- This topic has 35 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by 4plexowner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 21, 2007 at 6:30 AM #10967November 21, 2007 at 7:46 AM #102342TheBreezeParticipant
That was an eye-opening article. I didn’t realize that Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee $4.8 trillion in mortgages (40% of the total outstanding). I wish the government would get the hell out of the mortgage business. Our own government through Fannie and Freddie is a huge reason we are in this mess.
I almost LOLed when I saw that Freddie had $34 billion in capital. Assuming they own or are guaranteeing half that $4.8 trillion total, then that’s $34 billion in capital backing $2.4 trillion in mortgages. That’s a capital reserve of 1.4% of what they are backing. Ridiculous.
Freddie is also counting on only a 5% decline in housing values from the peak. I would characterize that as willful denial. Freddie and Fannie have to be two of the worst-run organizations in the world.
November 21, 2007 at 7:46 AM #102419TheBreezeParticipantThat was an eye-opening article. I didn’t realize that Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee $4.8 trillion in mortgages (40% of the total outstanding). I wish the government would get the hell out of the mortgage business. Our own government through Fannie and Freddie is a huge reason we are in this mess.
I almost LOLed when I saw that Freddie had $34 billion in capital. Assuming they own or are guaranteeing half that $4.8 trillion total, then that’s $34 billion in capital backing $2.4 trillion in mortgages. That’s a capital reserve of 1.4% of what they are backing. Ridiculous.
Freddie is also counting on only a 5% decline in housing values from the peak. I would characterize that as willful denial. Freddie and Fannie have to be two of the worst-run organizations in the world.
November 21, 2007 at 7:46 AM #102431TheBreezeParticipantThat was an eye-opening article. I didn’t realize that Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee $4.8 trillion in mortgages (40% of the total outstanding). I wish the government would get the hell out of the mortgage business. Our own government through Fannie and Freddie is a huge reason we are in this mess.
I almost LOLed when I saw that Freddie had $34 billion in capital. Assuming they own or are guaranteeing half that $4.8 trillion total, then that’s $34 billion in capital backing $2.4 trillion in mortgages. That’s a capital reserve of 1.4% of what they are backing. Ridiculous.
Freddie is also counting on only a 5% decline in housing values from the peak. I would characterize that as willful denial. Freddie and Fannie have to be two of the worst-run organizations in the world.
November 21, 2007 at 7:46 AM #102455TheBreezeParticipantThat was an eye-opening article. I didn’t realize that Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee $4.8 trillion in mortgages (40% of the total outstanding). I wish the government would get the hell out of the mortgage business. Our own government through Fannie and Freddie is a huge reason we are in this mess.
I almost LOLed when I saw that Freddie had $34 billion in capital. Assuming they own or are guaranteeing half that $4.8 trillion total, then that’s $34 billion in capital backing $2.4 trillion in mortgages. That’s a capital reserve of 1.4% of what they are backing. Ridiculous.
Freddie is also counting on only a 5% decline in housing values from the peak. I would characterize that as willful denial. Freddie and Fannie have to be two of the worst-run organizations in the world.
November 21, 2007 at 7:46 AM #102483TheBreezeParticipantThat was an eye-opening article. I didn’t realize that Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee $4.8 trillion in mortgages (40% of the total outstanding). I wish the government would get the hell out of the mortgage business. Our own government through Fannie and Freddie is a huge reason we are in this mess.
I almost LOLed when I saw that Freddie had $34 billion in capital. Assuming they own or are guaranteeing half that $4.8 trillion total, then that’s $34 billion in capital backing $2.4 trillion in mortgages. That’s a capital reserve of 1.4% of what they are backing. Ridiculous.
Freddie is also counting on only a 5% decline in housing values from the peak. I would characterize that as willful denial. Freddie and Fannie have to be two of the worst-run organizations in the world.
November 21, 2007 at 9:39 AM #102412kev374Participantis it possible for the government to use taxpayer money to bail out a GSE? I thought GSEs are self-supporting enterprises but just managed by the government. They don’t use taxpayer money for costs.
November 21, 2007 at 9:39 AM #102489kev374Participantis it possible for the government to use taxpayer money to bail out a GSE? I thought GSEs are self-supporting enterprises but just managed by the government. They don’t use taxpayer money for costs.
November 21, 2007 at 9:39 AM #102501kev374Participantis it possible for the government to use taxpayer money to bail out a GSE? I thought GSEs are self-supporting enterprises but just managed by the government. They don’t use taxpayer money for costs.
November 21, 2007 at 9:39 AM #102525kev374Participantis it possible for the government to use taxpayer money to bail out a GSE? I thought GSEs are self-supporting enterprises but just managed by the government. They don’t use taxpayer money for costs.
November 21, 2007 at 9:39 AM #102552kev374Participantis it possible for the government to use taxpayer money to bail out a GSE? I thought GSEs are self-supporting enterprises but just managed by the government. They don’t use taxpayer money for costs.
November 21, 2007 at 10:14 AM #102560bsrsharmaParticipant"counting on only a 5% decline"
I suspect that is the trigger that will initiate the chain reaction that will eventually meltdown Fannie & Freddie. Any moron can see that there will be much more than 5% decline. When Fannie & Freddie fail, the catastrophic consequences will make the current problems seem minor. If the treasury tries to intervene and help, the virus can easily jump to treasuries, causing a $ collapse. 2008 will be one scary year.
November 21, 2007 at 10:14 AM #102589bsrsharmaParticipant"counting on only a 5% decline"
I suspect that is the trigger that will initiate the chain reaction that will eventually meltdown Fannie & Freddie. Any moron can see that there will be much more than 5% decline. When Fannie & Freddie fail, the catastrophic consequences will make the current problems seem minor. If the treasury tries to intervene and help, the virus can easily jump to treasuries, causing a $ collapse. 2008 will be one scary year.
November 21, 2007 at 10:14 AM #102536bsrsharmaParticipant"counting on only a 5% decline"
I suspect that is the trigger that will initiate the chain reaction that will eventually meltdown Fannie & Freddie. Any moron can see that there will be much more than 5% decline. When Fannie & Freddie fail, the catastrophic consequences will make the current problems seem minor. If the treasury tries to intervene and help, the virus can easily jump to treasuries, causing a $ collapse. 2008 will be one scary year.
November 21, 2007 at 10:14 AM #102524bsrsharmaParticipant"counting on only a 5% decline"
I suspect that is the trigger that will initiate the chain reaction that will eventually meltdown Fannie & Freddie. Any moron can see that there will be much more than 5% decline. When Fannie & Freddie fail, the catastrophic consequences will make the current problems seem minor. If the treasury tries to intervene and help, the virus can easily jump to treasuries, causing a $ collapse. 2008 will be one scary year.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.