- This topic has 145 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 3, 2009 at 10:18 AM #410390June 3, 2009 at 10:56 AM #409733(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=FormerSanDiegan][quote=UCGal]Are you calling the bottom nationally? Regionally? San Diego? Specific neighborhoods?
Just curious.[/quote]
Due to the quantum nature of the phenomena I am measuring and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
I can either hit the time precisely or the location, but not both. Other have concentrated on specific areas, so I am focusing my energy on the specific time.[/quote]FSD: Did you factor in Planck’s Constant? And where is Schrodinger’s cat?
[/quote]I’m still trying to figure out if Schrodinger’s cat was dead or alive when it bounced. For now, I am assuming both.
June 3, 2009 at 10:56 AM #409971(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=FormerSanDiegan][quote=UCGal]Are you calling the bottom nationally? Regionally? San Diego? Specific neighborhoods?
Just curious.[/quote]
Due to the quantum nature of the phenomena I am measuring and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
I can either hit the time precisely or the location, but not both. Other have concentrated on specific areas, so I am focusing my energy on the specific time.[/quote]FSD: Did you factor in Planck’s Constant? And where is Schrodinger’s cat?
[/quote]I’m still trying to figure out if Schrodinger’s cat was dead or alive when it bounced. For now, I am assuming both.
June 3, 2009 at 10:56 AM #410218(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=FormerSanDiegan][quote=UCGal]Are you calling the bottom nationally? Regionally? San Diego? Specific neighborhoods?
Just curious.[/quote]
Due to the quantum nature of the phenomena I am measuring and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
I can either hit the time precisely or the location, but not both. Other have concentrated on specific areas, so I am focusing my energy on the specific time.[/quote]FSD: Did you factor in Planck’s Constant? And where is Schrodinger’s cat?
[/quote]I’m still trying to figure out if Schrodinger’s cat was dead or alive when it bounced. For now, I am assuming both.
June 3, 2009 at 10:56 AM #410281(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=FormerSanDiegan][quote=UCGal]Are you calling the bottom nationally? Regionally? San Diego? Specific neighborhoods?
Just curious.[/quote]
Due to the quantum nature of the phenomena I am measuring and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
I can either hit the time precisely or the location, but not both. Other have concentrated on specific areas, so I am focusing my energy on the specific time.[/quote]FSD: Did you factor in Planck’s Constant? And where is Schrodinger’s cat?
[/quote]I’m still trying to figure out if Schrodinger’s cat was dead or alive when it bounced. For now, I am assuming both.
June 3, 2009 at 10:56 AM #410432(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=FormerSanDiegan][quote=UCGal]Are you calling the bottom nationally? Regionally? San Diego? Specific neighborhoods?
Just curious.[/quote]
Due to the quantum nature of the phenomena I am measuring and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
I can either hit the time precisely or the location, but not both. Other have concentrated on specific areas, so I am focusing my energy on the specific time.[/quote]FSD: Did you factor in Planck’s Constant? And where is Schrodinger’s cat?
[/quote]I’m still trying to figure out if Schrodinger’s cat was dead or alive when it bounced. For now, I am assuming both.
June 6, 2009 at 12:11 PM #411434rocket scienceParticipantHey, FSD may be right.
Houses are now undervalued.
It says so right here.Southern California property values sink below historic norms
June 6, 2009 at 12:11 PM #411672rocket scienceParticipantHey, FSD may be right.
Houses are now undervalued.
It says so right here.Southern California property values sink below historic norms
June 6, 2009 at 12:11 PM #411918rocket scienceParticipantHey, FSD may be right.
Houses are now undervalued.
It says so right here.Southern California property values sink below historic norms
June 6, 2009 at 12:11 PM #411985rocket scienceParticipantHey, FSD may be right.
Houses are now undervalued.
It says so right here.Southern California property values sink below historic norms
June 6, 2009 at 12:11 PM #412135rocket scienceParticipantHey, FSD may be right.
Houses are now undervalued.
It says so right here.Southern California property values sink below historic norms
June 6, 2009 at 12:33 PM #4114394plexownerParticipantrocket science – the article has already been thoroughly discredited in this thread
http://piggington.com/apparently_sd_is_undervalued_right_now_by_alot
June 6, 2009 at 12:33 PM #4116774plexownerParticipantrocket science – the article has already been thoroughly discredited in this thread
http://piggington.com/apparently_sd_is_undervalued_right_now_by_alot
June 6, 2009 at 12:33 PM #4119234plexownerParticipantrocket science – the article has already been thoroughly discredited in this thread
http://piggington.com/apparently_sd_is_undervalued_right_now_by_alot
June 6, 2009 at 12:33 PM #4119904plexownerParticipantrocket science – the article has already been thoroughly discredited in this thread
http://piggington.com/apparently_sd_is_undervalued_right_now_by_alot
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.