- This topic has 850 replies, 51 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by sobmaz.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 22, 2010 at 10:14 PM #530337March 22, 2010 at 10:15 PM #529406RicechexParticipant
Yep, follow the money. No clue how this will pan out, but it is guaranteed to be worse either by quality of service, and/or by increased taxation. It may be worth it sometime soon to risk the $2000 fine, and pay for medical costs out of pocket. Dental “insurance” is really a “dental plan”—pay now or pay as you go….costs the same essentially.
Lots of fuzzy warm feelings to provide medical care for all. It’s nice to be altruistic, but altruism isn’t running the show here. The corporation is and there is no way that this would have gotten passed if SOMEONE wasn’t getting paid.
There is a worm in dat dere apple, we just can’t see it–YET. Partypup and Arraya called it out. Simply put, it is a bait and switch.
March 22, 2010 at 10:15 PM #529535RicechexParticipantYep, follow the money. No clue how this will pan out, but it is guaranteed to be worse either by quality of service, and/or by increased taxation. It may be worth it sometime soon to risk the $2000 fine, and pay for medical costs out of pocket. Dental “insurance” is really a “dental plan”—pay now or pay as you go….costs the same essentially.
Lots of fuzzy warm feelings to provide medical care for all. It’s nice to be altruistic, but altruism isn’t running the show here. The corporation is and there is no way that this would have gotten passed if SOMEONE wasn’t getting paid.
There is a worm in dat dere apple, we just can’t see it–YET. Partypup and Arraya called it out. Simply put, it is a bait and switch.
March 22, 2010 at 10:15 PM #529984RicechexParticipantYep, follow the money. No clue how this will pan out, but it is guaranteed to be worse either by quality of service, and/or by increased taxation. It may be worth it sometime soon to risk the $2000 fine, and pay for medical costs out of pocket. Dental “insurance” is really a “dental plan”—pay now or pay as you go….costs the same essentially.
Lots of fuzzy warm feelings to provide medical care for all. It’s nice to be altruistic, but altruism isn’t running the show here. The corporation is and there is no way that this would have gotten passed if SOMEONE wasn’t getting paid.
There is a worm in dat dere apple, we just can’t see it–YET. Partypup and Arraya called it out. Simply put, it is a bait and switch.
March 22, 2010 at 10:15 PM #530083RicechexParticipantYep, follow the money. No clue how this will pan out, but it is guaranteed to be worse either by quality of service, and/or by increased taxation. It may be worth it sometime soon to risk the $2000 fine, and pay for medical costs out of pocket. Dental “insurance” is really a “dental plan”—pay now or pay as you go….costs the same essentially.
Lots of fuzzy warm feelings to provide medical care for all. It’s nice to be altruistic, but altruism isn’t running the show here. The corporation is and there is no way that this would have gotten passed if SOMEONE wasn’t getting paid.
There is a worm in dat dere apple, we just can’t see it–YET. Partypup and Arraya called it out. Simply put, it is a bait and switch.
March 22, 2010 at 10:15 PM #530342RicechexParticipantYep, follow the money. No clue how this will pan out, but it is guaranteed to be worse either by quality of service, and/or by increased taxation. It may be worth it sometime soon to risk the $2000 fine, and pay for medical costs out of pocket. Dental “insurance” is really a “dental plan”—pay now or pay as you go….costs the same essentially.
Lots of fuzzy warm feelings to provide medical care for all. It’s nice to be altruistic, but altruism isn’t running the show here. The corporation is and there is no way that this would have gotten passed if SOMEONE wasn’t getting paid.
There is a worm in dat dere apple, we just can’t see it–YET. Partypup and Arraya called it out. Simply put, it is a bait and switch.
