- This topic has 450 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by FormerOwner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 27, 2008 at 6:17 AM #229452June 27, 2008 at 2:51 PM #229581AnonymousGuest
There’s no way Temecula can be compared to Valencia or anywhere in coastal San Diego county. For the future of Temecula think Palmdale, Victorville, or Stockton. To hell with the zoning, all those foreclosures are going to be tomorrow’s meth labs.
June 27, 2008 at 2:51 PM #229701AnonymousGuestThere’s no way Temecula can be compared to Valencia or anywhere in coastal San Diego county. For the future of Temecula think Palmdale, Victorville, or Stockton. To hell with the zoning, all those foreclosures are going to be tomorrow’s meth labs.
June 27, 2008 at 2:51 PM #229709AnonymousGuestThere’s no way Temecula can be compared to Valencia or anywhere in coastal San Diego county. For the future of Temecula think Palmdale, Victorville, or Stockton. To hell with the zoning, all those foreclosures are going to be tomorrow’s meth labs.
June 27, 2008 at 2:51 PM #229742AnonymousGuestThere’s no way Temecula can be compared to Valencia or anywhere in coastal San Diego county. For the future of Temecula think Palmdale, Victorville, or Stockton. To hell with the zoning, all those foreclosures are going to be tomorrow’s meth labs.
June 27, 2008 at 2:51 PM #229759AnonymousGuestThere’s no way Temecula can be compared to Valencia or anywhere in coastal San Diego county. For the future of Temecula think Palmdale, Victorville, or Stockton. To hell with the zoning, all those foreclosures are going to be tomorrow’s meth labs.
June 27, 2008 at 3:28 PM #229611kewpParticipantWell, if it ain’t po’ folk gonna live in those empty houses, who is it then?
I’ve seen it happen before. Where I grew up, Plainfield NJ, was all gorgeous colonial homes from the turn of the century. I would be afraid to walk around my old neighborhood during the daylight now. Many of the homes are even burned out/gutted and its not even economical to tear them down, let alone replace them.
I wish I could find the article, the point was that the ghetto city dwellings would gentrify to the point that it was unaffordable for typical ghetto-dwellers, whom would then flee to the suburbs.
June 27, 2008 at 3:28 PM #229730kewpParticipantWell, if it ain’t po’ folk gonna live in those empty houses, who is it then?
I’ve seen it happen before. Where I grew up, Plainfield NJ, was all gorgeous colonial homes from the turn of the century. I would be afraid to walk around my old neighborhood during the daylight now. Many of the homes are even burned out/gutted and its not even economical to tear them down, let alone replace them.
I wish I could find the article, the point was that the ghetto city dwellings would gentrify to the point that it was unaffordable for typical ghetto-dwellers, whom would then flee to the suburbs.
June 27, 2008 at 3:28 PM #229739kewpParticipantWell, if it ain’t po’ folk gonna live in those empty houses, who is it then?
I’ve seen it happen before. Where I grew up, Plainfield NJ, was all gorgeous colonial homes from the turn of the century. I would be afraid to walk around my old neighborhood during the daylight now. Many of the homes are even burned out/gutted and its not even economical to tear them down, let alone replace them.
I wish I could find the article, the point was that the ghetto city dwellings would gentrify to the point that it was unaffordable for typical ghetto-dwellers, whom would then flee to the suburbs.
June 27, 2008 at 3:28 PM #229773kewpParticipantWell, if it ain’t po’ folk gonna live in those empty houses, who is it then?
I’ve seen it happen before. Where I grew up, Plainfield NJ, was all gorgeous colonial homes from the turn of the century. I would be afraid to walk around my old neighborhood during the daylight now. Many of the homes are even burned out/gutted and its not even economical to tear them down, let alone replace them.
I wish I could find the article, the point was that the ghetto city dwellings would gentrify to the point that it was unaffordable for typical ghetto-dwellers, whom would then flee to the suburbs.
June 27, 2008 at 3:28 PM #229788kewpParticipantWell, if it ain’t po’ folk gonna live in those empty houses, who is it then?
I’ve seen it happen before. Where I grew up, Plainfield NJ, was all gorgeous colonial homes from the turn of the century. I would be afraid to walk around my old neighborhood during the daylight now. Many of the homes are even burned out/gutted and its not even economical to tear them down, let alone replace them.
I wish I could find the article, the point was that the ghetto city dwellings would gentrify to the point that it was unaffordable for typical ghetto-dwellers, whom would then flee to the suburbs.
June 27, 2008 at 3:47 PM #229621RenParticipanthttp://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/06/16/suburb.city/index.html?ref=patrick.net
There you go. It’s pure speculation based on some university professor’s (wrong) assumption that the majority of people who can afford it now suddenly want to live downtown. I don’t, nobody I know does, and most of the posters I’ve seen on this board focus on the suburbs as well.
June 27, 2008 at 3:47 PM #229740RenParticipanthttp://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/06/16/suburb.city/index.html?ref=patrick.net
There you go. It’s pure speculation based on some university professor’s (wrong) assumption that the majority of people who can afford it now suddenly want to live downtown. I don’t, nobody I know does, and most of the posters I’ve seen on this board focus on the suburbs as well.
June 27, 2008 at 3:47 PM #229748RenParticipanthttp://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/06/16/suburb.city/index.html?ref=patrick.net
There you go. It’s pure speculation based on some university professor’s (wrong) assumption that the majority of people who can afford it now suddenly want to live downtown. I don’t, nobody I know does, and most of the posters I’ve seen on this board focus on the suburbs as well.
June 27, 2008 at 3:47 PM #229783RenParticipanthttp://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/06/16/suburb.city/index.html?ref=patrick.net
There you go. It’s pure speculation based on some university professor’s (wrong) assumption that the majority of people who can afford it now suddenly want to live downtown. I don’t, nobody I know does, and most of the posters I’ve seen on this board focus on the suburbs as well.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.