- This topic has 130 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by Jim Jones.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 3, 2008 at 4:57 AM #13502August 3, 2008 at 8:41 AM #251123bsrsharmaParticipant
Leaving CA
This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.
August 3, 2008 at 8:41 AM #251282bsrsharmaParticipantLeaving CA
This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.
August 3, 2008 at 8:41 AM #251290bsrsharmaParticipantLeaving CA
This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.
August 3, 2008 at 8:41 AM #251346bsrsharmaParticipantLeaving CA
This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.
August 3, 2008 at 8:41 AM #251354bsrsharmaParticipantLeaving CA
This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.
August 3, 2008 at 8:57 AM #251133EconProfParticipantMT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.August 3, 2008 at 8:57 AM #251292EconProfParticipantMT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.August 3, 2008 at 8:57 AM #251300EconProfParticipantMT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.August 3, 2008 at 8:57 AM #251356EconProfParticipantMT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.August 3, 2008 at 8:57 AM #251364EconProfParticipantMT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.August 3, 2008 at 9:39 AM #251173jficquetteParticipantI think no one wants to leave but feel they should so they gather strength from others who feel the same way.
John
August 3, 2008 at 9:39 AM #251332jficquetteParticipantI think no one wants to leave but feel they should so they gather strength from others who feel the same way.
John
August 3, 2008 at 9:39 AM #251340jficquetteParticipantI think no one wants to leave but feel they should so they gather strength from others who feel the same way.
John
August 3, 2008 at 9:39 AM #251398jficquetteParticipantI think no one wants to leave but feel they should so they gather strength from others who feel the same way.
John
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.