Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › The Rise of the Rest – Newsweek
- This topic has 195 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by kewp.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 7, 2008 at 2:37 PM #200805May 7, 2008 at 5:58 PM #200912dbapigParticipant
Werewolf,
“The South Koreans would love to throw out the US from the military bases.” –> Absolutely not true.
I’m not sure if you were of Korean descent or related to Korea in any way but US military presence in Korea is necessary. Sure it’s inconvenient but look at the map.
N. Korea is just across the border from S. Korea. There is a reason US didn’t attack (limited or all out) N. Korea when US found out N. Korea was developing nukes. And US gov’t seriously considered this. Any kind of war (limited or all out) will cause the kind of destruction and deaths that will make the war in Iraq look a minor event. If you didn’t know this already, you are obviously not qualified enough to make such a statement re US military presence in S. Korea.
And why would you not want a war on Korean peninsula? There are many but since you talk about following the money, the answer I’d give you is that S. Korea has 10th or 11th largest economy. Hence S. Korea consumes lots of products from US.
You are free to have your own opinions but please don’t make statement re Korea when you don’t know that much. Mean no offense.
Besides, S. Korea is one of the best examples of nation-building that worked, although it took 40 + yrs before a democracy was able to take root. I guess that’s why it is/was foolish to believe that Iraq can be a democratic nation in the time period our gov’t led us to believe. S. Korea doesn’t have the kind of religious conflicts like Iraq and it still took 40+ yrs for it to gain stable democracy…
May 7, 2008 at 5:58 PM #200953dbapigParticipantWerewolf,
“The South Koreans would love to throw out the US from the military bases.” –> Absolutely not true.
I’m not sure if you were of Korean descent or related to Korea in any way but US military presence in Korea is necessary. Sure it’s inconvenient but look at the map.
N. Korea is just across the border from S. Korea. There is a reason US didn’t attack (limited or all out) N. Korea when US found out N. Korea was developing nukes. And US gov’t seriously considered this. Any kind of war (limited or all out) will cause the kind of destruction and deaths that will make the war in Iraq look a minor event. If you didn’t know this already, you are obviously not qualified enough to make such a statement re US military presence in S. Korea.
And why would you not want a war on Korean peninsula? There are many but since you talk about following the money, the answer I’d give you is that S. Korea has 10th or 11th largest economy. Hence S. Korea consumes lots of products from US.
You are free to have your own opinions but please don’t make statement re Korea when you don’t know that much. Mean no offense.
Besides, S. Korea is one of the best examples of nation-building that worked, although it took 40 + yrs before a democracy was able to take root. I guess that’s why it is/was foolish to believe that Iraq can be a democratic nation in the time period our gov’t led us to believe. S. Korea doesn’t have the kind of religious conflicts like Iraq and it still took 40+ yrs for it to gain stable democracy…
May 7, 2008 at 5:58 PM #200980dbapigParticipantWerewolf,
“The South Koreans would love to throw out the US from the military bases.” –> Absolutely not true.
I’m not sure if you were of Korean descent or related to Korea in any way but US military presence in Korea is necessary. Sure it’s inconvenient but look at the map.
N. Korea is just across the border from S. Korea. There is a reason US didn’t attack (limited or all out) N. Korea when US found out N. Korea was developing nukes. And US gov’t seriously considered this. Any kind of war (limited or all out) will cause the kind of destruction and deaths that will make the war in Iraq look a minor event. If you didn’t know this already, you are obviously not qualified enough to make such a statement re US military presence in S. Korea.
And why would you not want a war on Korean peninsula? There are many but since you talk about following the money, the answer I’d give you is that S. Korea has 10th or 11th largest economy. Hence S. Korea consumes lots of products from US.
You are free to have your own opinions but please don’t make statement re Korea when you don’t know that much. Mean no offense.
Besides, S. Korea is one of the best examples of nation-building that worked, although it took 40 + yrs before a democracy was able to take root. I guess that’s why it is/was foolish to believe that Iraq can be a democratic nation in the time period our gov’t led us to believe. S. Korea doesn’t have the kind of religious conflicts like Iraq and it still took 40+ yrs for it to gain stable democracy…
May 7, 2008 at 5:58 PM #201005dbapigParticipantWerewolf,
“The South Koreans would love to throw out the US from the military bases.” –> Absolutely not true.
I’m not sure if you were of Korean descent or related to Korea in any way but US military presence in Korea is necessary. Sure it’s inconvenient but look at the map.
N. Korea is just across the border from S. Korea. There is a reason US didn’t attack (limited or all out) N. Korea when US found out N. Korea was developing nukes. And US gov’t seriously considered this. Any kind of war (limited or all out) will cause the kind of destruction and deaths that will make the war in Iraq look a minor event. If you didn’t know this already, you are obviously not qualified enough to make such a statement re US military presence in S. Korea.
