- This topic has 51 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 3 months ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 20, 2007 at 9:19 PM #78685August 20, 2007 at 9:35 PM #78560CostaMesaParticipant
eye-pod – have you got anything better to contribute to the discussion than some weak personal attack towards me for merely pointing out the blatantly obvious? That you choose to characterize it as ‘political’ only underscores the silly yet nasty intent.
On topic…
I think comparisons to precious metals are somewhat silly. Once the specialty PGMs are taken out of the equation (Pd an Rh that both have unique industrial uses) then the average doubling of the precious metals in the last handful of years hardly compares to the quadrupling of housing values during the same time.
Lookup ‘Johnson-Matthey’ for the definition of the acronym.
August 20, 2007 at 9:35 PM #78709CostaMesaParticipanteye-pod – have you got anything better to contribute to the discussion than some weak personal attack towards me for merely pointing out the blatantly obvious? That you choose to characterize it as ‘political’ only underscores the silly yet nasty intent.
On topic…
I think comparisons to precious metals are somewhat silly. Once the specialty PGMs are taken out of the equation (Pd an Rh that both have unique industrial uses) then the average doubling of the precious metals in the last handful of years hardly compares to the quadrupling of housing values during the same time.
Lookup ‘Johnson-Matthey’ for the definition of the acronym.
August 20, 2007 at 9:35 PM #78688CostaMesaParticipanteye-pod – have you got anything better to contribute to the discussion than some weak personal attack towards me for merely pointing out the blatantly obvious? That you choose to characterize it as ‘political’ only underscores the silly yet nasty intent.
On topic…
I think comparisons to precious metals are somewhat silly. Once the specialty PGMs are taken out of the equation (Pd an Rh that both have unique industrial uses) then the average doubling of the precious metals in the last handful of years hardly compares to the quadrupling of housing values during the same time.
Lookup ‘Johnson-Matthey’ for the definition of the acronym.
August 20, 2007 at 9:35 PM #78563kewpParticipantI guess we can all look forward to 25% raises each year from now on? WOOHOO!!!!!
August 20, 2007 at 9:35 PM #78712kewpParticipantI guess we can all look forward to 25% raises each year from now on? WOOHOO!!!!!
August 20, 2007 at 9:35 PM #78691kewpParticipantI guess we can all look forward to 25% raises each year from now on? WOOHOO!!!!!
August 20, 2007 at 11:42 PM #78645kev374ParticipantAuthor has lost his marbles, what baloney!
August 20, 2007 at 11:42 PM #78776kev374ParticipantAuthor has lost his marbles, what baloney!
August 20, 2007 at 11:42 PM #78796kev374ParticipantAuthor has lost his marbles, what baloney!
August 21, 2007 at 8:45 AM #78675(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI think most here would agree that the dollar has lost value relative to precious metals and other currencies during the last 7 years. I think the author is stretching this point to a ridiculous limit, however.
A valid point, though, is that tangible assets tend to appreciate significantly when currency declines. This includes precious metals, commodities and real estate.
August 21, 2007 at 8:45 AM #78805(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI think most here would agree that the dollar has lost value relative to precious metals and other currencies during the last 7 years. I think the author is stretching this point to a ridiculous limit, however.
A valid point, though, is that tangible assets tend to appreciate significantly when currency declines. This includes precious metals, commodities and real estate.
August 21, 2007 at 8:45 AM #78826(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI think most here would agree that the dollar has lost value relative to precious metals and other currencies during the last 7 years. I think the author is stretching this point to a ridiculous limit, however.
A valid point, though, is that tangible assets tend to appreciate significantly when currency declines. This includes precious metals, commodities and real estate.
August 21, 2007 at 8:53 AM #78681kev374ParticipantA valid point, though, is that tangible assets tend to appreciate significantly when currency declines. This includes precious metals, commodities and real estate.
Yes, but demand for Real Estate is local for the most part and local demand is support by currency that is earned locally. If the dollar declines in value against other currencies it doesn’t mean there is simultaneous wage inflation which is what supports RE purchase fundamentals.
Infact, even though the dollar has been declining, wages have been stagnant. This doesn’t support Real Estate appreciation, which is directly correlated with local wages.
August 21, 2007 at 8:53 AM #78811kev374ParticipantA valid point, though, is that tangible assets tend to appreciate significantly when currency declines. This includes precious metals, commodities and real estate.
Yes, but demand for Real Estate is local for the most part and local demand is support by currency that is earned locally. If the dollar declines in value against other currencies it doesn’t mean there is simultaneous wage inflation which is what supports RE purchase fundamentals.
Infact, even though the dollar has been declining, wages have been stagnant. This doesn’t support Real Estate appreciation, which is directly correlated with local wages.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.