The White House Freezing Loans for 5-Years

[The OC Scam]

THIS IS WHY I JUST BOUGHT A HOUSE I NOT SURE I CAN AFFORD!

WHO CARES JOIN THE OTHER BLIND AMERICANS!!!

[gary_broker]

Four years ago I believed Bush’s legacy would become stellar many years down the road. I have done a 180 on this thinking. This is one of the lamest polictal proposals ever conceived. Sends the wrong message, helps the wrong people etc..etc..

[gary_broker]

Four years ago I believed Bush’s legacy would become stellar many years down the road. I have done a 180 on this thinking. This is one of the lamest polictal proposals ever conceived. Sends the wrong message, helps the wrong people etc..etc..

[gary_broker]

Four years ago I believed Bush’s legacy would become stellar many years down the road. I have done a 180 on this thinking. This is one of the lamest polictal proposals ever conceived. Sends the wrong message, helps the wrong people etc..etc..

[gary_broker]

Four years ago I believed Bush’s legacy would become stellar many years down the road. I have done a 180 on this thinking. This is one of the lamest polictal proposals ever conceived. Sends the wrong message, helps the wrong people etc..etc..

[gary_broker]

Four years ago I believed Bush’s legacy would become stellar many years down the road. I have done a 180 on this thinking. This is one of the lamest polictal proposals ever conceived. Sends the wrong message, helps the wrong people etc..etc..

[donaldduckmoore]

Who is to lose in this deal? The banks or the tax payers? The banks will never do business without profit, so I doubt the banks must have some goodies from the gov. Then, we the tax payers, what do we lose from this.

Although I don’t think this will help a lot of people, “thousands over millions”, but this is against the concept of capitalism and open market economy. We always blame China about too much legislative and administrative control over their economy and currency policy. What happen to us. We are doing the same thing here big time. What open market, it is purely “artificial”. Our new economic direction is “communitalism”.

[donaldduckmoore]

Who is to lose in this deal? The banks or the tax payers? The banks will never do business without profit, so I doubt the banks must have some goodies from the gov. Then, we the tax payers, what do we lose from this.

Although I don’t think this will help a lot of people, “thousands over millions”, but this is against the concept of capitalism and open market economy. We always blame China about too much legislative and administrative control over their economy and currency policy. What happen to us. We are doing the same thing here big time. What open market, it is purely “artificial”. Our new economic direction is “communitalism”.

[donaldduckmoore]

Who is to lose in this deal? The banks or the tax payers? The banks will never do business without profit, so I doubt the banks must have some goodies from the gov. Then, we the tax payers, what do we lose from this.

Although I don’t think this will help a lot of people, “thousands over millions”, but this is against the concept of capitalism and open market economy. We always blame China about too much legislative and administrative control over their economy and currency policy. What happen to us. We are doing the same thing here big time. What open market, it is purely “artificial”. Our new economic direction is “communitalism”.

[donaldduckmoore]

Who is to lose in this deal? The banks or the tax payers? The banks will never do business without profit, so I doubt the banks must have some goodies from the gov. Then, we the tax payers, what do we lose from this.

Although I don’t think this will help a lot of people, “thousands over millions”, but this is against the concept of capitalism and open market economy. We always blame China about too much legislative and administrative control over their economy and currency policy. What happen to us. We are doing the same thing here big time. What open market, it is purely “artificial”. Our new economic direction is “communitalism”.

[donaldduckmoore]

Who is to lose in this deal? The banks or the tax payers? The banks will never do business without profit, so I doubt the banks must have some goodies from the gov. Then, we the tax payers, what do we lose from this.

Although I don’t think this will help a lot of people, “thousands over millions”, but this is against the concept of capitalism and open market economy. We always blame China about too much legislative and administrative control over their economy and currency policy. What happen to us. We are doing the same thing here big time. What open market, it is purely “artificial”. Our new economic direction is “communitalism”.

[LostCat]

This is Sad… Very very Sad. Maybe the white house is stepping in because it has become a threat to our national security.

[LostCat]

This is Sad… Very very Sad. Maybe the white house is stepping in because it has become a threat to our national security.

[LostCat]

This is Sad… Very very Sad. Maybe the white house is stepping in because it has become a threat to our national security.

[LostCat]

This is Sad… Very very Sad. Maybe the white house is stepping in because it has become a threat to our national security.

[Author]

Posts