March 22, 2010 at 10:21 PM #529411ArrayaParticipanthttp://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_health_care_hindenburg_has_landed_20100322/
This bill is not about fiscal responsibility or the common good. The bill is about increasing corporate profit at taxpayer expense. It is the health care industry’s version of the Wall Street bailout. It lavishes hundreds of billions in government subsidies on insurance and drug companies. The some 3,000 health care lobbyists in Washington, whose dirty little hands are all over the bill, have once more betrayed the American people for money. The bill is another example of why change will never come from within the Democratic Party. The party is owned and managed by corporations. The five largest private health insurers and their trade group, America’s Health Insurance Plans, spent more than $6 million on lobbying in the first quarter of 2009. Pfizer, the world’s biggest drug maker, spent more than $9 million during the last quarter of 2008 and the first three months of 2009. The Washington Post reported that up to 30 members of Congress from both parties who hold key committee memberships have major investments in health care companies totaling between $11 million and $27 million. President Barack Obama’s director of health care policy, who will not discuss single payer as an option, has served on the boards of several health care corporations. And as salaries for most Americans have stagnated or declined during the past decade, health insurance profits have risen by 480 percent.March 22, 2010 at 10:21 PM #529540ArrayaParticipanthttp://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_health_care_hindenburg_has_landed_20100322/
This bill is not about fiscal responsibility or the common good. The bill is about increasing corporate profit at taxpayer expense. It is the health care industry’s version of the Wall Street bailout. It lavishes hundreds of billions in government subsidies on insurance and drug companies. The some 3,000 health care lobbyists in Washington, whose dirty little hands are all over the bill, have once more betrayed the American people for money. The bill is another example of why change will never come from within the Democratic Party. The party is owned and managed by corporations. The five largest private health insurers and their trade group, America’s Health Insurance Plans, spent more than $6 million on lobbying in the first quarter of 2009. Pfizer, the world’s biggest drug maker, spent more than $9 million during the last quarter of 2008 and the first three months of 2009. The Washington Post reported that up to 30 members of Congress from both parties who hold key committee memberships have major investments in health care companies totaling between $11 million and $27 million. President Barack Obama’s director of health care policy, who will not discuss single payer as an option, has served on the boards of several health care corporations. And as salaries for most Americans have stagnated or declined during the past decade, health insurance profits have risen by 480 percent.March 22, 2010 at 10:21 PM #529989ArrayaParticipanthttp://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_health_care_hindenburg_has_landed_20100322/
This bill is not about fiscal responsibility or the common good. The bill is about increasing corporate profit at taxpayer expense. It is the health care industry’s version of the Wall Street bailout. It lavishes hundreds of billions in government subsidies on insurance and drug companies. The some 3,000 health care lobbyists in Washington, whose dirty little hands are all over the bill, have once more betrayed the American people for money. The bill is another example of why change will never come from within the Democratic Party. The party is owned and managed by corporations. The five largest private health insurers and their trade group, America’s Health Insurance Plans, spent more than $6 million on lobbying in the first quarter of 2009. Pfizer, the world’s biggest drug maker, spent more than $9 million during the last quarter of 2008 and the first three months of 2009. The Washington Post reported that up to 30 members of Congress from both parties who hold key committee memberships have major investments in health care companies totaling between $11 million and $27 million. President Barack Obama’s director of health care policy, who will not discuss single payer as an option, has served on the boards of several health care corporations. And as salaries for most Americans have stagnated or declined during the past decade, health insurance profits have risen by 480 percent.March 22, 2010 at 10:21 PM #530088ArrayaParticipanthttp://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_health_care_hindenburg_has_landed_20100322/
