- This topic has 65 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by
Nor-LA-SD-guy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 12, 2010 at 9:00 AM #538351April 12, 2010 at 10:52 AM #539080
sdduuuude
ParticipantGood question. I always thought it meant you were poor if you calculated your net-worth based on the amount of land you owned or the value of your land.
April 12, 2010 at 10:52 AM #538985sdduuuude
ParticipantGood question. I always thought it meant you were poor if you calculated your net-worth based on the amount of land you owned or the value of your land.
April 12, 2010 at 10:52 AM #538517sdduuuude
ParticipantGood question. I always thought it meant you were poor if you calculated your net-worth based on the amount of land you owned or the value of your land.
April 12, 2010 at 10:52 AM #539347sdduuuude
ParticipantGood question. I always thought it meant you were poor if you calculated your net-worth based on the amount of land you owned or the value of your land.
April 12, 2010 at 10:52 AM #538396sdduuuude
ParticipantGood question. I always thought it meant you were poor if you calculated your net-worth based on the amount of land you owned or the value of your land.
April 12, 2010 at 10:59 AM #539085briansd1
GuestI love the “Landed Poor” description. The Victorian language is very appropriate. The industrial revolution of the time created the middle class and the suburban neighborhoods.
Everyone wants to live a baronial lifestyle in a manor surrounded by an estate (lawn) with his own horse and carriage (car).
So we have to work to maintain that lifestyle. A real Baron has other people working to maintain his lifestyle.
April 12, 2010 at 10:59 AM #538401briansd1
GuestI love the “Landed Poor” description. The Victorian language is very appropriate. The industrial revolution of the time created the middle class and the suburban neighborhoods.
Everyone wants to live a baronial lifestyle in a manor surrounded by an estate (lawn) with his own horse and carriage (car).
So we have to work to maintain that lifestyle. A real Baron has other people working to maintain his lifestyle.
April 12, 2010 at 10:59 AM #538990briansd1
GuestI love the “Landed Poor” description. The Victorian language is very appropriate. The industrial revolution of the time created the middle class and the suburban neighborhoods.
Everyone wants to live a baronial lifestyle in a manor surrounded by an estate (lawn) with his own horse and carriage (car).
So we have to work to maintain that lifestyle. A real Baron has other people working to maintain his lifestyle.
April 12, 2010 at 10:59 AM #538522briansd1
GuestI love the “Landed Poor” description. The Victorian language is very appropriate. The industrial revolution of the time created the middle class and the suburban neighborhoods.
Everyone wants to live a baronial lifestyle in a manor surrounded by an estate (lawn) with his own horse and carriage (car).
So we have to work to maintain that lifestyle. A real Baron has other people working to maintain his lifestyle.
April 12, 2010 at 10:59 AM #539352briansd1
GuestI love the “Landed Poor” description. The Victorian language is very appropriate. The industrial revolution of the time created the middle class and the suburban neighborhoods.
Everyone wants to live a baronial lifestyle in a manor surrounded by an estate (lawn) with his own horse and carriage (car).
So we have to work to maintain that lifestyle. A real Baron has other people working to maintain his lifestyle.
April 12, 2010 at 3:09 PM #539155svelte
ParticipantHere are excerpts from a 1983 article from Spokane, WA entitled “The Landed Poor: A New Class Emerges”
“‘It used to be we were seeing mainly people who were working, but had mismanaged their finances,’ says Breen. ‘Now it’s more a case of people simply not having enough money to pay. A lot of them are fairly average, middle-class people whose financial situation has taken a turn for the worse.’For example, Yvonne Kinney and Charles Vejvoda have only $649 left to pay on their $40,000 home but are six months behind in payments.
They have bills, mostly medical, totaling nearly $15,000. They are both unemployed and living on food stamps with their three children and Kinney’s mother.
Technically, they could sell their home, pay their bills and have money left. But then they’d have to rent at five to 10 times their current monthly payment of $69.”
The more that things change, the more they stay the same, eh?
April 12, 2010 at 3:09 PM #539422svelte
ParticipantHere are excerpts from a 1983 article from Spokane, WA entitled “The Landed Poor: A New Class Emerges”
“‘It used to be we were seeing mainly people who were working, but had mismanaged their finances,’ says Breen. ‘Now it’s more a case of people simply not having enough money to pay. A lot of them are fairly average, middle-class people whose financial situation has taken a turn for the worse.’For example, Yvonne Kinney and Charles Vejvoda have only $649 left to pay on their $40,000 home but are six months behind in payments.
They have bills, mostly medical, totaling nearly $15,000. They are both unemployed and living on food stamps with their three children and Kinney’s mother.
Technically, they could sell their home, pay their bills and have money left. But then they’d have to rent at five to 10 times their current monthly payment of $69.”
The more that things change, the more they stay the same, eh?
April 12, 2010 at 3:09 PM #538592svelte
ParticipantHere are excerpts from a 1983 article from Spokane, WA entitled “The Landed Poor: A New Class Emerges”
“‘It used to be we were seeing mainly people who were working, but had mismanaged their finances,’ says Breen. ‘Now it’s more a case of people simply not having enough money to pay. A lot of them are fairly average, middle-class people whose financial situation has taken a turn for the worse.’For example, Yvonne Kinney and Charles Vejvoda have only $649 left to pay on their $40,000 home but are six months behind in payments.
They have bills, mostly medical, totaling nearly $15,000. They are both unemployed and living on food stamps with their three children and Kinney’s mother.
Technically, they could sell their home, pay their bills and have money left. But then they’d have to rent at five to 10 times their current monthly payment of $69.”
The more that things change, the more they stay the same, eh?
April 12, 2010 at 3:09 PM #539059svelte
ParticipantHere are excerpts from a 1983 article from Spokane, WA entitled “The Landed Poor: A New Class Emerges”
“‘It used to be we were seeing mainly people who were working, but had mismanaged their finances,’ says Breen. ‘Now it’s more a case of people simply not having enough money to pay. A lot of them are fairly average, middle-class people whose financial situation has taken a turn for the worse.’For example, Yvonne Kinney and Charles Vejvoda have only $649 left to pay on their $40,000 home but are six months behind in payments.
They have bills, mostly medical, totaling nearly $15,000. They are both unemployed and living on food stamps with their three children and Kinney’s mother.
Technically, they could sell their home, pay their bills and have money left. But then they’d have to rent at five to 10 times their current monthly payment of $69.”
The more that things change, the more they stay the same, eh?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.