- This topic has 715 replies, 42 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by ra633.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 18, 2009 at 5:08 PM #349851February 18, 2009 at 5:23 PM #349284(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant
Nice smoker analogy. It points out that the mortgage arena is not the only place where we subsidize stupidity (or bad judgment).
But, since you can comfortably afford the payment, I think it may be short-sighted to try to get a loan mod now, depending on the restrictions they might place. Why get a small chunk now, when you can get a larger concession in the future. It also will restrict your use of the property (e.g. you may not be able to rent it out if you want). I would wait another 12 months to see how far underwater you might ultimately be, then make a decision. Your best course might be to refinance or take a mod under Obama’s new program if it comes to fruition.
If I were you I wouldn’t walk now or take any loan mods until I can smell the bottom. Once you see how low things get you’ll get your best deal on a loan mod, refi, or whatever.
You should treat this exactly the same way as those who are renting with a comfortable monthly payment waiting for bottom before taking action and taking advantage of the market.
February 18, 2009 at 5:23 PM #349603(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantNice smoker analogy. It points out that the mortgage arena is not the only place where we subsidize stupidity (or bad judgment).
But, since you can comfortably afford the payment, I think it may be short-sighted to try to get a loan mod now, depending on the restrictions they might place. Why get a small chunk now, when you can get a larger concession in the future. It also will restrict your use of the property (e.g. you may not be able to rent it out if you want). I would wait another 12 months to see how far underwater you might ultimately be, then make a decision. Your best course might be to refinance or take a mod under Obama’s new program if it comes to fruition.
If I were you I wouldn’t walk now or take any loan mods until I can smell the bottom. Once you see how low things get you’ll get your best deal on a loan mod, refi, or whatever.
You should treat this exactly the same way as those who are renting with a comfortable monthly payment waiting for bottom before taking action and taking advantage of the market.
February 18, 2009 at 5:23 PM #349725(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantNice smoker analogy. It points out that the mortgage arena is not the only place where we subsidize stupidity (or bad judgment).
But, since you can comfortably afford the payment, I think it may be short-sighted to try to get a loan mod now, depending on the restrictions they might place. Why get a small chunk now, when you can get a larger concession in the future. It also will restrict your use of the property (e.g. you may not be able to rent it out if you want). I would wait another 12 months to see how far underwater you might ultimately be, then make a decision. Your best course might be to refinance or take a mod under Obama’s new program if it comes to fruition.
If I were you I wouldn’t walk now or take any loan mods until I can smell the bottom. Once you see how low things get you’ll get your best deal on a loan mod, refi, or whatever.
You should treat this exactly the same way as those who are renting with a comfortable monthly payment waiting for bottom before taking action and taking advantage of the market.
February 18, 2009 at 5:23 PM #349758(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantNice smoker analogy. It points out that the mortgage arena is not the only place where we subsidize stupidity (or bad judgment).
But, since you can comfortably afford the payment, I think it may be short-sighted to try to get a loan mod now, depending on the restrictions they might place. Why get a small chunk now, when you can get a larger concession in the future. It also will restrict your use of the property (e.g. you may not be able to rent it out if you want). I would wait another 12 months to see how far underwater you might ultimately be, then make a decision. Your best course might be to refinance or take a mod under Obama’s new program if it comes to fruition.
If I were you I wouldn’t walk now or take any loan mods until I can smell the bottom. Once you see how low things get you’ll get your best deal on a loan mod, refi, or whatever.
You should treat this exactly the same way as those who are renting with a comfortable monthly payment waiting for bottom before taking action and taking advantage of the market.
February 18, 2009 at 5:23 PM #349856(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantNice smoker analogy. It points out that the mortgage arena is not the only place where we subsidize stupidity (or bad judgment).
But, since you can comfortably afford the payment, I think it may be short-sighted to try to get a loan mod now, depending on the restrictions they might place. Why get a small chunk now, when you can get a larger concession in the future. It also will restrict your use of the property (e.g. you may not be able to rent it out if you want). I would wait another 12 months to see how far underwater you might ultimately be, then make a decision. Your best course might be to refinance or take a mod under Obama’s new program if it comes to fruition.