This bill is not about fiscal responsibility or the common good. The bill is about increasing corporate profit at taxpayer expense. It is the health care industry’s version of the Wall Street bailout. It lavishes hundreds of billions in government subsidies on insurance and drug companies. The some 3,000 health care lobbyists in Washington, whose dirty little hands are all over the bill, have once more betrayed the American people for money. The bill is another example of why change will never come from within the Democratic Party. The party is owned and managed by corporations. The five largest private health insurers and their trade group, America’s Health Insurance Plans, spent more than $6 million on lobbying in the first quarter of 2009. Pfizer, the world’s biggest drug maker, spent more than $9 million during the last quarter of 2008 and the first three months of 2009. The Washington Post reported that up to 30 members of Congress from both parties who hold key committee memberships have major investments in health care companies totaling between $11 million and $27 million. President Barack Obama’s director of health care policy, who will not discuss single payer as an option, has served on the boards of several health care corporations. And as salaries for most Americans have stagnated or declined during the past decade, health insurance profits have risen by 480 percent.March 22, 2010 at 10:21 PM #530347ArrayaParticipanthttp://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_health_care_hindenburg_has_landed_20100322/
This bill is not about fiscal responsibility or the common good. The bill is about increasing corporate profit at taxpayer expense. It is the health care industry’s version of the Wall Street bailout. It lavishes hundreds of billions in government subsidies on insurance and drug companies. The some 3,000 health care lobbyists in Washington, whose dirty little hands are all over the bill, have once more betrayed the American people for money. The bill is another example of why change will never come from within the Democratic Party. The party is owned and managed by corporations. The five largest private health insurers and their trade group, America’s Health Insurance Plans, spent more than $6 million on lobbying in the first quarter of 2009. Pfizer, the world’s biggest drug maker, spent more than $9 million during the last quarter of 2008 and the first three months of 2009. The Washington Post reported that up to 30 members of Congress from both parties who hold key committee memberships have major investments in health care companies totaling between $11 million and $27 million. President Barack Obama’s director of health care policy, who will not discuss single payer as an option, has served on the boards of several health care corporations. And as salaries for most Americans have stagnated or declined during the past decade, health insurance profits have risen by 480 percent.March 22, 2010 at 10:24 PM #529416AnonymousGuest[quote=bob2007]
In reading many of these posts I hear a lot of whining about payment, which can only mean many here think the government should give them a free ride. Thats sad. If you have this opinion you are pretty sure you won’t achieve enough to cover yourself. It also means those of us who do have to pay for you. Why do I have to pay for you? [/quote]Nope, I actually have pretty decent insurance and also make enough to cover whatever my health insurance doesn’t cover. However, I also know that there are millions out there who don’t have health insurance. Out of the many things my taxes are used for (war, banker bonuses, roads to nowhere, stimulus, etc), this is one of the few things that I’m proud to help pay for.
March 22, 2010 at 10:24 PM #529546AnonymousGuest[quote=bob2007]
In reading many of these posts I hear a lot of whining about payment, which can only mean many here think the government should give them a free ride. Thats sad. If you have this opinion you are pretty sure you won’t achieve enough to cover yourself. It also means those of us who do have to pay for you. Why do I have to pay for you? [/quote]Nope, I actually have pretty decent insurance and also make enough to cover whatever my health insurance doesn’t cover. However, I also know that there are millions out there who don’t have health insurance. Out of the many things my taxes are used for (war, banker bonuses, roads to nowhere, stimulus, etc), this is one of the few things that I’m proud to help pay for.
March 22, 2010 at 10:24 PM #529994AnonymousGuest[quote=bob2007]
In reading many of these posts I hear a lot of whining about payment, which can only mean many here think the government should give them a free ride. Thats sad. If you have this opinion you are pretty sure you won’t achieve enough to cover yourself. It also means those of us who do have to pay for you. Why do I have to pay for you? [/quote]Nope, I actually have pretty decent insurance and also make enough to cover whatever my health insurance doesn’t cover. However, I also know that there are millions out there who don’t have health insurance. Out of the many things my taxes are used for (war, banker bonuses, roads to nowhere, stimulus, etc), this is one of the few things that I’m proud to help pay for.
March 22, 2010 at 10:24 PM #530093AnonymousGuest[quote=bob2007]
In reading many of these posts I hear a lot of whining about payment, which can only mean many here think the government should give them a free ride. Thats sad. If you have this opinion you are pretty sure you won’t achieve enough to cover yourself. It also means those of us who do have to pay for you. Why do I have to pay for you? [/quote]Nope, I actually have pretty decent insurance and also make enough to cover whatever my health insurance doesn’t cover. However, I also know that there are millions out there who don’t have health insurance. Out of the many things my taxes are used for (war, banker bonuses, roads to nowhere, stimulus, etc), this is one of the few things that I’m proud to help pay for.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.