- This topic has 625 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 4 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 1, 2011 at 10:41 AM #648045January 1, 2011 at 11:46 AM #646941
Scarlett
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]So I am not sure about the statement about San Carlos being the same distance to La Jolla as PQ or Scripps. That said the TIME from Scripps or PQ to La Jolla may not appreciably differ because those commutes suck as well. I am very familar with them.[/quote]
You have a good point there. It seems, based on speed sensors data, that the rush hour = slow traffic on 52 is not as spread out as let’s say 5 or 56 (which are like, 3 hrs), in other words allows more flexibility. From the LJ end of 52 to Mission Gorge takes 15′ at non rush and 25-30′ at rush hour, if I believe the sensor data. Add 10′ on each end on city streets for the commute. So commute wise San Carlos is not that bad. But PQ commute via 52 is better.
January 1, 2011 at 11:46 AM #647014Participant[quote=SD Realtor]So I am not sure about the statement about San Carlos being the same distance to La Jolla as PQ or Scripps. That said the TIME from Scripps or PQ to La Jolla may not appreciably differ because those commutes suck as well. I am very familar with them.[/quote]
You have a good point there. It seems, based on speed sensors data, that the rush hour = slow traffic on 52 is not as spread out as let’s say 5 or 56 (which are like, 3 hrs), in other words allows more flexibility. From the LJ end of 52 to Mission Gorge takes 15′ at non rush and 25-30′ at rush hour, if I believe the sensor data. Add 10′ on each end on city streets for the commute. So commute wise San Carlos is not that bad. But PQ commute via 52 is better.
January 1, 2011 at 11:46 AM #647599Participant[quote=SD Realtor]So I am not sure about the statement about San Carlos being the same distance to La Jolla as PQ or Scripps. That said the TIME from Scripps or PQ to La Jolla may not appreciably differ because those commutes suck as well. I am very familar with them.[/quote]
You have a good point there. It seems, based on speed sensors data, that the rush hour = slow traffic on 52 is not as spread out as let’s say 5 or 56 (which are like, 3 hrs), in other words allows more flexibility. From the LJ end of 52 to Mission Gorge takes 15′ at non rush and 25-30′ at rush hour, if I believe the sensor data. Add 10′ on each end on city streets for the commute. So commute wise San Carlos is not that bad. But PQ commute via 52 is better.
January 1, 2011 at 11:46 AM #647736Participant[quote=SD Realtor]So I am not sure about the statement about San Carlos being the same distance to La Jolla as PQ or Scripps. That said the TIME from Scripps or PQ to La Jolla may not appreciably differ because those commutes suck as well. I am very familar with them.[/quote]
You have a good point there. It seems, based on speed sensors data, that the rush hour = slow traffic on 52 is not as spread out as let’s say 5 or 56 (which are like, 3 hrs), in other words allows more flexibility. From the LJ end of 52 to Mission Gorge takes 15′ at non rush and 25-30′ at rush hour, if I believe the sensor data. Add 10′ on each end on city streets for the commute. So commute wise San Carlos is not that bad. But PQ commute via 52 is better.
January 1, 2011 at 11:46 AM #648060Participant[quote=SD Realtor]So I am not sure about the statement about San Carlos being the same distance to La Jolla as PQ or Scripps. That said the TIME from Scripps or PQ to La Jolla may not appreciably differ because those commutes suck as well. I am very familar with them.[/quote]
You have a good point there. It seems, based on speed sensors data, that the rush hour = slow traffic on 52 is not as spread out as let’s say 5 or 56 (which are like, 3 hrs), in other words allows more flexibility. From the LJ end of 52 to Mission Gorge takes 15′ at non rush and 25-30′ at rush hour, if I believe the sensor data. Add 10′ on each end on city streets for the commute. So commute wise San Carlos is not that bad. But PQ commute via 52 is better.
January 1, 2011 at 12:54 PM #646951poorgradstudent
ParticipantSeems like a combo of seasonal drop, the 8,000 credit from the spring still deflating and a very slow economic recovery.
January 1, 2011 at 12:54 PM #647024ParticipantSeems like a combo of seasonal drop, the 8,000 credit from the spring still deflating and a very slow economic recovery.
January 1, 2011 at 12:54 PM #647609ParticipantSeems like a combo of seasonal drop, the 8,000 credit from the spring still deflating and a very slow economic recovery.
January 1, 2011 at 12:54 PM #647746ParticipantSeems like a combo of seasonal drop, the 8,000 credit from the spring still deflating and a very slow economic recovery.
January 1, 2011 at 12:54 PM #648070ParticipantSeems like a combo of seasonal drop, the 8,000 credit from the spring still deflating and a very slow economic recovery.
January 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM #646966SD Realtor
ParticipantGuess all those green shoots that the govt told us about all of last year turned out to be weeds…
January 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM #647039ParticipantGuess all those green shoots that the govt told us about all of last year turned out to be weeds…
January 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM #647624ParticipantGuess all those green shoots that the govt told us about all of last year turned out to be weeds…
January 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM #647761ParticipantGuess all those green shoots that the govt told us about all of last year turned out to be weeds…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.