- This topic has 185 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 6 months ago by
sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 28, 2008 at 11:25 AM #12873May 28, 2008 at 11:34 AM #212750
New_Renter
ParticipantAccording to the SEC, your rich if you have a $5M Net Worth (not including personal residence). At that level you are considered a “Qualified Purchaser” and can legally invest in Venture Capital funds.
May 28, 2008 at 11:34 AM #212828New_Renter
ParticipantAccording to the SEC, your rich if you have a $5M Net Worth (not including personal residence). At that level you are considered a “Qualified Purchaser” and can legally invest in Venture Capital funds.
May 28, 2008 at 11:34 AM #212854New_Renter
ParticipantAccording to the SEC, your rich if you have a $5M Net Worth (not including personal residence). At that level you are considered a “Qualified Purchaser” and can legally invest in Venture Capital funds.
May 28, 2008 at 11:34 AM #212877New_Renter
ParticipantAccording to the SEC, your rich if you have a $5M Net Worth (not including personal residence). At that level you are considered a “Qualified Purchaser” and can legally invest in Venture Capital funds.
May 28, 2008 at 11:34 AM #212906New_Renter
ParticipantAccording to the SEC, your rich if you have a $5M Net Worth (not including personal residence). At that level you are considered a “Qualified Purchaser” and can legally invest in Venture Capital funds.
May 28, 2008 at 11:39 AM #212760Anonymous
GuestAlex,I’ve heard “rich” defined as not having to work for your money but being in the position of your money working for you.
Sounds good to me.
May 28, 2008 at 11:39 AM #212838Anonymous
GuestAlex,I’ve heard “rich” defined as not having to work for your money but being in the position of your money working for you.
Sounds good to me.
May 28, 2008 at 11:39 AM #212864Anonymous
GuestAlex,I’ve heard “rich” defined as not having to work for your money but being in the position of your money working for you.
Sounds good to me.
May 28, 2008 at 11:39 AM #212887Anonymous
GuestAlex,I’ve heard “rich” defined as not having to work for your money but being in the position of your money working for you.
Sounds good to me.
May 28, 2008 at 11:39 AM #212916Anonymous
GuestAlex,I’ve heard “rich” defined as not having to work for your money but being in the position of your money working for you.
Sounds good to me.
May 28, 2008 at 11:40 AM #212765an
ParticipantPersonally, rich = financially independent = retirement. That doesn’t mean that they don’t work, it just mean they can quit anytime and still be able to live their current life style. It also means when your $ is working for you and not you’re working for your $. I think someone who have a monthly expensive of $2k, a modest job and $1M in the bank, which is more than enough for them to just live off the interest, is richer than someone who have $10k/month expense making $200k/year but not much in saving.
May 28, 2008 at 11:40 AM #212844an
ParticipantPersonally, rich = financially independent = retirement. That doesn’t mean that they don’t work, it just mean they can quit anytime and still be able to live their current life style. It also means when your $ is working for you and not you’re working for your $. I think someone who have a monthly expensive of $2k, a modest job and $1M in the bank, which is more than enough for them to just live off the interest, is richer than someone who have $10k/month expense making $200k/year but not much in saving.
May 28, 2008 at 11:40 AM #212869an
ParticipantPersonally, rich = financially independent = retirement. That doesn’t mean that they don’t work, it just mean they can quit anytime and still be able to live their current life style. It also means when your $ is working for you and not you’re working for your $. I think someone who have a monthly expensive of $2k, a modest job and $1M in the bank, which is more than enough for them to just live off the interest, is richer than someone who have $10k/month expense making $200k/year but not much in saving.
May 28, 2008 at 11:40 AM #212892an
ParticipantPersonally, rich = financially independent = retirement. That doesn’t mean that they don’t work, it just mean they can quit anytime and still be able to live their current life style. It also means when your $ is working for you and not you’re working for your $. I think someone who have a monthly expensive of $2k, a modest job and $1M in the bank, which is more than enough for them to just live off the interest, is richer than someone who have $10k/month expense making $200k/year but not much in saving.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
