- This topic has 105 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 21, 2008 at 10:51 AM #291077October 21, 2008 at 12:46 PM #290784crParticipant
50% of sales in California were foreclosures. This was on CR, from the LA Times Land Blog:
“A total of 20,497 new and resale houses and condos closed escrow in the six-county Southland in September, up 5.8 percent from 19,366 in August and up 64.6 percent from 12,455 in September 2007, according to San Diego-based MDA DataQuick, a real estate information service.
Fifty percent of all existing homes that closed escrow in September had been foreclosed on at some point in the prior year. That’s up from 45.5 percent in August and 12.6 percent in September last year.”
I almost posted this yesterday, thinking the bottom callers would come out. They seem fewer and it took longer than normal this time. that tells me we’re sitll not quite there.
Take away the foreclosures and sales are down from last year. What I’m wondering is if the number of foreclosure sales includes bank repos, though it would probably say that. Anyone know?
October 21, 2008 at 12:46 PM #291097crParticipant50% of sales in California were foreclosures. This was on CR, from the LA Times Land Blog:
“A total of 20,497 new and resale houses and condos closed escrow in the six-county Southland in September, up 5.8 percent from 19,366 in August and up 64.6 percent from 12,455 in September 2007, according to San Diego-based MDA DataQuick, a real estate information service.
Fifty percent of all existing homes that closed escrow in September had been foreclosed on at some point in the prior year. That’s up from 45.5 percent in August and 12.6 percent in September last year.”
I almost posted this yesterday, thinking the bottom callers would come out. They seem fewer and it took longer than normal this time. that tells me we’re sitll not quite there.
Take away the foreclosures and sales are down from last year. What I’m wondering is if the number of foreclosure sales includes bank repos, though it would probably say that. Anyone know?
October 21, 2008 at 12:46 PM #291100crParticipant50% of sales in California were foreclosures. This was on CR, from the LA Times Land Blog:
“A total of 20,497 new and resale houses and condos closed escrow in the six-county Southland in September, up 5.8 percent from 19,366 in August and up 64.6 percent from 12,455 in September 2007, according to San Diego-based MDA DataQuick, a real estate information service.
Fifty percent of all existing homes that closed escrow in September had been foreclosed on at some point in the prior year. That’s up from 45.5 percent in August and 12.6 percent in September last year.”
I almost posted this yesterday, thinking the bottom callers would come out. They seem fewer and it took longer than normal this time. that tells me we’re sitll not quite there.
Take away the foreclosures and sales are down from last year. What I’m wondering is if the number of foreclosure sales includes bank repos, though it would probably say that. Anyone know?
October 21, 2008 at 12:46 PM #291135crParticipant50% of sales in California were foreclosures. This was on CR, from the LA Times Land Blog:
“A total of 20,497 new and resale houses and condos closed escrow in the six-county Southland in September, up 5.8 percent from 19,366 in August and up 64.6 percent from 12,455 in September 2007, according to San Diego-based MDA DataQuick, a real estate information service.
Fifty percent of all existing homes that closed escrow in September had been foreclosed on at some point in the prior year. That’s up from 45.5 percent in August and 12.6 percent in September last year.”
I almost posted this yesterday, thinking the bottom callers would come out. They seem fewer and it took longer than normal this time. that tells me we’re sitll not quite there.
Take away the foreclosures and sales are down from last year. What I’m wondering is if the number of foreclosure sales includes bank repos, though it would probably say that. Anyone know?
October 21, 2008 at 12:46 PM #291138crParticipant50% of sales in California were foreclosures. This was on CR, from the LA Times Land Blog:
“A total of 20,497 new and resale houses and condos closed escrow in the six-county Southland in September, up 5.8 percent from 19,366 in August and up 64.6 percent from 12,455 in September 2007, according to San Diego-based MDA DataQuick, a real estate information service.
Fifty percent of all existing homes that closed escrow in September had been foreclosed on at some point in the prior year. That’s up from 45.5 percent in August and 12.6 percent in September last year.”
I almost posted this yesterday, thinking the bottom callers would come out. They seem fewer and it took longer than normal this time. that tells me we’re sitll not quite there.
Take away the foreclosures and sales are down from last year. What I’m wondering is if the number of foreclosure sales includes bank repos, though it would probably say that. Anyone know?
