The new smart financial move is walking away

[scaredyclassic]

i am the boss of my dog however. she is very well behaved. also, the children obey. more or less.

[sdrealtor]

Nice try on the BB analogy but of course off base. You make sweeping generalities as though they were cold hard facts. I agree with alot of what you post but also disagree with alot. Every situation, every RE transaction and every person is different. Generalities work less in RE than just about anything i can think of.

[sdrealtor]

Nice try on the BB analogy but of course off base. You make sweeping generalities as though they were cold hard facts. I agree with alot of what you post but also disagree with alot. Every situation, every RE transaction and every person is different. Generalities work less in RE than just about anything i can think of.

[sdrealtor]

Nice try on the BB analogy but of course off base. You make sweeping generalities as though they were cold hard facts. I agree with alot of what you post but also disagree with alot. Every situation, every RE transaction and every person is different. Generalities work less in RE than just about anything i can think of.

[sdrealtor]

Nice try on the BB analogy but of course off base. You make sweeping generalities as though they were cold hard facts. I agree with alot of what you post but also disagree with alot. Every situation, every RE transaction and every person is different. Generalities work less in RE than just about anything i can think of.

[sdrealtor]

Nice try on the BB analogy but of course off base. You make sweeping generalities as though they were cold hard facts. I agree with alot of what you post but also disagree with alot. Every situation, every RE transaction and every person is different. Generalities work less in RE than just about anything i can think of.

[jpinpb]

I can understand compromising on things, such as one night pizza and one night tacos. Taking turns picking which movie to see. Maybe compromise on vacation locations, taking turns picking where to go, etc.

Having children should be mutual agreement. Compromising w/regard to having children doesn’t strike me as beneficial. We’re not talking getting dogs or cats. We’re talking life-changing decisions. Usually compromising, to me, is mutual concessions. If one agrees to have a child where is the concession on the other side?

[jpinpb]

I can understand compromising on things, such as one night pizza and one night tacos. Taking turns picking which movie to see. Maybe compromise on vacation locations, taking turns picking where to go, etc.

Having children should be mutual agreement. Compromising w/regard to having children doesn’t strike me as beneficial. We’re not talking getting dogs or cats. We’re talking life-changing decisions. Usually compromising, to me, is mutual concessions. If one agrees to have a child where is the concession on the other side?

[jpinpb]

I can understand compromising on things, such as one night pizza and one night tacos. Taking turns picking which movie to see. Maybe compromise on vacation locations, taking turns picking where to go, etc.

Having children should be mutual agreement. Compromising w/regard to having children doesn’t strike me as beneficial. We’re not talking getting dogs or cats. We’re talking life-changing decisions. Usually compromising, to me, is mutual concessions. If one agrees to have a child where is the concession on the other side?

[jpinpb]

I can understand compromising on things, such as one night pizza and one night tacos. Taking turns picking which movie to see. Maybe compromise on vacation locations, taking turns picking where to go, etc.

Having children should be mutual agreement. Compromising w/regard to having children doesn’t strike me as beneficial. We’re not talking getting dogs or cats. We’re talking life-changing decisions. Usually compromising, to me, is mutual concessions. If one agrees to have a child where is the concession on the other side?

[jpinpb]

I can understand compromising on things, such as one night pizza and one night tacos. Taking turns picking which movie to see. Maybe compromise on vacation locations, taking turns picking where to go, etc.

Having children should be mutual agreement. Compromising w/regard to having children doesn’t strike me as beneficial. We’re not talking getting dogs or cats. We’re talking life-changing decisions. Usually compromising, to me, is mutual concessions. If one agrees to have a child where is the concession on the other side?

[scaredyclassic]

perhaps. perhaps i just need a new accountant. whata botut hat cliche about ina marriage, each side gives 100%? I always felt that cliche was dub? how can each side give everything? I still think it’s dumb, but it may be true on some level. if one side says no to the last kid, then that side is deciding, and ther eis no actual compromise, because no actual compromise is possible. it’s a binary decision — yes/no. Why should there necessarily have to be two affirmatives? How is that giving 100% On the other hand, I don’t think I beleive the majority of what i’m wriitng. But I feel it.

[scaredyclassic]

perhaps. perhaps i just need a new accountant. whata botut hat cliche about ina marriage, each side gives 100%? I always felt that cliche was dub? how can each side give everything? I still think it’s dumb, but it may be true on some level. if one side says no to the last kid, then that side is deciding, and ther eis no actual compromise, because no actual compromise is possible. it’s a binary decision — yes/no. Why should there necessarily have to be two affirmatives? How is that giving 100% On the other hand, I don’t think I beleive the majority of what i’m wriitng. But I feel it.

[scaredyclassic]

perhaps. perhaps i just need a new accountant. whata botut hat cliche about ina marriage, each side gives 100%? I always felt that cliche was dub? how can each side give everything? I still think it’s dumb, but it may be true on some level. if one side says no to the last kid, then that side is deciding, and ther eis no actual compromise, because no actual compromise is possible. it’s a binary decision — yes/no. Why should there necessarily have to be two affirmatives? How is that giving 100% On the other hand, I don’t think I beleive the majority of what i’m wriitng. But I feel it.

[scaredyclassic]

perhaps. perhaps i just need a new accountant. whata botut hat cliche about ina marriage, each side gives 100%? I always felt that cliche was dub? how can each side give everything? I still think it’s dumb, but it may be true on some level. if one side says no to the last kid, then that side is deciding, and ther eis no actual compromise, because no actual compromise is possible. it’s a binary decision — yes/no. Why should there necessarily have to be two affirmatives? How is that giving 100% On the other hand, I don’t think I beleive the majority of what i’m wriitng. But I feel it.

[Author]

Posts