Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › The next tipping point
- This topic has 115 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by temeculaguy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 5, 2009 at 9:32 PM #454316September 5, 2009 at 9:40 PM #453524paramountParticipant
[quote=Eugene][quote=paramount]Let’s see, the Chinese gov’t is telling their citizens to stock up on gold and silver
[/quote]Source?
[quote]The S&P is currently averaging @ 140x earnings.[/quote]
Which part of S&P? I just checked the four stocks I mentioned earlier. With the exception of AA, whose forward P/E is 26 because of low aluminum prices (something that may well change if world economy fully recovers), all others are in 11-18 range. MSFT is at 13, INTC is at 16, BA is at 11. These ratios seem perfectly reasonable to me.[/quote]
My S&P number came from here:
September 5, 2009 at 9:40 PM #453719paramountParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote=paramount]Let’s see, the Chinese gov’t is telling their citizens to stock up on gold and silver
[/quote]Source?
[quote]The S&P is currently averaging @ 140x earnings.[/quote]
Which part of S&P? I just checked the four stocks I mentioned earlier. With the exception of AA, whose forward P/E is 26 because of low aluminum prices (something that may well change if world economy fully recovers), all others are in 11-18 range. MSFT is at 13, INTC is at 16, BA is at 11. These ratios seem perfectly reasonable to me.[/quote]
My S&P number came from here:
September 5, 2009 at 9:40 PM #454057paramountParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote=paramount]Let’s see, the Chinese gov’t is telling their citizens to stock up on gold and silver
[/quote]Source?
[quote]The S&P is currently averaging @ 140x earnings.[/quote]
Which part of S&P? I just checked the four stocks I mentioned earlier. With the exception of AA, whose forward P/E is 26 because of low aluminum prices (something that may well change if world economy fully recovers), all others are in 11-18 range. MSFT is at 13, INTC is at 16, BA is at 11. These ratios seem perfectly reasonable to me.[/quote]
My S&P number came from here:
September 5, 2009 at 9:40 PM #454128paramountParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote=paramount]Let’s see, the Chinese gov’t is telling their citizens to stock up on gold and silver
[/quote]Source?
[quote]The S&P is currently averaging @ 140x earnings.[/quote]
Which part of S&P? I just checked the four stocks I mentioned earlier. With the exception of AA, whose forward P/E is 26 because of low aluminum prices (something that may well change if world economy fully recovers), all others are in 11-18 range. MSFT is at 13, INTC is at 16, BA is at 11. These ratios seem perfectly reasonable to me.[/quote]
My S&P number came from here:
September 5, 2009 at 9:40 PM #454321paramountParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote=paramount]Let’s see, the Chinese gov’t is telling their citizens to stock up on gold and silver
[/quote]Source?
[quote]The S&P is currently averaging @ 140x earnings.[/quote]
Which part of S&P? I just checked the four stocks I mentioned earlier. With the exception of AA, whose forward P/E is 26 because of low aluminum prices (something that may well change if world economy fully recovers), all others are in 11-18 range. MSFT is at 13, INTC is at 16, BA is at 11. These ratios seem perfectly reasonable to me.[/quote]
My S&P number came from here:
September 5, 2009 at 10:11 PM #453529EugeneParticipant[quote=paramount]
My S&P number came from here:http://chartoftheday.com/20090821.htm?T%5B/quote%5D
That seems to be the ratio of S&P market cap to cumulative annualized Q2 earnings. Not a very reliable measure.
To illustrate. Suppose there are two companies, Boeing and Citi. Boeing reports quarterly annualized profit of $10 bil. Citi reports quarterly annualized loss of $10 bil. What would be the appropriate market cap, and the appropriate index value, given these earnings?
The correct answer is 0 and 0…
September 5, 2009 at 10:11 PM #453724EugeneParticipant[quote=paramount]
My S&P number came from here:http://chartoftheday.com/20090821.htm?T%5B/quote%5D
That seems to be the ratio of S&P market cap to cumulative annualized Q2 earnings. Not a very reliable measure.
To illustrate. Suppose there are two companies, Boeing and Citi. Boeing reports quarterly annualized profit of $10 bil. Citi reports quarterly annualized loss of $10 bil. What would be the appropriate market cap, and the appropriate index value, given these earnings?
The correct answer is 0 and 0…
September 5, 2009 at 10:11 PM #454062EugeneParticipant[quote=paramount]
My S&P number came from here:http://chartoftheday.com/20090821.htm?T%5B/quote%5D
That seems to be the ratio of S&P market cap to cumulative annualized Q2 earnings. Not a very reliable measure.
To illustrate. Suppose there are two companies, Boeing and Citi. Boeing reports quarterly annualized profit of $10 bil. Citi reports quarterly annualized loss of $10 bil. What would be the appropriate market cap, and the appropriate index value, given these earnings?
The correct answer is 0 and 0…
September 5, 2009 at 10:11 PM #454133EugeneParticipant[quote=paramount]
My S&P number came from here:http://chartoftheday.com/20090821.htm?T%5B/quote%5D
That seems to be the ratio of S&P market cap to cumulative annualized Q2 earnings. Not a very reliable measure.
To illustrate. Suppose there are two companies, Boeing and Citi. Boeing reports quarterly annualized profit of $10 bil. Citi reports quarterly annualized loss of $10 bil. What would be the appropriate market cap, and the appropriate index value, given these earnings?
The correct answer is 0 and 0…
September 5, 2009 at 10:11 PM #454326EugeneParticipant[quote=paramount]
My S&P number came from here:http://chartoftheday.com/20090821.htm?T%5B/quote%5D
That seems to be the ratio of S&P market cap to cumulative annualized Q2 earnings. Not a very reliable measure.
To illustrate. Suppose there are two companies, Boeing and Citi. Boeing reports quarterly annualized profit of $10 bil. Citi reports quarterly annualized loss of $10 bil. What would be the appropriate market cap, and the appropriate index value, given these earnings?
The correct answer is 0 and 0…
September 5, 2009 at 10:14 PM #453534temeculaguyParticipantchat of the day wants a credit card number and money to see where they get their info or to read anything other than two paragraphs. That alone disqualifies them as a valid source of info. If i have to break out a credit card to view something on the internet, somebody better be naked.
September 5, 2009 at 10:14 PM #453729temeculaguyParticipantchat of the day wants a credit card number and money to see where they get their info or to read anything other than two paragraphs. That alone disqualifies them as a valid source of info. If i have to break out a credit card to view something on the internet, somebody better be naked.
September 5, 2009 at 10:14 PM #454067temeculaguyParticipantchat of the day wants a credit card number and money to see where they get their info or to read anything other than two paragraphs. That alone disqualifies them as a valid source of info. If i have to break out a credit card to view something on the internet, somebody better be naked.
September 5, 2009 at 10:14 PM #454138temeculaguyParticipantchat of the day wants a credit card number and money to see where they get their info or to read anything other than two paragraphs. That alone disqualifies them as a valid source of info. If i have to break out a credit card to view something on the internet, somebody better be naked.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.