The Indymac Slap in our Face

[outtamojo]

[quote=GovernmentSachs][quote=davelj]
Here are my questions:
(1) Why do you care about how OneWest deals with their (deadbeat) borrowers (as you have nothing to do with either)?
(2) Why do you care about how an agreement between OneWest and the FDIC is administered (as you have nothing to do with either)?

Frankly, I don’t care if OneWest makes $10 billion or not one red cent. And if ANYONE should care, it should be me, as I’m actually in the banking industry! After all, it’s banks that I either have an ownership stake in or consult with that will be paying for the net losses here. And I simply don’t care because life is too short.[/quote]

If the FDIC is involved, every taxpayer should care about what’s going on as it’s a government corporation which is backed up by the taxpayer.

If banksters could actually do their jobs without looting the taxpayers at every turn, people wouldn’t give a shit about them. Unfortunately, criminal banksters make it a habit to steal from the taxpayer at every opportunity.

The way I see it, banksters are experts at bankstering and Hitler was an expert at exterminating Jews. In both cases, it worked out best for society when outside parties got involved. The more heavy-handed the involvement, the better in my opinion.[/quote]

http://piggington.com/beginning_with_hitler

[davelj]

[quote=GovernmentSachs]Who gives a shit if Arraya is right on all the little details or not?

[snip]

I personally could give a rat’s if Arraya or Zero Hedge or anyone that criticizes banks is ‘right.

[snip]

If that Youtube video turns out to be 100% wrong, I could care less so long as it incited more people to email and call their representatives and let them know that they better stick it to the banks any way they can or risk getting voted out of office.

[/quote]

It’s a little bit difficult to have an intelligent discussion about an issue if one party doesn’t care about whether the sub-set of “details” is right or wrong. Also, I guess I should point out that if you don’t get the details “right,” then there’s a reasonable chance you’re not going to get the big picture right either.

I will agree that the Banksters have done a lot of damage to our economy and should be held accountable… but it doesn’t help the cause to put out incorrect and misleading information that can be easily refuted, because it makes those on the anti-bankster side look silly and desperate, which in turn HELPS the Banksters cause.

We have enough problems that were caused by these clowns that can be DOCUMENTED and are TRUE that there’s no need to invent red herrings. It’s a waste of time and effort, and it’s counterproductive.

A Bankster would point to your post and say, “Look, my good people, there are certain people [GovernmentSachs] who don’t even CARE about the truth! They simply want to persecute!” As such, folks like you are part of the problem.

[davelj]

[quote=GovernmentSachs]Who gives a shit if Arraya is right on all the little details or not?

[snip]

I personally could give a rat’s if Arraya or Zero Hedge or anyone that criticizes banks is ‘right.

[snip]

If that Youtube video turns out to be 100% wrong, I could care less so long as it incited more people to email and call their representatives and let them know that they better stick it to the banks any way they can or risk getting voted out of office.

[/quote]

It’s a little bit difficult to have an intelligent discussion about an issue if one party doesn’t care about whether the sub-set of “details” is right or wrong. Also, I guess I should point out that if you don’t get the details “right,” then there’s a reasonable chance you’re not going to get the big picture right either.

I will agree that the Banksters have done a lot of damage to our economy and should be held accountable… but it doesn’t help the cause to put out incorrect and misleading information that can be easily refuted, because it makes those on the anti-bankster side look silly and desperate, which in turn HELPS the Banksters cause.

We have enough problems that were caused by these clowns that can be DOCUMENTED and are TRUE that there’s no need to invent red herrings. It’s a waste of time and effort, and it’s counterproductive.

A Bankster would point to your post and say, “Look, my good people, there are certain people [GovernmentSachs] who don’t even CARE about the truth! They simply want to persecute!” As such, folks like you are part of the problem.

[davelj]

[quote=GovernmentSachs]Who gives a shit if Arraya is right on all the little details or not?

[snip]

I personally could give a rat’s if Arraya or Zero Hedge or anyone that criticizes banks is ‘right.

[snip]

If that Youtube video turns out to be 100% wrong, I could care less so long as it incited more people to email and call their representatives and let them know that they better stick it to the banks any way they can or risk getting voted out of office.

[/quote]

It’s a little bit difficult to have an intelligent discussion about an issue if one party doesn’t care about whether the sub-set of “details” is right or wrong. Also, I guess I should point out that if you don’t get the details “right,” then there’s a reasonable chance you’re not going to get the big picture right either.

I will agree that the Banksters have done a lot of damage to our economy and should be held accountable… but it doesn’t help the cause to put out incorrect and misleading information that can be easily refuted, because it makes those on the anti-bankster side look silly and desperate, which in turn HELPS the Banksters cause.

We have enough problems that were caused by these clowns that can be DOCUMENTED and are TRUE that there’s no need to invent red herrings. It’s a waste of time and effort, and it’s counterproductive.

A Bankster would point to your post and say, “Look, my good people, there are certain people [GovernmentSachs] who don’t even CARE about the truth! They simply want to persecute!” As such, folks like you are part of the problem.

[davelj]

[quote=GovernmentSachs]Who gives a shit if Arraya is right on all the little details or not?

[snip]

I personally could give a rat’s if Arraya or Zero Hedge or anyone that criticizes banks is ‘right.

[snip]

If that Youtube video turns out to be 100% wrong, I could care less so long as it incited more people to email and call their representatives and let them know that they better stick it to the banks any way they can or risk getting voted out of office.

[/quote]

It’s a little bit difficult to have an intelligent discussion about an issue if one party doesn’t care about whether the sub-set of “details” is right or wrong. Also, I guess I should point out that if you don’t get the details “right,” then there’s a reasonable chance you’re not going to get the big picture right either.

I will agree that the Banksters have done a lot of damage to our economy and should be held accountable… but it doesn’t help the cause to put out incorrect and misleading information that can be easily refuted, because it makes those on the anti-bankster side look silly and desperate, which in turn HELPS the Banksters cause.

We have enough problems that were caused by these clowns that can be DOCUMENTED and are TRUE that there’s no need to invent red herrings. It’s a waste of time and effort, and it’s counterproductive.

A Bankster would point to your post and say, “Look, my good people, there are certain people [GovernmentSachs] who don’t even CARE about the truth! They simply want to persecute!” As such, folks like you are part of the problem.

[davelj]

[quote=GovernmentSachs]Who gives a shit if Arraya is right on all the little details or not?

[snip]

I personally could give a rat’s if Arraya or Zero Hedge or anyone that criticizes banks is ‘right.

[snip]

If that Youtube video turns out to be 100% wrong, I could care less so long as it incited more people to email and call their representatives and let them know that they better stick it to the banks any way they can or risk getting voted out of office.

[/quote]

It’s a little bit difficult to have an intelligent discussion about an issue if one party doesn’t care about whether the sub-set of “details” is right or wrong. Also, I guess I should point out that if you don’t get the details “right,” then there’s a reasonable chance you’re not going to get the big picture right either.

I will agree that the Banksters have done a lot of damage to our economy and should be held accountable… but it doesn’t help the cause to put out incorrect and misleading information that can be easily refuted, because it makes those on the anti-bankster side look silly and desperate, which in turn HELPS the Banksters cause.

We have enough problems that were caused by these clowns that can be DOCUMENTED and are TRUE that there’s no need to invent red herrings. It’s a waste of time and effort, and it’s counterproductive.

A Bankster would point to your post and say, “Look, my good people, there are certain people [GovernmentSachs] who don’t even CARE about the truth! They simply want to persecute!” As such, folks like you are part of the problem.

[Author]

Posts