If I were you I wouldn’t walk now or take any loan mods until I can smell the bottom. Once you see how low things get you’ll get your best deal on a loan mod, refi, or whatever.
You should treat this exactly the same way as those who are renting with a comfortable monthly payment waiting for bottom before taking action and taking advantage of the market.
February 18, 2009 at 5:59 PM #349314ibjamesParticipantYeah, you mentioned earlier when you said you talked to people.. family, friends, realtors.. all thought that housing “couldn’t get any lower!” Everyone told you to consider the sources yet you bought anyway.. on the premis that you LOVED the house, and etc. etc. Now it’s a pile of garbage eh?
“Submitted by 23109VC on April 21, 2007 – 1:21pm.
it’s not a condo. they are SFR’s, detached. I checked the property records, tax assessor records etc. NOT a condo.
I know what you mean about some places that “look” like houses but aren’t. lennar built a development a few miles from harveston up Winchester called Griffith park, or Griffith Place..somethingl ike that. i thikn they call them “courtyard homes”. each structure is freestanding…no shared walls..but they are ON the property lines, and they share driveways….”guest parking” spaces, like a condo. they look/feel like condos in size and the “crammed” in feel..but yet they are “free standing”. they are condos.
Sausalito in Harveston are houses. you own the house and the lot. albeit the lots are on the small side, you still own it.
Despite a lot of you who are telling me NOT to do it, we are leaning toward buying. $350k for a 1900 sq ft house that is loaded with upgrades, in a nice community, in a good part of temecula, with a good location w/in harveston… no hassle of moving, (while my wife is pregnant), we can still get 100% financing, and the sller wil pay ALL our closing costs…
i don’t see these homes hitting high 200s. i think the worst it will get is 300-325k. i could be totally wrong..but if i’m right, and that’s the worst it gets, i’m not really doin that badly.
we have actually thought of bying it for 350k and then immediately listing it for sale at 440k…. and maybe being able to flip it to some sucker. π if we can’t sell it, we’ll happily stay.
”It wasn’t a lot of people, it was everyone.. eh.. get it adjusted.. or foreclose, your credit, justify it as I’m sure you will, another reason 20% down has to be the norm., then this decision won’t be so easy
February 18, 2009 at 5:59 PM #349633ibjamesParticipantYeah, you mentioned earlier when you said you talked to people.. family, friends, realtors.. all thought that housing “couldn’t get any lower!” Everyone told you to consider the sources yet you bought anyway.. on the premis that you LOVED the house, and etc. etc. Now it’s a pile of garbage eh?
“Submitted by 23109VC on April 21, 2007 – 1:21pm.
it’s not a condo. they are SFR’s, detached. I checked the property records, tax assessor records etc. NOT a condo.
I know what you mean about some places that “look” like houses but aren’t. lennar built a development a few miles from harveston up Winchester called Griffith park, or Griffith Place..somethingl ike that. i thikn they call them “courtyard homes”. each structure is freestanding…no shared walls..but they are ON the property lines, and they share driveways….”guest parking” spaces, like a condo. they look/feel like condos in size and the “crammed” in feel..but yet they are “free standing”. they are condos.
Sausalito in Harveston are houses. you own the house and the lot. albeit the lots are on the small side, you still own it.
Despite a lot of you who are telling me NOT to do it, we are leaning toward buying. $350k for a 1900 sq ft house that is loaded with upgrades, in a nice community, in a good part of temecula, with a good location w/in harveston… no hassle of moving, (while my wife is pregnant), we can still get 100% financing, and the sller wil pay ALL our closing costs…
i don’t see these homes hitting high 200s. i think the worst it will get is 300-325k. i could be totally wrong..but if i’m right, and that’s the worst it gets, i’m not really doin that badly.
we have actually thought of bying it for 350k and then immediately listing it for sale at 440k…. and maybe being able to flip it to some sucker. π if we can’t sell it, we’ll happily stay.
