- This topic has 125 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 12, 2010 at 8:22 PM #17690July 12, 2010 at 9:06 PM #577196jpinpbParticipant
I guess now that the tax credits expired, we needed something to keep this ball rolling. Everyone on board for the continuation of the crazy train ride.
July 12, 2010 at 9:06 PM #577290jpinpbParticipantI guess now that the tax credits expired, we needed something to keep this ball rolling. Everyone on board for the continuation of the crazy train ride.
July 12, 2010 at 9:06 PM #577817jpinpbParticipantI guess now that the tax credits expired, we needed something to keep this ball rolling. Everyone on board for the continuation of the crazy train ride.
July 12, 2010 at 9:06 PM #577924jpinpbParticipantI guess now that the tax credits expired, we needed something to keep this ball rolling. Everyone on board for the continuation of the crazy train ride.
July 12, 2010 at 9:06 PM #578224jpinpbParticipantI guess now that the tax credits expired, we needed something to keep this ball rolling. Everyone on board for the continuation of the crazy train ride.
July 12, 2010 at 9:42 PM #577221scaredyclassicParticipantbetter for future defaulters…?
July 12, 2010 at 9:42 PM #577315scaredyclassicParticipantbetter for future defaulters…?
July 12, 2010 at 9:42 PM #577842scaredyclassicParticipantbetter for future defaulters…?
July 12, 2010 at 9:42 PM #577949scaredyclassicParticipantbetter for future defaulters…?
July 12, 2010 at 9:42 PM #578249scaredyclassicParticipantbetter for future defaulters…?
July 13, 2010 at 8:25 AM #577291(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThese loans, although scarce, never really went away. I suspect that the underwriting on them is pretty tight (e.g. 75% LTV or better, sufficient assets, and full documentation). These are not bad products for those who have sufficient assets (e.g. could pay off the loan at any time by liquidating accounts).
The real problem with these previously was that they were used with stated income and stated asset loans. These are not good products for those without sufficient assets to pay off a significant chunk of the loan.
July 13, 2010 at 8:25 AM #577385(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThese loans, although scarce, never really went away. I suspect that the underwriting on them is pretty tight (e.g. 75% LTV or better, sufficient assets, and full documentation). These are not bad products for those who have sufficient assets (e.g. could pay off the loan at any time by liquidating accounts).
The real problem with these previously was that they were used with stated income and stated asset loans. These are not good products for those without sufficient assets to pay off a significant chunk of the loan.
July 13, 2010 at 8:25 AM #577912(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThese loans, although scarce, never really went away. I suspect that the underwriting on them is pretty tight (e.g. 75% LTV or better, sufficient assets, and full documentation). These are not bad products for those who have sufficient assets (e.g. could pay off the loan at any time by liquidating accounts).
The real problem with these previously was that they were used with stated income and stated asset loans. These are not good products for those without sufficient assets to pay off a significant chunk of the loan.
July 13, 2010 at 8:25 AM #578018(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThese loans, although scarce, never really went away. I suspect that the underwriting on them is pretty tight (e.g. 75% LTV or better, sufficient assets, and full documentation). These are not bad products for those who have sufficient assets (e.g. could pay off the loan at any time by liquidating accounts).
The real problem with these previously was that they were used with stated income and stated asset loans. These are not good products for those without sufficient assets to pay off a significant chunk of the loan.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.