Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › The Real Great Depression (Panic of 1873)
- This topic has 145 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 7, 2008 at 10:10 PM #283314October 8, 2008 at 2:30 PM #283438DaCounselorParticipant
“What’s truly changed is people’s attitude to debt. It’s no longer shameful
I wouldn’t say that.
I would say its the attitude of *defaulting* on debt that’s no longer shameful.”
__________________________I would say it’s both.
I would also say that we are very likely to see a shift back toward an anti-debt sentiment.
October 8, 2008 at 2:30 PM #283723DaCounselorParticipant“What’s truly changed is people’s attitude to debt. It’s no longer shameful
I wouldn’t say that.
I would say its the attitude of *defaulting* on debt that’s no longer shameful.”
__________________________I would say it’s both.
I would also say that we are very likely to see a shift back toward an anti-debt sentiment.
October 8, 2008 at 2:30 PM #283749DaCounselorParticipant“What’s truly changed is people’s attitude to debt. It’s no longer shameful
I wouldn’t say that.
I would say its the attitude of *defaulting* on debt that’s no longer shameful.”
__________________________I would say it’s both.
I would also say that we are very likely to see a shift back toward an anti-debt sentiment.
October 8, 2008 at 2:30 PM #283767DaCounselorParticipant“What’s truly changed is people’s attitude to debt. It’s no longer shameful
I wouldn’t say that.
I would say its the attitude of *defaulting* on debt that’s no longer shameful.”
__________________________I would say it’s both.
I would also say that we are very likely to see a shift back toward an anti-debt sentiment.
October 8, 2008 at 2:30 PM #283776DaCounselorParticipant“What’s truly changed is people’s attitude to debt. It’s no longer shameful
I wouldn’t say that.
I would say its the attitude of *defaulting* on debt that’s no longer shameful.”
__________________________I would say it’s both.
I would also say that we are very likely to see a shift back toward an anti-debt sentiment.
October 8, 2008 at 11:39 PM #283736greekfireParticipantI have been searching for answers to our current problems quite a bit in the past couple years or so. I am convinced now, more than ever, that unless we know our history we are doomed to repeat it. I used to think this was a tired cliche, but it has won me over now. Nearly all of the problems that we are facing today have been faced before in our nation’s history in one form or another. We’d be wise to study our own history better because we are well into the process of repeating it all over again.
October 8, 2008 at 11:39 PM #284024greekfireParticipantI have been searching for answers to our current problems quite a bit in the past couple years or so. I am convinced now, more than ever, that unless we know our history we are doomed to repeat it. I used to think this was a tired cliche, but it has won me over now. Nearly all of the problems that we are facing today have been faced before in our nation’s history in one form or another. We’d be wise to study our own history better because we are well into the process of repeating it all over again.
October 8, 2008 at 11:39 PM #284048greekfireParticipantI have been searching for answers to our current problems quite a bit in the past couple years or so. I am convinced now, more than ever, that unless we know our history we are doomed to repeat it. I used to think this was a tired cliche, but it has won me over now. Nearly all of the problems that we are facing today have been faced before in our nation’s history in one form or another. We’d be wise to study our own history better because we are well into the process of repeating it all over again.
October 8, 2008 at 11:39 PM #284066greekfireParticipantI have been searching for answers to our current problems quite a bit in the past couple years or so. I am convinced now, more than ever, that unless we know our history we are doomed to repeat it. I used to think this was a tired cliche, but it has won me over now. Nearly all of the problems that we are facing today have been faced before in our nation’s history in one form or another. We’d be wise to study our own history better because we are well into the process of repeating it all over again.
October 8, 2008 at 11:39 PM #284075greekfireParticipantI have been searching for answers to our current problems quite a bit in the past couple years or so. I am convinced now, more than ever, that unless we know our history we are doomed to repeat it. I used to think this was a tired cliche, but it has won me over now. Nearly all of the problems that we are facing today have been faced before in our nation’s history in one form or another. We’d be wise to study our own history better because we are well into the process of repeating it all over again.
October 9, 2008 at 6:50 AM #283835EconProfParticipantGreekfire: your are sooo right.
And it wasn’t even very long ago. What is remarkable is how this crisis resembles the Long Term Capital Management moment of, I believe 1998. Then LTCM used extremely high leverage, a complicated and flawed economic model with innovative new tools, and even a Nobel-prize winning economist in their highest management. The whole structure was based on an assumption that success was nearly inevitable–only a 1 in 1000 probability of failure. Well, a black swan flew by, and they blew up.
I think their top guy was named Merriweather, and he recently was in control of a hedge fund that just collapsed. Basing this all on my flawed memory of news events, so if anyone can fill in the blanks please do.October 9, 2008 at 6:50 AM #284123EconProfParticipantGreekfire: your are sooo right.
And it wasn’t even very long ago. What is remarkable is how this crisis resembles the Long Term Capital Management moment of, I believe 1998. Then LTCM used extremely high leverage, a complicated and flawed economic model with innovative new tools, and even a Nobel-prize winning economist in their highest management. The whole structure was based on an assumption that success was nearly inevitable–only a 1 in 1000 probability of failure. Well, a black swan flew by, and they blew up.
I think their top guy was named Merriweather, and he recently was in control of a hedge fund that just collapsed. Basing this all on my flawed memory of news events, so if anyone can fill in the blanks please do.October 9, 2008 at 6:50 AM #284149EconProfParticipantGreekfire: your are sooo right.
And it wasn’t even very long ago. What is remarkable is how this crisis resembles the Long Term Capital Management moment of, I believe 1998. Then LTCM used extremely high leverage, a complicated and flawed economic model with innovative new tools, and even a Nobel-prize winning economist in their highest management. The whole structure was based on an assumption that success was nearly inevitable–only a 1 in 1000 probability of failure. Well, a black swan flew by, and they blew up.
I think their top guy was named Merriweather, and he recently was in control of a hedge fund that just collapsed. Basing this all on my flawed memory of news events, so if anyone can fill in the blanks please do.October 9, 2008 at 6:50 AM #284167EconProfParticipantGreekfire: your are sooo right.
And it wasn’t even very long ago. What is remarkable is how this crisis resembles the Long Term Capital Management moment of, I believe 1998. Then LTCM used extremely high leverage, a complicated and flawed economic model with innovative new tools, and even a Nobel-prize winning economist in their highest management. The whole structure was based on an assumption that success was nearly inevitable–only a 1 in 1000 probability of failure. Well, a black swan flew by, and they blew up.
I think their top guy was named Merriweather, and he recently was in control of a hedge fund that just collapsed. Basing this all on my flawed memory of news events, so if anyone can fill in the blanks please do. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.