”It wasn’t a lot of people, it was everyone.. eh.. get it adjusted.. or foreclose, your credit, justify it as I’m sure you will, another reason 20% down has to be the norm., then this decision won’t be so easy
February 18, 2009 at 5:59 PM #349755ibjamesParticipantYeah, you mentioned earlier when you said you talked to people.. family, friends, realtors.. all thought that housing “couldn’t get any lower!” Everyone told you to consider the sources yet you bought anyway.. on the premis that you LOVED the house, and etc. etc. Now it’s a pile of garbage eh?
“Submitted by 23109VC on April 21, 2007 – 1:21pm.
it’s not a condo. they are SFR’s, detached. I checked the property records, tax assessor records etc. NOT a condo.
I know what you mean about some places that “look” like houses but aren’t. lennar built a development a few miles from harveston up Winchester called Griffith park, or Griffith Place..somethingl ike that. i thikn they call them “courtyard homes”. each structure is freestanding…no shared walls..but they are ON the property lines, and they share driveways….”guest parking” spaces, like a condo. they look/feel like condos in size and the “crammed” in feel..but yet they are “free standing”. they are condos.
Sausalito in Harveston are houses. you own the house and the lot. albeit the lots are on the small side, you still own it.
Despite a lot of you who are telling me NOT to do it, we are leaning toward buying. $350k for a 1900 sq ft house that is loaded with upgrades, in a nice community, in a good part of temecula, with a good location w/in harveston… no hassle of moving, (while my wife is pregnant), we can still get 100% financing, and the sller wil pay ALL our closing costs…
i don’t see these homes hitting high 200s. i think the worst it will get is 300-325k. i could be totally wrong..but if i’m right, and that’s the worst it gets, i’m not really doin that badly.
we have actually thought of bying it for 350k and then immediately listing it for sale at 440k…. and maybe being able to flip it to some sucker. π if we can’t sell it, we’ll happily stay.
”It wasn’t a lot of people, it was everyone.. eh.. get it adjusted.. or foreclose, your credit, justify it as I’m sure you will, another reason 20% down has to be the norm., then this decision won’t be so easy
February 18, 2009 at 5:59 PM #349788ibjamesParticipantYeah, you mentioned earlier when you said you talked to people.. family, friends, realtors.. all thought that housing “couldn’t get any lower!” Everyone told you to consider the sources yet you bought anyway.. on the premis that you LOVED the house, and etc. etc. Now it’s a pile of garbage eh?
“Submitted by 23109VC on April 21, 2007 – 1:21pm.
it’s not a condo. they are SFR’s, detached. I checked the property records, tax assessor records etc. NOT a condo.
I know what you mean about some places that “look” like houses but aren’t. lennar built a development a few miles from harveston up Winchester called Griffith park, or Griffith Place..somethingl ike that. i thikn they call them “courtyard homes”. each structure is freestanding…no shared walls..but they are ON the property lines, and they share driveways….”guest parking” spaces, like a condo. they look/feel like condos in size and the “crammed” in feel..but yet they are “free standing”. they are condos.
Sausalito in Harveston are houses. you own the house and the lot. albeit the lots are on the small side, you still own it.
Despite a lot of you who are telling me NOT to do it, we are leaning toward buying. $350k for a 1900 sq ft house that is loaded with upgrades, in a nice community, in a good part of temecula, with a good location w/in harveston… no hassle of moving, (while my wife is pregnant), we can still get 100% financing, and the sller wil pay ALL our closing costs…
i don’t see these homes hitting high 200s. i think the worst it will get is 300-325k. i could be totally wrong..but if i’m right, and that’s the worst it gets, i’m not really doin that badly.
we have actually thought of bying it for 350k and then immediately listing it for sale at 440k…. and maybe being able to flip it to some sucker. π if we can’t sell it, we’ll happily stay.
”It wasn’t a lot of people, it was everyone.. eh.. get it adjusted.. or foreclose, your credit, justify it as I’m sure you will, another reason 20% down has to be the norm., then this decision won’t be so easy
February 18, 2009 at 5:59 PM #349886ibjamesParticipantYeah, you mentioned earlier when you said you talked to people.. family, friends, realtors.. all thought that housing “couldn’t get any lower!” Everyone told you to consider the sources yet you bought anyway.. on the premis that you LOVED the house, and etc. etc. Now it’s a pile of garbage eh?
