- This topic has 275 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by kewp.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 9, 2008 at 9:11 AM #284302October 9, 2008 at 9:19 AM #283981peterbParticipant
The market may be the one that shrinks govt.
Since all govt’s run on debt and debts going up…they may have no other choice. Oh, wouldnt that be so cool!! The sharp knife of the market spanking those friggin politicians and all the groups they cater to… I know, I’m dreaming. But a guy needs his dreams.October 9, 2008 at 9:19 AM #284268peterbParticipantThe market may be the one that shrinks govt.
Since all govt’s run on debt and debts going up…they may have no other choice. Oh, wouldnt that be so cool!! The sharp knife of the market spanking those friggin politicians and all the groups they cater to… I know, I’m dreaming. But a guy needs his dreams.October 9, 2008 at 9:19 AM #284293peterbParticipantThe market may be the one that shrinks govt.
Since all govt’s run on debt and debts going up…they may have no other choice. Oh, wouldnt that be so cool!! The sharp knife of the market spanking those friggin politicians and all the groups they cater to… I know, I’m dreaming. But a guy needs his dreams.October 9, 2008 at 9:19 AM #284311peterbParticipantThe market may be the one that shrinks govt.
Since all govt’s run on debt and debts going up…they may have no other choice. Oh, wouldnt that be so cool!! The sharp knife of the market spanking those friggin politicians and all the groups they cater to… I know, I’m dreaming. But a guy needs his dreams.October 9, 2008 at 9:19 AM #284322peterbParticipantThe market may be the one that shrinks govt.
Since all govt’s run on debt and debts going up…they may have no other choice. Oh, wouldnt that be so cool!! The sharp knife of the market spanking those friggin politicians and all the groups they cater to… I know, I’m dreaming. But a guy needs his dreams.October 9, 2008 at 9:52 AM #284012AecetiaParticipantI think you will see a lot of civilianization, down sizing, right sizing, out sourcing (where possible) and ultimately regionalization where there are duplicate and over lapping responsibilities. Regional law enforcement and fire fighting would make more sense than every municipality having its own small army. The overhead costs of administration are egregious and the taxpayers are not getting the kind of service they pay for in many cases. Many agencies will not send an officer out to take a report in certain cases, but instead have the “victim” drive to the station or call in the report. Some of these cost savings make a lot of sense, but it also is a way of scaling back service to cut costs. The costs are up and the service is down.
October 9, 2008 at 9:52 AM #284299AecetiaParticipantI think you will see a lot of civilianization, down sizing, right sizing, out sourcing (where possible) and ultimately regionalization where there are duplicate and over lapping responsibilities. Regional law enforcement and fire fighting would make more sense than every municipality having its own small army. The overhead costs of administration are egregious and the taxpayers are not getting the kind of service they pay for in many cases. Many agencies will not send an officer out to take a report in certain cases, but instead have the “victim” drive to the station or call in the report. Some of these cost savings make a lot of sense, but it also is a way of scaling back service to cut costs. The costs are up and the service is down.
October 9, 2008 at 9:52 AM #284323AecetiaParticipantI think you will see a lot of civilianization, down sizing, right sizing, out sourcing (where possible) and ultimately regionalization where there are duplicate and over lapping responsibilities. Regional law enforcement and fire fighting would make more sense than every municipality having its own small army. The overhead costs of administration are egregious and the taxpayers are not getting the kind of service they pay for in many cases. Many agencies will not send an officer out to take a report in certain cases, but instead have the “victim” drive to the station or call in the report. Some of these cost savings make a lot of sense, but it also is a way of scaling back service to cut costs. The costs are up and the service is down.
October 9, 2008 at 9:52 AM #284341AecetiaParticipantI think you will see a lot of civilianization, down sizing, right sizing, out sourcing (where possible) and ultimately regionalization where there are duplicate and over lapping responsibilities. Regional law enforcement and fire fighting would make more sense than every municipality having its own small army. The overhead costs of administration are egregious and the taxpayers are not getting the kind of service they pay for in many cases. Many agencies will not send an officer out to take a report in certain cases, but instead have the “victim” drive to the station or call in the report. Some of these cost savings make a lot of sense, but it also is a way of scaling back service to cut costs. The costs are up and the service is down.
October 9, 2008 at 9:52 AM #284352AecetiaParticipantI think you will see a lot of civilianization, down sizing, right sizing, out sourcing (where possible) and ultimately regionalization where there are duplicate and over lapping responsibilities. Regional law enforcement and fire fighting would make more sense than every municipality having its own small army. The overhead costs of administration are egregious and the taxpayers are not getting the kind of service they pay for in many cases. Many agencies will not send an officer out to take a report in certain cases, but instead have the “victim” drive to the station or call in the report. Some of these cost savings make a lot of sense, but it also is a way of scaling back service to cut costs. The costs are up and the service is down.
October 9, 2008 at 10:26 AM #284017gandalfParticipantWho are these right-wing goofs talking about fiscal responsibility?
Government grew at the biggest pace in history under Bush/Republican rule. Most of was funded with borrowing, long-term debt hanging over my generation.
Because of the GOP, we’re unquestionably in worse shape now with respect to energy, foreign policy and the economy.
Obama/Biden ’08
October 9, 2008 at 10:26 AM #284304gandalfParticipantWho are these right-wing goofs talking about fiscal responsibility?
Government grew at the biggest pace in history under Bush/Republican rule. Most of was funded with borrowing, long-term debt hanging over my generation.
Because of the GOP, we’re unquestionably in worse shape now with respect to energy, foreign policy and the economy.
Obama/Biden ’08
October 9, 2008 at 10:26 AM #284329gandalfParticipantWho are these right-wing goofs talking about fiscal responsibility?
Government grew at the biggest pace in history under Bush/Republican rule. Most of was funded with borrowing, long-term debt hanging over my generation.
Because of the GOP, we’re unquestionably in worse shape now with respect to energy, foreign policy and the economy.
Obama/Biden ’08
October 9, 2008 at 10:26 AM #284346gandalfParticipantWho are these right-wing goofs talking about fiscal responsibility?
Government grew at the biggest pace in history under Bush/Republican rule. Most of was funded with borrowing, long-term debt hanging over my generation.
Because of the GOP, we’re unquestionably in worse shape now with respect to energy, foreign policy and the economy.
Obama/Biden ’08
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.