- This topic has 100 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by JWM in SD.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 1, 2008 at 12:12 PM #232004July 1, 2008 at 6:20 PM #232006RenParticipant
[quote=CA renter]…and according to Jim Klinge’s site, a number of them are being bought by investors.[/quote]
This is the line that realtors are now giving – every one that I’ve talked to this spring, in fact. I’m pretty sure they get a monthly newsletter from the NAR with useful propoganda, and the latest is that “investors have re-entered the market.” They never give a source for that.
The truth is, any yahoo with $50k could be called an “investor”, and those now re-entering the market are being too optimistic with their math. A $1,500 mortgage/tax payment with $1,800 rent might look good to an amateur, but does not necessarily equal positive cash flow. I know I wouldn’t be comfortable with it.
July 1, 2008 at 6:20 PM #232130RenParticipant[quote=CA renter]…and according to Jim Klinge’s site, a number of them are being bought by investors.[/quote]
This is the line that realtors are now giving – every one that I’ve talked to this spring, in fact. I’m pretty sure they get a monthly newsletter from the NAR with useful propoganda, and the latest is that “investors have re-entered the market.” They never give a source for that.
The truth is, any yahoo with $50k could be called an “investor”, and those now re-entering the market are being too optimistic with their math. A $1,500 mortgage/tax payment with $1,800 rent might look good to an amateur, but does not necessarily equal positive cash flow. I know I wouldn’t be comfortable with it.
July 1, 2008 at 6:20 PM #232139RenParticipant[quote=CA renter]…and according to Jim Klinge’s site, a number of them are being bought by investors.[/quote]
This is the line that realtors are now giving – every one that I’ve talked to this spring, in fact. I’m pretty sure they get a monthly newsletter from the NAR with useful propoganda, and the latest is that “investors have re-entered the market.” They never give a source for that.
The truth is, any yahoo with $50k could be called an “investor”, and those now re-entering the market are being too optimistic with their math. A $1,500 mortgage/tax payment with $1,800 rent might look good to an amateur, but does not necessarily equal positive cash flow. I know I wouldn’t be comfortable with it.
July 1, 2008 at 6:20 PM #232177RenParticipant[quote=CA renter]…and according to Jim Klinge’s site, a number of them are being bought by investors.[/quote]
This is the line that realtors are now giving – every one that I’ve talked to this spring, in fact. I’m pretty sure they get a monthly newsletter from the NAR with useful propoganda, and the latest is that “investors have re-entered the market.” They never give a source for that.
The truth is, any yahoo with $50k could be called an “investor”, and those now re-entering the market are being too optimistic with their math. A $1,500 mortgage/tax payment with $1,800 rent might look good to an amateur, but does not necessarily equal positive cash flow. I know I wouldn’t be comfortable with it.
July 1, 2008 at 6:20 PM #232190RenParticipant[quote=CA renter]…and according to Jim Klinge’s site, a number of them are being bought by investors.[/quote]
This is the line that realtors are now giving – every one that I’ve talked to this spring, in fact. I’m pretty sure they get a monthly newsletter from the NAR with useful propoganda, and the latest is that “investors have re-entered the market.” They never give a source for that.
The truth is, any yahoo with $50k could be called an “investor”, and those now re-entering the market are being too optimistic with their math. A $1,500 mortgage/tax payment with $1,800 rent might look good to an amateur, but does not necessarily equal positive cash flow. I know I wouldn’t be comfortable with it.
July 1, 2008 at 10:13 PM #232091AnonymousGuestProbably not a glitch as such. Probably re-defined the REO’s as something else temporarily, like when Countrywide pulled off some inventory for auction. (Of course they popped back on a few weeks later.)
July 1, 2008 at 10:13 PM #232213AnonymousGuestProbably not a glitch as such. Probably re-defined the REO’s as something else temporarily, like when Countrywide pulled off some inventory for auction. (Of course they popped back on a few weeks later.)
July 1, 2008 at 10:13 PM #232225AnonymousGuestProbably not a glitch as such. Probably re-defined the REO’s as something else temporarily, like when Countrywide pulled off some inventory for auction. (Of course they popped back on a few weeks later.)
July 1, 2008 at 10:13 PM #232264AnonymousGuestProbably not a glitch as such. Probably re-defined the REO’s as something else temporarily, like when Countrywide pulled off some inventory for auction. (Of course they popped back on a few weeks later.)
July 1, 2008 at 10:13 PM #232274AnonymousGuestProbably not a glitch as such. Probably re-defined the REO’s as something else temporarily, like when Countrywide pulled off some inventory for auction. (Of course they popped back on a few weeks later.)
July 2, 2008 at 9:26 AM #232206AnonymousGuestPerhaps you should be using Housing Tracker’s new stats. No such drop there.
http://www.housingtracker.net/askingprices/California/SanDiego-Carlsbad-SanMarcos/
July 2, 2008 at 9:26 AM #232328AnonymousGuestPerhaps you should be using Housing Tracker’s new stats. No such drop there.
http://www.housingtracker.net/askingprices/California/SanDiego-Carlsbad-SanMarcos/
July 2, 2008 at 9:26 AM #232340AnonymousGuestPerhaps you should be using Housing Tracker’s new stats. No such drop there.
http://www.housingtracker.net/askingprices/California/SanDiego-Carlsbad-SanMarcos/
July 2, 2008 at 9:26 AM #232379AnonymousGuestPerhaps you should be using Housing Tracker’s new stats. No such drop there.
http://www.housingtracker.net/askingprices/California/SanDiego-Carlsbad-SanMarcos/
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.