Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Trying to understand inflation
- This topic has 55 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by peterb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 24, 2009 at 7:48 AM #460958September 24, 2009 at 8:55 AM #461193Rich ToscanoKeymaster
Actually sdduuuude I think that Mish’s chart is completely compatible with the arguments made in my two articles you linked to. His is a chart of REAL GDP, adjusted for changes to the purchasing power of the currency. I am on board with the idea that our real GDP growth over the next decade or whatever will be weak. Nominal GDP in comparison with Japan is a different story due to our vastly different monetary policy and the fact that our debt is not financed internally as it is in Japan.
Rich
September 24, 2009 at 8:55 AM #461809Rich ToscanoKeymasterActually sdduuuude I think that Mish’s chart is completely compatible with the arguments made in my two articles you linked to. His is a chart of REAL GDP, adjusted for changes to the purchasing power of the currency. I am on board with the idea that our real GDP growth over the next decade or whatever will be weak. Nominal GDP in comparison with Japan is a different story due to our vastly different monetary policy and the fact that our debt is not financed internally as it is in Japan.
Rich
September 24, 2009 at 8:55 AM #461532Rich ToscanoKeymasterActually sdduuuude I think that Mish’s chart is completely compatible with the arguments made in my two articles you linked to. His is a chart of REAL GDP, adjusted for changes to the purchasing power of the currency. I am on board with the idea that our real GDP growth over the next decade or whatever will be weak. Nominal GDP in comparison with Japan is a different story due to our vastly different monetary policy and the fact that our debt is not financed internally as it is in Japan.
Rich
September 24, 2009 at 8:55 AM #460998Rich ToscanoKeymasterActually sdduuuude I think that Mish’s chart is completely compatible with the arguments made in my two articles you linked to. His is a chart of REAL GDP, adjusted for changes to the purchasing power of the currency. I am on board with the idea that our real GDP growth over the next decade or whatever will be weak. Nominal GDP in comparison with Japan is a different story due to our vastly different monetary policy and the fact that our debt is not financed internally as it is in Japan.
Rich
September 24, 2009 at 8:55 AM #461605Rich ToscanoKeymasterActually sdduuuude I think that Mish’s chart is completely compatible with the arguments made in my two articles you linked to. His is a chart of REAL GDP, adjusted for changes to the purchasing power of the currency. I am on board with the idea that our real GDP growth over the next decade or whatever will be weak. Nominal GDP in comparison with Japan is a different story due to our vastly different monetary policy and the fact that our debt is not financed internally as it is in Japan.
Rich
September 25, 2009 at 7:52 AM #461999sdduuuudeParticipantJust so I understand, you are saying if inflation is 10% and nominal GDP is 5%, that is a real GDP of -5%? If not, please help w/ real GDP definition. Thanks.
September 25, 2009 at 7:52 AM #461381sdduuuudeParticipantJust so I understand, you are saying if inflation is 10% and nominal GDP is 5%, that is a real GDP of -5%? If not, please help w/ real GDP definition. Thanks.
September 25, 2009 at 7:52 AM #461795sdduuuudeParticipantJust so I understand, you are saying if inflation is 10% and nominal GDP is 5%, that is a real GDP of -5%? If not, please help w/ real GDP definition. Thanks.
September 25, 2009 at 7:52 AM #461187sdduuuudeParticipantJust so I understand, you are saying if inflation is 10% and nominal GDP is 5%, that is a real GDP of -5%? If not, please help w/ real GDP definition. Thanks.
September 25, 2009 at 7:52 AM #461722sdduuuudeParticipantJust so I understand, you are saying if inflation is 10% and nominal GDP is 5%, that is a real GDP of -5%? If not, please help w/ real GDP definition. Thanks.
September 25, 2009 at 7:53 AM #461727ArrayaParticipanthttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/recession/6190818/US-credit-shrinks-at-Great-Depression-rate-prompting-fears-of-double-dip-recession.html
Both bank credit and the M3 money supply in the United States have been contracting at rates comparable to the onset of the Great Depression since early summer, raising fears of a double-dip recession in 2010 and a slide into debt-deflation.September 25, 2009 at 7:53 AM #462004ArrayaParticipanthttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/recession/6190818/US-credit-shrinks-at-Great-Depression-rate-prompting-fears-of-double-dip-recession.html
Both bank credit and the M3 money supply in the United States have been contracting at rates comparable to the onset of the Great Depression since early summer, raising fears of a double-dip recession in 2010 and a slide into debt-deflation.September 25, 2009 at 7:53 AM #461800ArrayaParticipanthttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/recession/6190818/US-credit-shrinks-at-Great-Depression-rate-prompting-fears-of-double-dip-recession.html
Both bank credit and the M3 money supply in the United States have been contracting at rates comparable to the onset of the Great Depression since early summer, raising fears of a double-dip recession in 2010 and a slide into debt-deflation.September 25, 2009 at 7:53 AM #461192ArrayaParticipanthttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/recession/6190818/US-credit-shrinks-at-Great-Depression-rate-prompting-fears-of-double-dip-recession.html
Both bank credit and the M3 money supply in the United States have been contracting at rates comparable to the onset of the Great Depression since early summer, raising fears of a double-dip recession in 2010 and a slide into debt-deflation. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.