October 21, 2008 at 12:48 PM #290788DWCAPParticipantIt is simple supply and demand. We have more demand at a lower price. That doesnt mean that price is starting to appreciate, only that we will have to crash through multiple demand levels on our way down. I think most people care about price bottoms, not sales levels (though the two are connected). So we hit a sales bottom, doesnt mean we will start seeing appreciation, which is the natural conclusion if you are telling everyone to go out and buy now. We all saw the demand levels back in September 07, and things economically have only gotten worse since then. There is no support for price appreciation right now, not when the only thing driving the increased sales is falling prices.
Take an example in the stock market. RE moves alot slower than stocks, but we can have plenty of days when stocks are crashing and the sales numbers are way way up. Does that mean it is a good time to buy? Maybe, maybe not. You need more info than that.October 21, 2008 at 12:48 PM #291102DWCAPParticipantIt is simple supply and demand. We have more demand at a lower price. That doesnt mean that price is starting to appreciate, only that we will have to crash through multiple demand levels on our way down. I think most people care about price bottoms, not sales levels (though the two are connected). So we hit a sales bottom, doesnt mean we will start seeing appreciation, which is the natural conclusion if you are telling everyone to go out and buy now. We all saw the demand levels back in September 07, and things economically have only gotten worse since then. There is no support for price appreciation right now, not when the only thing driving the increased sales is falling prices.
Take an example in the stock market. RE moves alot slower than stocks, but we can have plenty of days when stocks are crashing and the sales numbers are way way up. Does that mean it is a good time to buy? Maybe, maybe not. You need more info than that.October 21, 2008 at 12:48 PM #291105DWCAPParticipantIt is simple supply and demand. We have more demand at a lower price. That doesnt mean that price is starting to appreciate, only that we will have to crash through multiple demand levels on our way down. I think most people care about price bottoms, not sales levels (though the two are connected). So we hit a sales bottom, doesnt mean we will start seeing appreciation, which is the natural conclusion if you are telling everyone to go out and buy now. We all saw the demand levels back in September 07, and things economically have only gotten worse since then. There is no support for price appreciation right now, not when the only thing driving the increased sales is falling prices.
Take an example in the stock market. RE moves alot slower than stocks, but we can have plenty of days when stocks are crashing and the sales numbers are way way up. Does that mean it is a good time to buy? Maybe, maybe not. You need more info than that.October 21, 2008 at 12:48 PM #291140DWCAPParticipantIt is simple supply and demand. We have more demand at a lower price. That doesnt mean that price is starting to appreciate, only that we will have to crash through multiple demand levels on our way down. I think most people care about price bottoms, not sales levels (though the two are connected). So we hit a sales bottom, doesnt mean we will start seeing appreciation, which is the natural conclusion if you are telling everyone to go out and buy now. We all saw the demand levels back in September 07, and things economically have only gotten worse since then. There is no support for price appreciation right now, not when the only thing driving the increased sales is falling prices.
Take an example in the stock market. RE moves alot slower than stocks, but we can have plenty of days when stocks are crashing and the sales numbers are way way up. Does that mean it is a good time to buy? Maybe, maybe not. You need more info than that.October 21, 2008 at 12:48 PM #291143DWCAPParticipantIt is simple supply and demand. We have more demand at a lower price. That doesnt mean that price is starting to appreciate, only that we will have to crash through multiple demand levels on our way down. I think most people care about price bottoms, not sales levels (though the two are connected). So we hit a sales bottom, doesnt mean we will start seeing appreciation, which is the natural conclusion if you are telling everyone to go out and buy now. We all saw the demand levels back in September 07, and things economically have only gotten worse since then. There is no support for price appreciation right now, not when the only thing driving the increased sales is falling prices.
Take an example in the stock market. RE moves alot slower than stocks, but we can have plenty of days when stocks are crashing and the sales numbers are way way up. Does that mean it is a good time to buy? Maybe, maybe not. You need more info than that.October 21, 2008 at 1:50 PM #29081834f3f3fParticipantI think that statement is ignorance, inside denial wrapped in a dream. Either that or he’s a protagonist with a job interview for the devil’s advocate.
October 21, 2008 at 1:50 PM #29113134f3f3fParticipantI think that statement is ignorance, inside denial wrapped in a dream. Either that or he’s a protagonist with a job interview for the devil’s advocate.
October 21, 2008 at 1:50 PM #29113434f3f3fParticipantI think that statement is ignorance, inside denial wrapped in a dream. Either that or he’s a protagonist with a job interview for the devil’s advocate.
October 21, 2008 at 1:50 PM #29117034f3f3fParticipantI think that statement is ignorance, inside denial wrapped in a dream. Either that or he’s a protagonist with a job interview for the devil’s advocate.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.