- This topic has 185 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 28, 2008 at 2:15 PM #213011May 28, 2008 at 2:24 PM #212946nooneParticipant
This question shows up on this board about every 6 months or so, and so far CBad has the best answer I’ve seen π
“Being rich means your name is Richard and you want to shorten it without being a dick.” – CBad
May 28, 2008 at 2:24 PM #213022nooneParticipantThis question shows up on this board about every 6 months or so, and so far CBad has the best answer I’ve seen π
“Being rich means your name is Richard and you want to shorten it without being a dick.” – CBad
May 28, 2008 at 2:24 PM #213046nooneParticipantThis question shows up on this board about every 6 months or so, and so far CBad has the best answer I’ve seen π
“Being rich means your name is Richard and you want to shorten it without being a dick.” – CBad
May 28, 2008 at 2:24 PM #213074nooneParticipantThis question shows up on this board about every 6 months or so, and so far CBad has the best answer I’ve seen π
“Being rich means your name is Richard and you want to shorten it without being a dick.” – CBad
May 28, 2008 at 2:24 PM #213103nooneParticipantThis question shows up on this board about every 6 months or so, and so far CBad has the best answer I’ve seen π
“Being rich means your name is Richard and you want to shorten it without being a dick.” – CBad
May 28, 2008 at 2:32 PM #212956waiting hawkParticipantBeing a multi millionaire with 2 or more million liquid (less property) is rich in my book.
May 28, 2008 at 2:32 PM #213032waiting hawkParticipantBeing a multi millionaire with 2 or more million liquid (less property) is rich in my book.
May 28, 2008 at 2:32 PM #213057waiting hawkParticipantBeing a multi millionaire with 2 or more million liquid (less property) is rich in my book.
May 28, 2008 at 2:32 PM #213083waiting hawkParticipantBeing a multi millionaire with 2 or more million liquid (less property) is rich in my book.
May 28, 2008 at 2:32 PM #213113waiting hawkParticipantBeing a multi millionaire with 2 or more million liquid (less property) is rich in my book.
May 28, 2008 at 2:35 PM #212961NotCrankyParticipant“I think many people in this thread are defining “happiness”, while the original poster’s question was really about monetary wealth.”
My post might have influenced this view. I think I was talking about “rich” in the only way I believe it exists while thinking that people with various sized wallets and collections or stuff could have it.Actually I thought this is what the OP was asking? Darn bias.
If the OP’s question was “what do you think is a really big collection of money and stuff?” I would say “500 million bucks, mansions on both coasts and 13 fine cars of all vintages”.May 28, 2008 at 2:35 PM #213037NotCrankyParticipant“I think many people in this thread are defining “happiness”, while the original poster’s question was really about monetary wealth.”
My post might have influenced this view. I think I was talking about “rich” in the only way I believe it exists while thinking that people with various sized wallets and collections or stuff could have it.Actually I thought this is what the OP was asking? Darn bias.
If the OP’s question was “what do you think is a really big collection of money and stuff?” I would say “500 million bucks, mansions on both coasts and 13 fine cars of all vintages”.May 28, 2008 at 2:35 PM #213064NotCrankyParticipant“I think many people in this thread are defining “happiness”, while the original poster’s question was really about monetary wealth.”
My post might have influenced this view. I think I was talking about “rich” in the only way I believe it exists while thinking that people with various sized wallets and collections or stuff could have it.Actually I thought this is what the OP was asking? Darn bias.
If the OP’s question was “what do you think is a really big collection of money and stuff?” I would say “500 million bucks, mansions on both coasts and 13 fine cars of all vintages”.May 28, 2008 at 2:35 PM #213089NotCrankyParticipant“I think many people in this thread are defining “happiness”, while the original poster’s question was really about monetary wealth.”
My post might have influenced this view. I think I was talking about “rich” in the only way I believe it exists while thinking that people with various sized wallets and collections or stuff could have it.Actually I thought this is what the OP was asking? Darn bias.
If the OP’s question was “what do you think is a really big collection of money and stuff?” I would say “500 million bucks, mansions on both coasts and 13 fine cars of all vintages”. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.