- This topic has 45 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by LarryTheRenter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 10, 2009 at 3:42 PM #16792December 10, 2009 at 4:12 PM #492747Diego MamaniParticipant
Look at how much people insure their houses for. What I have in mind is replacement value, in case of, say, fire.
For your example, you are looking at the higher end of the $600K-$1MM range. Of course, if you go for the really fancy materials, flooring, etc., the sky is the limit.
December 10, 2009 at 4:12 PM #493620Diego MamaniParticipantLook at how much people insure their houses for. What I have in mind is replacement value, in case of, say, fire.
For your example, you are looking at the higher end of the $600K-$1MM range. Of course, if you go for the really fancy materials, flooring, etc., the sky is the limit.
December 10, 2009 at 4:12 PM #493383Diego MamaniParticipantLook at how much people insure their houses for. What I have in mind is replacement value, in case of, say, fire.
For your example, you are looking at the higher end of the $600K-$1MM range. Of course, if you go for the really fancy materials, flooring, etc., the sky is the limit.
December 10, 2009 at 4:12 PM #493294Diego MamaniParticipantLook at how much people insure their houses for. What I have in mind is replacement value, in case of, say, fire.
For your example, you are looking at the higher end of the $600K-$1MM range. Of course, if you go for the really fancy materials, flooring, etc., the sky is the limit.
December 10, 2009 at 4:12 PM #492909Diego MamaniParticipantLook at how much people insure their houses for. What I have in mind is replacement value, in case of, say, fire.
For your example, you are looking at the higher end of the $600K-$1MM range. Of course, if you go for the really fancy materials, flooring, etc., the sky is the limit.
December 11, 2009 at 12:38 PM #493223beanmaestroParticipantThere’s definitely a huge dichotomy between the $50-90/sqft costs you cite and what actually gets charged for rebuilds. Apparently, after last year’s fires in Santa Barbara, rebuilding cost $300/sqft. And that was true even when folks were only insured to $200/sqft.
The mortgage broker we used (who claims to own several rental properties, and probably has good contacts in the industry) told us he paid about $300, so it doesn’t seem to just have been the chumps.
December 11, 2009 at 12:38 PM #493935beanmaestroParticipantThere’s definitely a huge dichotomy between the $50-90/sqft costs you cite and what actually gets charged for rebuilds. Apparently, after last year’s fires in Santa Barbara, rebuilding cost $300/sqft. And that was true even when folks were only insured to $200/sqft.
The mortgage broker we used (who claims to own several rental properties, and probably has good contacts in the industry) told us he paid about $300, so it doesn’t seem to just have been the chumps.
December 11, 2009 at 12:38 PM #493061beanmaestroParticipantThere’s definitely a huge dichotomy between the $50-90/sqft costs you cite and what actually gets charged for rebuilds. Apparently, after last year’s fires in Santa Barbara, rebuilding cost $300/sqft. And that was true even when folks were only insured to $200/sqft.
The mortgage broker we used (who claims to own several rental properties, and probably has good contacts in the industry) told us he paid about $300, so it doesn’t seem to just have been the chumps.
December 11, 2009 at 12:38 PM #493697beanmaestroParticipantThere’s definitely a huge dichotomy between the $50-90/sqft costs you cite and what actually gets charged for rebuilds. Apparently, after last year’s fires in Santa Barbara, rebuilding cost $300/sqft. And that was true even when folks were only insured to $200/sqft.
The mortgage broker we used (who claims to own several rental properties, and probably has good contacts in the industry) told us he paid about $300, so it doesn’t seem to just have been the chumps.
December 11, 2009 at 12:38 PM #493608beanmaestroParticipantThere’s definitely a huge dichotomy between the $50-90/sqft costs you cite and what actually gets charged for rebuilds. Apparently, after last year’s fires in Santa Barbara, rebuilding cost $300/sqft. And that was true even when folks were only insured to $200/sqft.
The mortgage broker we used (who claims to own several rental properties, and probably has good contacts in the industry) told us he paid about $300, so it doesn’t seem to just have been the chumps.
