- This topic has 70 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by Multiplepropertyowner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 6, 2008 at 3:15 PM #165459March 6, 2008 at 3:26 PM #165463SD TransplantParticipant
Where would we be w/out a bail out?
1) In real terms, Granite countertops will be 50% more devalued as an “investment” than the mighty dollar – which is continuously plunging.
2) Just about now, the phrase “now, with so much inventory, it is the best time to buy a place” would be forbidden.
3) The majority of the RE articles in the MSM would be related to “why renting makes sense” and ” mobility is key to find good employment in a prolonged recession”
4) Irrational exuberance would have a true new meaning – such as a test required to pass the Broker’s license exam.
5) Your neighboorhood Bank would ask you to pick a house for 1/2 of what you are currently paying for rent w/out a lease/contract (as long as someone take care of the place)
6) The mediocre realtors will be looking for ways to get back to a Community College – but the budgets are cut – and there is a waiting list to take any math, finance, or econ classes.
7) Taking the dog out for a walk is a challenge because your pet is too distracted by the pets left behind in your neighboorhood – as a result of irresponsible investors.
I could go on & on…..but I’ll let the rest of you continue.
March 6, 2008 at 3:26 PM #165567SD TransplantParticipantWhere would we be w/out a bail out?
1) In real terms, Granite countertops will be 50% more devalued as an “investment” than the mighty dollar – which is continuously plunging.
2) Just about now, the phrase “now, with so much inventory, it is the best time to buy a place” would be forbidden.
3) The majority of the RE articles in the MSM would be related to “why renting makes sense” and ” mobility is key to find good employment in a prolonged recession”
4) Irrational exuberance would have a true new meaning – such as a test required to pass the Broker’s license exam.
5) Your neighboorhood Bank would ask you to pick a house for 1/2 of what you are currently paying for rent w/out a lease/contract (as long as someone take care of the place)
6) The mediocre realtors will be looking for ways to get back to a Community College – but the budgets are cut – and there is a waiting list to take any math, finance, or econ classes.
7) Taking the dog out for a walk is a challenge because your pet is too distracted by the pets left behind in your neighboorhood – as a result of irresponsible investors.
I could go on & on…..but I’ll let the rest of you continue.
March 6, 2008 at 3:26 PM #165479SD TransplantParticipantWhere would we be w/out a bail out?
1) In real terms, Granite countertops will be 50% more devalued as an “investment” than the mighty dollar – which is continuously plunging.
2) Just about now, the phrase “now, with so much inventory, it is the best time to buy a place” would be forbidden.
3) The majority of the RE articles in the MSM would be related to “why renting makes sense” and ” mobility is key to find good employment in a prolonged recession”
4) Irrational exuberance would have a true new meaning – such as a test required to pass the Broker’s license exam.
5) Your neighboorhood Bank would ask you to pick a house for 1/2 of what you are currently paying for rent w/out a lease/contract (as long as someone take care of the place)
6) The mediocre realtors will be looking for ways to get back to a Community College – but the budgets are cut – and there is a waiting list to take any math, finance, or econ classes.
7) Taking the dog out for a walk is a challenge because your pet is too distracted by the pets left behind in your neighboorhood – as a result of irresponsible investors.
I could go on & on…..but I’ll let the rest of you continue.
March 6, 2008 at 3:26 PM #165475SD TransplantParticipantWhere would we be w/out a bail out?
1) In real terms, Granite countertops will be 50% more devalued as an “investment” than the mighty dollar – which is continuously plunging.
2) Just about now, the phrase “now, with so much inventory, it is the best time to buy a place” would be forbidden.
3) The majority of the RE articles in the MSM would be related to “why renting makes sense” and ” mobility is key to find good employment in a prolonged recession”
4) Irrational exuberance would have a true new meaning – such as a test required to pass the Broker’s license exam.
5) Your neighboorhood Bank would ask you to pick a house for 1/2 of what you are currently paying for rent w/out a lease/contract (as long as someone take care of the place)
6) The mediocre realtors will be looking for ways to get back to a Community College – but the budgets are cut – and there is a waiting list to take any math, finance, or econ classes.
7) Taking the dog out for a walk is a challenge because your pet is too distracted by the pets left behind in your neighboorhood – as a result of irresponsible investors.
I could go on & on…..but I’ll let the rest of you continue.
March 6, 2008 at 3:26 PM #165150SD TransplantParticipantWhere would we be w/out a bail out?
1) In real terms, Granite countertops will be 50% more devalued as an “investment” than the mighty dollar – which is continuously plunging.
2) Just about now, the phrase “now, with so much inventory, it is the best time to buy a place” would be forbidden.
3) The majority of the RE articles in the MSM would be related to “why renting makes sense” and ” mobility is key to find good employment in a prolonged recession”
4) Irrational exuberance would have a true new meaning – such as a test required to pass the Broker’s license exam.
5) Your neighboorhood Bank would ask you to pick a house for 1/2 of what you are currently paying for rent w/out a lease/contract (as long as someone take care of the place)
6) The mediocre realtors will be looking for ways to get back to a Community College – but the budgets are cut – and there is a waiting list to take any math, finance, or econ classes.
7) Taking the dog out for a walk is a challenge because your pet is too distracted by the pets left behind in your neighboorhood – as a result of irresponsible investors.
I could go on & on…..but I’ll let the rest of you continue.
March 6, 2008 at 4:44 PM #165581nostradamusParticipantLOL, SDT. I like the “mobility” part of item 3. It does sound like a headline!
March 6, 2008 at 4:44 PM #165478nostradamusParticipantLOL, SDT. I like the “mobility” part of item 3. It does sound like a headline!
March 6, 2008 at 4:44 PM #165165nostradamusParticipantLOL, SDT. I like the “mobility” part of item 3. It does sound like a headline!
March 6, 2008 at 4:44 PM #165491nostradamusParticipantLOL, SDT. I like the “mobility” part of item 3. It does sound like a headline!
March 6, 2008 at 4:44 PM #165494nostradamusParticipantLOL, SDT. I like the “mobility” part of item 3. It does sound like a headline!
March 6, 2008 at 4:51 PM #165175svelteParticipantI believe the White House was against the plan to raise the limits, but agreed to allow it to get the rest of the package passed. Obviously Paulson and company did not see the risks.
So the Bush Administration did indeed sign on the dotted line for raising the limits. Anybody can say anything, but it’s not until the signature hits the paper does it really matter.
March 6, 2008 at 4:51 PM #165591svelteParticipantI believe the White House was against the plan to raise the limits, but agreed to allow it to get the rest of the package passed. Obviously Paulson and company did not see the risks.
So the Bush Administration did indeed sign on the dotted line for raising the limits. Anybody can say anything, but it’s not until the signature hits the paper does it really matter.
March 6, 2008 at 4:51 PM #165504svelteParticipantI believe the White House was against the plan to raise the limits, but agreed to allow it to get the rest of the package passed. Obviously Paulson and company did not see the risks.
So the Bush Administration did indeed sign on the dotted line for raising the limits. Anybody can say anything, but it’s not until the signature hits the paper does it really matter.
March 6, 2008 at 4:51 PM #165501svelteParticipantI believe the White House was against the plan to raise the limits, but agreed to allow it to get the rest of the package passed. Obviously Paulson and company did not see the risks.
So the Bush Administration did indeed sign on the dotted line for raising the limits. Anybody can say anything, but it’s not until the signature hits the paper does it really matter.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.