What will the repeal of Prop 13 do to the market?

[poorgradstudent]

Nothing.

Gay and Lesbian couples already buy property together all the time (so do unmarried heterosexual couples).

I suppose long term there could be some minor inheritance issues, as gay marriage smooths out transfer of property if one partner passes away.

[faterikcartman]

WTF?

Obviously I missed something in the news. What happened/is happening regarding Prop 13?

[faterikcartman]

WTF?

Obviously I missed something in the news. What happened/is happening regarding Prop 13?

[faterikcartman]

WTF?

Obviously I missed something in the news. What happened/is happening regarding Prop 13?

[faterikcartman]

WTF?

Obviously I missed something in the news. What happened/is happening regarding Prop 13?

[faterikcartman]

WTF?

Obviously I missed something in the news. What happened/is happening regarding Prop 13?

[permabear]

[quote=poorgradstudent]Gay and Lesbian couples already buy property together all the time (so do unmarried heterosexual couples).[/quote]LOL am I missing something or are you mistaking Prop 13 for Prop 8?

[permabear]

[quote=poorgradstudent]Gay and Lesbian couples already buy property together all the time (so do unmarried heterosexual couples).[/quote]LOL am I missing something or are you mistaking Prop 13 for Prop 8?

[permabear]

[quote=poorgradstudent]Gay and Lesbian couples already buy property together all the time (so do unmarried heterosexual couples).[/quote]LOL am I missing something or are you mistaking Prop 13 for Prop 8?

[permabear]

[quote=poorgradstudent]Gay and Lesbian couples already buy property together all the time (so do unmarried heterosexual couples).[/quote]LOL am I missing something or are you mistaking Prop 13 for Prop 8?

[permabear]

[quote=poorgradstudent]Gay and Lesbian couples already buy property together all the time (so do unmarried heterosexual couples).[/quote]LOL am I missing something or are you mistaking Prop 13 for Prop 8?

[Eugene]

[quote=SD Realtor]I think that it is very telling that those in power view the solution to be increasing tax revenue rather then decreasing spending.

Lets all be honest here, do we really think that increasing tax revenues to the state will benefit in the long run? Sure the increased revenues will help reduce the current state budget woes but will it cure the disease? Didn’t we JUST have a state income tax increase?[/quote]

Didn’t we also cut spending across the board at least three years in a row?

There’s not much room to reduce spending even further, unless you want to compete with Texas for the largest percentage of poor people without health insurance (cut Medi-Cal), with Mississippi for the lowest K-12 spending per pupil and lowest school test scores (cut K-12), or to dismantle/cripple/cut loose the best public university system in the country (cut UC subsidies).

[Eugene]

[quote=SD Realtor]I think that it is very telling that those in power view the solution to be increasing tax revenue rather then decreasing spending.

Lets all be honest here, do we really think that increasing tax revenues to the state will benefit in the long run? Sure the increased revenues will help reduce the current state budget woes but will it cure the disease? Didn’t we JUST have a state income tax increase?[/quote]

Didn’t we also cut spending across the board at least three years in a row?

There’s not much room to reduce spending even further, unless you want to compete with Texas for the largest percentage of poor people without health insurance (cut Medi-Cal), with Mississippi for the lowest K-12 spending per pupil and lowest school test scores (cut K-12), or to dismantle/cripple/cut loose the best public university system in the country (cut UC subsidies).

[Eugene]

[quote=SD Realtor]I think that it is very telling that those in power view the solution to be increasing tax revenue rather then decreasing spending.

Lets all be honest here, do we really think that increasing tax revenues to the state will benefit in the long run? Sure the increased revenues will help reduce the current state budget woes but will it cure the disease? Didn’t we JUST have a state income tax increase?[/quote]

Didn’t we also cut spending across the board at least three years in a row?

There’s not much room to reduce spending even further, unless you want to compete with Texas for the largest percentage of poor people without health insurance (cut Medi-Cal), with Mississippi for the lowest K-12 spending per pupil and lowest school test scores (cut K-12), or to dismantle/cripple/cut loose the best public university system in the country (cut UC subsidies).

[Eugene]

[quote=SD Realtor]I think that it is very telling that those in power view the solution to be increasing tax revenue rather then decreasing spending.

Lets all be honest here, do we really think that increasing tax revenues to the state will benefit in the long run? Sure the increased revenues will help reduce the current state budget woes but will it cure the disease? Didn’t we JUST have a state income tax increase?[/quote]

Didn’t we also cut spending across the board at least three years in a row?

There’s not much room to reduce spending even further, unless you want to compete with Texas for the largest percentage of poor people without health insurance (cut Medi-Cal), with Mississippi for the lowest K-12 spending per pupil and lowest school test scores (cut K-12), or to dismantle/cripple/cut loose the best public university system in the country (cut UC subsidies).

[Author]

Posts