- This topic has 118 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 2, 2008 at 5:51 PM #12335April 2, 2008 at 6:41 PM #179902tcParticipant
How long will it take for this to take effect? And what properties are local governments going to buy? Seems to me its just one more way to keep costs high. Its all just a joke on us. Free market my ass. Work more, earn more, and spend more so that you have to work more. Are we all really that stupid.
Sorry it just makes me sick.April 2, 2008 at 6:41 PM #180269tcParticipantHow long will it take for this to take effect? And what properties are local governments going to buy? Seems to me its just one more way to keep costs high. Its all just a joke on us. Free market my ass. Work more, earn more, and spend more so that you have to work more. Are we all really that stupid.
Sorry it just makes me sick.April 2, 2008 at 6:41 PM #180273tcParticipantHow long will it take for this to take effect? And what properties are local governments going to buy? Seems to me its just one more way to keep costs high. Its all just a joke on us. Free market my ass. Work more, earn more, and spend more so that you have to work more. Are we all really that stupid.
Sorry it just makes me sick.April 2, 2008 at 6:41 PM #180287tcParticipantHow long will it take for this to take effect? And what properties are local governments going to buy? Seems to me its just one more way to keep costs high. Its all just a joke on us. Free market my ass. Work more, earn more, and spend more so that you have to work more. Are we all really that stupid.
Sorry it just makes me sick.April 2, 2008 at 6:41 PM #180363tcParticipantHow long will it take for this to take effect? And what properties are local governments going to buy? Seems to me its just one more way to keep costs high. Its all just a joke on us. Free market my ass. Work more, earn more, and spend more so that you have to work more. Are we all really that stupid.
Sorry it just makes me sick.April 2, 2008 at 7:21 PM #179912AecetiaParticipantAccording to the article: “The outlines of the bill suggested that the two sides had succeeded, at least for the moment, in maintaining a spirit of bipartisan collaboration. Republicans had sought a larger tax credit, of $15,000 to be credited over three years, for buyers of foreclosed properties but were apparently willing to settle for a $5000, single-year credit.”
I would imagine that this tax credit would only cover SFR and not investment type rentals or vacation homes. As for the millions for counseling, what is the point? Another case of the government wasting tax payer money!
April 2, 2008 at 7:21 PM #180279AecetiaParticipantAccording to the article: “The outlines of the bill suggested that the two sides had succeeded, at least for the moment, in maintaining a spirit of bipartisan collaboration. Republicans had sought a larger tax credit, of $15,000 to be credited over three years, for buyers of foreclosed properties but were apparently willing to settle for a $5000, single-year credit.”
I would imagine that this tax credit would only cover SFR and not investment type rentals or vacation homes. As for the millions for counseling, what is the point? Another case of the government wasting tax payer money!
April 2, 2008 at 7:21 PM #180283AecetiaParticipantAccording to the article: “The outlines of the bill suggested that the two sides had succeeded, at least for the moment, in maintaining a spirit of bipartisan collaboration. Republicans had sought a larger tax credit, of $15,000 to be credited over three years, for buyers of foreclosed properties but were apparently willing to settle for a $5000, single-year credit.”
I would imagine that this tax credit would only cover SFR and not investment type rentals or vacation homes. As for the millions for counseling, what is the point? Another case of the government wasting tax payer money!
April 2, 2008 at 7:21 PM #180296AecetiaParticipantAccording to the article: “The outlines of the bill suggested that the two sides had succeeded, at least for the moment, in maintaining a spirit of bipartisan collaboration. Republicans had sought a larger tax credit, of $15,000 to be credited over three years, for buyers of foreclosed properties but were apparently willing to settle for a $5000, single-year credit.”
I would imagine that this tax credit would only cover SFR and not investment type rentals or vacation homes. As for the millions for counseling, what is the point? Another case of the government wasting tax payer money!
April 2, 2008 at 7:21 PM #180371AecetiaParticipantAccording to the article: “The outlines of the bill suggested that the two sides had succeeded, at least for the moment, in maintaining a spirit of bipartisan collaboration. Republicans had sought a larger tax credit, of $15,000 to be credited over three years, for buyers of foreclosed properties but were apparently willing to settle for a $5000, single-year credit.”
I would imagine that this tax credit would only cover SFR and not investment type rentals or vacation homes. As for the millions for counseling, what is the point? Another case of the government wasting tax payer money!
April 2, 2008 at 7:46 PM #179932tcParticipantI might be confused but didn’t Ron Paul say 19% of our taxes goes to paying interest. And Bernanke replied that they had already done the math for 100% of governement spending going toward repayment of interest. Why would they be trying to figure out just how much they can bleed the people? Why can’t we all just live within our means? The people of this country are being brainwashed into thinking material possesion equals happiness.
April 2, 2008 at 7:46 PM #180299tcParticipantI might be confused but didn’t Ron Paul say 19% of our taxes goes to paying interest. And Bernanke replied that they had already done the math for 100% of governement spending going toward repayment of interest. Why would they be trying to figure out just how much they can bleed the people? Why can’t we all just live within our means? The people of this country are being brainwashed into thinking material possesion equals happiness.
April 2, 2008 at 7:46 PM #180303tcParticipantI might be confused but didn’t Ron Paul say 19% of our taxes goes to paying interest. And Bernanke replied that they had already done the math for 100% of governement spending going toward repayment of interest. Why would they be trying to figure out just how much they can bleed the people? Why can’t we all just live within our means? The people of this country are being brainwashed into thinking material possesion equals happiness.
April 2, 2008 at 7:46 PM #180317tcParticipantI might be confused but didn’t Ron Paul say 19% of our taxes goes to paying interest. And Bernanke replied that they had already done the math for 100% of governement spending going toward repayment of interest. Why would they be trying to figure out just how much they can bleed the people? Why can’t we all just live within our means? The people of this country are being brainwashed into thinking material possesion equals happiness.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.