“Submitted by 23109VC on April 21, 2007 – 1:21pm.
it’s not a condo. they are SFR’s, detached. I checked the property records, tax assessor records etc. NOT a condo.
I know what you mean about some places that “look” like houses but aren’t. lennar built a development a few miles from harveston up Winchester called Griffith park, or Griffith Place..somethingl ike that. i thikn they call them “courtyard homes”. each structure is freestanding…no shared walls..but they are ON the property lines, and they share driveways….”guest parking” spaces, like a condo. they look/feel like condos in size and the “crammed” in feel..but yet they are “free standing”. they are condos.
Sausalito in Harveston are houses. you own the house and the lot. albeit the lots are on the small side, you still own it.
Despite a lot of you who are telling me NOT to do it, we are leaning toward buying. $350k for a 1900 sq ft house that is loaded with upgrades, in a nice community, in a good part of temecula, with a good location w/in harveston… no hassle of moving, (while my wife is pregnant), we can still get 100% financing, and the sller wil pay ALL our closing costs…
i don’t see these homes hitting high 200s. i think the worst it will get is 300-325k. i could be totally wrong..but if i’m right, and that’s the worst it gets, i’m not really doin that badly.
we have actually thought of bying it for 350k and then immediately listing it for sale at 440k…. and maybe being able to flip it to some sucker. π if we can’t sell it, we’ll happily stay.
”It wasn’t a lot of people, it was everyone.. eh.. get it adjusted.. or foreclose, your credit, justify it as I’m sure you will, another reason 20% down has to be the norm., then this decision won’t be so easy
February 18, 2009 at 6:56 PM #349354patientrenterParticipant[quote=23109VC]
I just spent a few more minutes reading all the posts here. I must say I am suprised at how hostile you all are towards me.
[/quote]23109VC, the reason many readers here are unhappy with people who bought near the peak with little money down (less than 50%, let’s say) and are now walking or getting bailed out is that
a) the other readers are getting the bill for the loss in the home’s value, (I am assuming the readers are mostly responsible taxpayers), and
b) if home prices had continued to go up, the homeowners would have got to keep the gain in price.
Tails, you win; heads, I lose. Do you see the unfairness issue?
February 18, 2009 at 6:56 PM #349673patientrenterParticipant[quote=23109VC]
I just spent a few more minutes reading all the posts here. I must say I am suprised at how hostile you all are towards me.
[/quote]23109VC, the reason many readers here are unhappy with people who bought near the peak with little money down (less than 50%, let’s say) and are now walking or getting bailed out is that
a) the other readers are getting the bill for the loss in the home’s value, (I am assuming the readers are mostly responsible taxpayers), and
b) if home prices had continued to go up, the homeowners would have got to keep the gain in price.
Tails, you win; heads, I lose. Do you see the unfairness issue?
February 18, 2009 at 6:56 PM #349795patientrenterParticipant[quote=23109VC]
I just spent a few more minutes reading all the posts here. I must say I am suprised at how hostile you all are towards me.
[/quote]23109VC, the reason many readers here are unhappy with people who bought near the peak with little money down (less than 50%, let’s say) and are now walking or getting bailed out is that
a) the other readers are getting the bill for the loss in the home’s value, (I am assuming the readers are mostly responsible taxpayers), and
b) if home prices had continued to go up, the homeowners would have got to keep the gain in price.
Tails, you win; heads, I lose. Do you see the unfairness issue?
February 18, 2009 at 6:56 PM #349829patientrenterParticipant[quote=23109VC]
I just spent a few more minutes reading all the posts here. I must say I am suprised at how hostile you all are towards me.
[/quote]23109VC, the reason many readers here are unhappy with people who bought near the peak with little money down (less than 50%, let’s say) and are now walking or getting bailed out is that
a) the other readers are getting the bill for the loss in the home’s value, (I am assuming the readers are mostly responsible taxpayers), and
b) if home prices had continued to go up, the homeowners would have got to keep the gain in price.
Tails, you win; heads, I lose. Do you see the unfairness issue?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.