December 11, 2009 at 4:31 PM #493995kicksavedaveParticipantThere is also a huge spread between what the raw costs are for the subs to perform the specific building task – foundation, framing, roofing, electrical, plumbing etc, and what a GC will charge you as your “building cost”. I’ve heard GC’s fees range from 10 to 30% of the cost, but there are different methods for them to charge you – flat rate, cost plus, etc.
Using low end finishings – Vinyl floor not hardwood, laminate counters not granite, etc, I had a brand new house build in Colorado for $60/sq foot total. $298K total with 3450 sq ft finished and 1600 sq ft unfinished basement, and that included the land which was assessed at around $15K. So, subtracting $15K for the land and the builders profit, it probably cost under $50/sq ft to build this house. And we had a lot of floor plan customizations which added $30K to our final price… The same model sold for $275K with the same dimensions later on. 4950 total sq ft divided by $275K = $55/sq ft.
So it is possible to build a house for well under $100/ sqft, but that won’t include land. That’s the rub here in Cali, there are no lots for $15K.
December 11, 2009 at 4:31 PM #493282kicksavedaveParticipantThere is also a huge spread between what the raw costs are for the subs to perform the specific building task – foundation, framing, roofing, electrical, plumbing etc, and what a GC will charge you as your “building cost”. I’ve heard GC’s fees range from 10 to 30% of the cost, but there are different methods for them to charge you – flat rate, cost plus, etc.
Using low end finishings – Vinyl floor not hardwood, laminate counters not granite, etc, I had a brand new house build in Colorado for $60/sq foot total. $298K total with 3450 sq ft finished and 1600 sq ft unfinished basement, and that included the land which was assessed at around $15K. So, subtracting $15K for the land and the builders profit, it probably cost under $50/sq ft to build this house. And we had a lot of floor plan customizations which added $30K to our final price… The same model sold for $275K with the same dimensions later on. 4950 total sq ft divided by $275K = $55/sq ft.
So it is possible to build a house for well under $100/ sqft, but that won’t include land. That’s the rub here in Cali, there are no lots for $15K.
December 11, 2009 at 4:31 PM #493121kicksavedaveParticipantThere is also a huge spread between what the raw costs are for the subs to perform the specific building task – foundation, framing, roofing, electrical, plumbing etc, and what a GC will charge you as your “building cost”. I’ve heard GC’s fees range from 10 to 30% of the cost, but there are different methods for them to charge you – flat rate, cost plus, etc.
Using low end finishings – Vinyl floor not hardwood, laminate counters not granite, etc, I had a brand new house build in Colorado for $60/sq foot total. $298K total with 3450 sq ft finished and 1600 sq ft unfinished basement, and that included the land which was assessed at around $15K. So, subtracting $15K for the land and the builders profit, it probably cost under $50/sq ft to build this house. And we had a lot of floor plan customizations which added $30K to our final price… The same model sold for $275K with the same dimensions later on. 4950 total sq ft divided by $275K = $55/sq ft.
So it is possible to build a house for well under $100/ sqft, but that won’t include land. That’s the rub here in Cali, there are no lots for $15K.
December 11, 2009 at 4:31 PM #493756kicksavedaveParticipantThere is also a huge spread between what the raw costs are for the subs to perform the specific building task – foundation, framing, roofing, electrical, plumbing etc, and what a GC will charge you as your “building cost”. I’ve heard GC’s fees range from 10 to 30% of the cost, but there are different methods for them to charge you – flat rate, cost plus, etc.
Using low end finishings – Vinyl floor not hardwood, laminate counters not granite, etc, I had a brand new house build in Colorado for $60/sq foot total. $298K total with 3450 sq ft finished and 1600 sq ft unfinished basement, and that included the land which was assessed at around $15K. So, subtracting $15K for the land and the builders profit, it probably cost under $50/sq ft to build this house. And we had a lot of floor plan customizations which added $30K to our final price… The same model sold for $275K with the same dimensions later on. 4950 total sq ft divided by $275K = $55/sq ft.
So it is possible to build a house for well under $100/ sqft, but that won’t include land. That’s the rub here in Cali, there are no lots for $15K.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.