- This topic has 30 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 9, 2010 at 11:28 AM #511864February 9, 2010 at 2:20 PM #511296UCGalParticipant
I just came across an example of what you probably saw… a little public database record diving gave the story…
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100007977-6638_Wellesly_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92122
New listing – for $585k. On the comments jpinpb had noted it was shadow inventory emerging.. She’d previously noted an NOD on it.
I checked redfin and it showed a sale that didn’t show on sdlookup. On 2/1/2010 it sold for $626k.
So I looked up the property tax records using the APN on the listing.
(sdtreastax.com)
Then I took the name from the property taxes and did a grant deed lookup on that name.Bingo – there was a trustees deed on 2/1.
Since it didn’t show in fidelityasap.com (I’ve been tracking University City pretty closely – I’m pretty sure I would have seen it) I assume it was a deed in lieue of forclosure. But I could be completely wrong.Regardless, it’s a house that is now on the market and not in the shadows. Bank owned. Listed for $30k less than it was “sold” for in the trustee deed transaction.
February 9, 2010 at 2:20 PM #512202UCGalParticipantI just came across an example of what you probably saw… a little public database record diving gave the story…
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100007977-6638_Wellesly_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92122
New listing – for $585k. On the comments jpinpb had noted it was shadow inventory emerging.. She’d previously noted an NOD on it.
I checked redfin and it showed a sale that didn’t show on sdlookup. On 2/1/2010 it sold for $626k.
So I looked up the property tax records using the APN on the listing.
(sdtreastax.com)
Then I took the name from the property taxes and did a grant deed lookup on that name.Bingo – there was a trustees deed on 2/1.
Since it didn’t show in fidelityasap.com (I’ve been tracking University City pretty closely – I’m pretty sure I would have seen it) I assume it was a deed in lieue of forclosure. But I could be completely wrong.Regardless, it’s a house that is now on the market and not in the shadows. Bank owned. Listed for $30k less than it was “sold” for in the trustee deed transaction.
February 9, 2010 at 2:20 PM #511949UCGalParticipantI just came across an example of what you probably saw… a little public database record diving gave the story…
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100007977-6638_Wellesly_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92122
New listing – for $585k. On the comments jpinpb had noted it was shadow inventory emerging.. She’d previously noted an NOD on it.
I checked redfin and it showed a sale that didn’t show on sdlookup. On 2/1/2010 it sold for $626k.
So I looked up the property tax records using the APN on the listing.
(sdtreastax.com)
Then I took the name from the property taxes and did a grant deed lookup on that name.Bingo – there was a trustees deed on 2/1.
Since it didn’t show in fidelityasap.com (I’ve been tracking University City pretty closely – I’m pretty sure I would have seen it) I assume it was a deed in lieue of forclosure. But I could be completely wrong.Regardless, it’s a house that is now on the market and not in the shadows. Bank owned. Listed for $30k less than it was “sold” for in the trustee deed transaction.
February 9, 2010 at 2:20 PM #511855UCGalParticipantI just came across an example of what you probably saw… a little public database record diving gave the story…
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100007977-6638_Wellesly_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92122
New listing – for $585k. On the comments jpinpb had noted it was shadow inventory emerging.. She’d previously noted an NOD on it.
I checked redfin and it showed a sale that didn’t show on sdlookup. On 2/1/2010 it sold for $626k.
So I looked up the property tax records using the APN on the listing.
(sdtreastax.com)
Then I took the name from the property taxes and did a grant deed lookup on that name.Bingo – there was a trustees deed on 2/1.
Since it didn’t show in fidelityasap.com (I’ve been tracking University City pretty closely – I’m pretty sure I would have seen it) I assume it was a deed in lieue of forclosure. But I could be completely wrong.Regardless, it’s a house that is now on the market and not in the shadows. Bank owned. Listed for $30k less than it was “sold” for in the trustee deed transaction.
February 9, 2010 at 2:20 PM #511442UCGalParticipantI just came across an example of what you probably saw… a little public database record diving gave the story…
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100007977-6638_Wellesly_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92122
New listing – for $585k. On the comments jpinpb had noted it was shadow inventory emerging.. She’d previously noted an NOD on it.
I checked redfin and it showed a sale that didn’t show on sdlookup. On 2/1/2010 it sold for $626k.
So I looked up the property tax records using the APN on the listing.
(sdtreastax.com)
Then I took the name from the property taxes and did a grant deed lookup on that name.Bingo – there was a trustees deed on 2/1.
Since it didn’t show in fidelityasap.com (I’ve been tracking University City pretty closely – I’m pretty sure I would have seen it) I assume it was a deed in lieue of forclosure. But I could be completely wrong.Regardless, it’s a house that is now on the market and not in the shadows. Bank owned. Listed for $30k less than it was “sold” for in the trustee deed transaction.
February 9, 2010 at 2:48 PM #511870afirsthomeownerParticipantAh, that sounds right… Thanks for your enlightening help.
February 9, 2010 at 2:48 PM #511457afirsthomeownerParticipantAh, that sounds right… Thanks for your enlightening help.
February 9, 2010 at 2:48 PM #511964afirsthomeownerParticipantAh, that sounds right… Thanks for your enlightening help.
February 9, 2010 at 2:48 PM #511311afirsthomeownerParticipantAh, that sounds right… Thanks for your enlightening help.
February 9, 2010 at 2:48 PM #512217afirsthomeownerParticipantAh, that sounds right… Thanks for your enlightening help.
February 9, 2010 at 5:22 PM #511540briansd1Guestgood work UCGal. If only most buyers took the time to know their local markets….
February 9, 2010 at 5:22 PM #511953briansd1Guestgood work UCGal. If only most buyers took the time to know their local markets….
February 9, 2010 at 5:22 PM #512048briansd1Guestgood work UCGal. If only most buyers took the time to know their local markets….
February 9, 2010 at 5:22 PM #511394briansd1Guestgood work UCGal. If only most buyers took the time to know their local markets….
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.