- This topic has 65 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 15, 2010 at 6:15 AM #18077October 15, 2010 at 7:02 AM #618459AnonymousGuest
There are multiple deeds.
Seller has a grant deed.
Leinholder has a trust deed.
Or something like that
ask an attorney 🙂
October 15, 2010 at 7:02 AM #619530AnonymousGuestThere are multiple deeds.
Seller has a grant deed.
Leinholder has a trust deed.
Or something like that
ask an attorney 🙂
October 15, 2010 at 7:02 AM #619212AnonymousGuestThere are multiple deeds.
Seller has a grant deed.
Leinholder has a trust deed.
Or something like that
ask an attorney 🙂
October 15, 2010 at 7:02 AM #619095AnonymousGuestThere are multiple deeds.
Seller has a grant deed.
Leinholder has a trust deed.
Or something like that
ask an attorney 🙂
October 15, 2010 at 7:02 AM #618544AnonymousGuestThere are multiple deeds.
Seller has a grant deed.
Leinholder has a trust deed.
Or something like that
ask an attorney 🙂
October 15, 2010 at 7:32 AM #619220bubba99ParticipantYes, I think this is a real problem. For centuries, all property records were kept at the local county recorders office. With MERS, that all ended. The notion of a Trust Deed that gave title to a property or (loan on a property) is forever clouded. In the “old days” the paper deed was kept at the bank and returned to the homeowner when the note was paid. The county had all the appropriate records recorded in their “books”
But that “paper” never existed for many of the note resale’s under MERS. There very well could be multiple people who believe they own a note on a particular property – MERS is the only record. The original trust deed lost forever.
The county would charge a recording fee each time a title was changed or encumbered. But not under MERS, the funds were never paid the changes never record, but the fore closers want the counties to enforce their implied claim anyhow.
I suppose that title companies could just insure the hell out of a sale until the claims forced another AIG type of bailout We are in for a long ride.
October 15, 2010 at 7:32 AM #619540bubba99ParticipantYes, I think this is a real problem. For centuries, all property records were kept at the local county recorders office. With MERS, that all ended. The notion of a Trust Deed that gave title to a property or (loan on a property) is forever clouded. In the “old days” the paper deed was kept at the bank and returned to the homeowner when the note was paid. The county had all the appropriate records recorded in their “books”
But that “paper” never existed for many of the note resale’s under MERS. There very well could be multiple people who believe they own a note on a particular property – MERS is the only record. The original trust deed lost forever.
The county would charge a recording fee each time a title was changed or encumbered. But not under MERS, the funds were never paid the changes never record, but the fore closers want the counties to enforce their implied claim anyhow.
I suppose that title companies could just insure the hell out of a sale until the claims forced another AIG type of bailout We are in for a long ride.
October 15, 2010 at 7:32 AM #619104bubba99ParticipantYes, I think this is a real problem. For centuries, all property records were kept at the local county recorders office. With MERS, that all ended. The notion of a Trust Deed that gave title to a property or (loan on a property) is forever clouded. In the “old days” the paper deed was kept at the bank and returned to the homeowner when the note was paid. The county had all the appropriate records recorded in their “books”
But that “paper” never existed for many of the note resale’s under MERS. There very well could be multiple people who believe they own a note on a particular property – MERS is the only record. The original trust deed lost forever.
The county would charge a recording fee each time a title was changed or encumbered. But not under MERS, the funds were never paid the changes never record, but the fore closers want the counties to enforce their implied claim anyhow.
I suppose that title companies could just insure the hell out of a sale until the claims forced another AIG type of bailout We are in for a long ride.
October 15, 2010 at 7:32 AM #618554bubba99ParticipantYes, I think this is a real problem. For centuries, all property records were kept at the local county recorders office. With MERS, that all ended. The notion of a Trust Deed that gave title to a property or (loan on a property) is forever clouded. In the “old days” the paper deed was kept at the bank and returned to the homeowner when the note was paid. The county had all the appropriate records recorded in their “books”
But that “paper” never existed for many of the note resale’s under MERS. There very well could be multiple people who believe they own a note on a particular property – MERS is the only record. The original trust deed lost forever.
The county would charge a recording fee each time a title was changed or encumbered. But not under MERS, the funds were never paid the changes never record, but the fore closers want the counties to enforce their implied claim anyhow.
I suppose that title companies could just insure the hell out of a sale until the claims forced another AIG type of bailout We are in for a long ride.
October 15, 2010 at 7:32 AM #618469bubba99ParticipantYes, I think this is a real problem. For centuries, all property records were kept at the local county recorders office. With MERS, that all ended. The notion of a Trust Deed that gave title to a property or (loan on a property) is forever clouded. In the “old days” the paper deed was kept at the bank and returned to the homeowner when the note was paid. The county had all the appropriate records recorded in their “books”
But that “paper” never existed for many of the note resale’s under MERS. There very well could be multiple people who believe they own a note on a particular property – MERS is the only record. The original trust deed lost forever.
The county would charge a recording fee each time a title was changed or encumbered. But not under MERS, the funds were never paid the changes never record, but the fore closers want the counties to enforce their implied claim anyhow.
I suppose that title companies could just insure the hell out of a sale until the claims forced another AIG type of bailout We are in for a long ride.
October 15, 2010 at 7:52 AM #618559jpinpbParticipantSo this may be a problem w/a traditional, organic sale also?
October 15, 2010 at 7:52 AM #619109jpinpbParticipantSo this may be a problem w/a traditional, organic sale also?
October 15, 2010 at 7:52 AM #619225jpinpbParticipantSo this may be a problem w/a traditional, organic sale also?
October 15, 2010 at 7:52 AM #618474jpinpbParticipantSo this may be a problem w/a traditional, organic sale also?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.