And why would you not want a war on Korean peninsula? There are many but since you talk about following the money, the answer I’d give you is that S. Korea has 10th or 11th largest economy. Hence S. Korea consumes lots of products from US.
You are free to have your own opinions but please don’t make statement re Korea when you don’t know that much. Mean no offense.
Besides, S. Korea is one of the best examples of nation-building that worked, although it took 40 + yrs before a democracy was able to take root. I guess that’s why it is/was foolish to believe that Iraq can be a democratic nation in the time period our gov’t led us to believe. S. Korea doesn’t have the kind of religious conflicts like Iraq and it still took 40+ yrs for it to gain stable democracy…
May 7, 2008 at 5:58 PM #201042dbapigParticipantWerewolf,
“The South Koreans would love to throw out the US from the military bases.” –> Absolutely not true.
I’m not sure if you were of Korean descent or related to Korea in any way but US military presence in Korea is necessary. Sure it’s inconvenient but look at the map.
N. Korea is just across the border from S. Korea. There is a reason US didn’t attack (limited or all out) N. Korea when US found out N. Korea was developing nukes. And US gov’t seriously considered this. Any kind of war (limited or all out) will cause the kind of destruction and deaths that will make the war in Iraq look a minor event. If you didn’t know this already, you are obviously not qualified enough to make such a statement re US military presence in S. Korea.
And why would you not want a war on Korean peninsula? There are many but since you talk about following the money, the answer I’d give you is that S. Korea has 10th or 11th largest economy. Hence S. Korea consumes lots of products from US.
You are free to have your own opinions but please don’t make statement re Korea when you don’t know that much. Mean no offense.
Besides, S. Korea is one of the best examples of nation-building that worked, although it took 40 + yrs before a democracy was able to take root. I guess that’s why it is/was foolish to believe that Iraq can be a democratic nation in the time period our gov’t led us to believe. S. Korea doesn’t have the kind of religious conflicts like Iraq and it still took 40+ yrs for it to gain stable democracy…
May 7, 2008 at 6:13 PM #200931stockstradrParticipant>> For better or worse, the U.S. is a meritocracy.
Close.
This country has become a mediocre-cracy. Mediocrity rules. A genius from China with a graduate degree cannot get into our country but TENS OF MILLIONS of mediocre illegal immigrants stream in every day from Mexico, and Central America. Our educational system is a joke. I could go on and on. Depressing.
May 7, 2008 at 6:13 PM #200973stockstradrParticipant>> For better or worse, the U.S. is a meritocracy.
Close.
This country has become a mediocre-cracy. Mediocrity rules. A genius from China with a graduate degree cannot get into our country but TENS OF MILLIONS of mediocre illegal immigrants stream in every day from Mexico, and Central America. Our educational system is a joke. I could go on and on. Depressing.
May 7, 2008 at 6:13 PM #200999stockstradrParticipant>> For better or worse, the U.S. is a meritocracy.
Close.
This country has become a mediocre-cracy. Mediocrity rules. A genius from China with a graduate degree cannot get into our country but TENS OF MILLIONS of mediocre illegal immigrants stream in every day from Mexico, and Central America. Our educational system is a joke. I could go on and on. Depressing.
May 7, 2008 at 6:13 PM #201026stockstradrParticipant>> For better or worse, the U.S. is a meritocracy.
Close.
This country has become a mediocre-cracy. Mediocrity rules. A genius from China with a graduate degree cannot get into our country but TENS OF MILLIONS of mediocre illegal immigrants stream in every day from Mexico, and Central America. Our educational system is a joke. I could go on and on. Depressing.
May 7, 2008 at 6:13 PM #201061stockstradrParticipant>> For better or worse, the U.S. is a meritocracy.
Close.
This country has become a mediocre-cracy. Mediocrity rules. A genius from China with a graduate degree cannot get into our country but TENS OF MILLIONS of mediocre illegal immigrants stream in every day from Mexico, and Central America. Our educational system is a joke. I could go on and on. Depressing.
May 7, 2008 at 6:42 PM #200949kewpParticipantThat’s why the wealthy are wealthy – for the most part, they know how to manage their money.
The vast majority of the wealthy people I know had rich parents!
May 7, 2008 at 6:42 PM #200993kewpParticipantThat’s why the wealthy are wealthy – for the most part, they know how to manage their money.
The vast majority of the wealthy people I know had rich parents!
May 7, 2008 at 6:42 PM #201019kewpParticipantThat’s why the wealthy are wealthy – for the most part, they know how to manage their money.
The vast majority of the wealthy people I know had rich parents!
May 7, 2008 at 6:42 PM #201046kewpParticipantThat’s why the wealthy are wealthy – for the most part, they know how to manage their money.
The vast majority of the wealthy people I know had rich parents!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.