do not fit outside your current point of view ?
November 20, 2007 at 5:04 PM #102164ParticipantOn the one hand bloggers are to congratulate themselves for being right, but on the hand they are inconsistent for not critiquing the information that now affirms their long held views. – good point.
Alex_angel. I don’t think we get it yet.
Maybe you can clarify by answering the following simple question:How can you not be inconsistent when misinterpreting the improperly researched articles by the mass media irregardless of whether or not they fit or do not fit outside your current point of view ?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.