- This topic has 1,215 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 9, 2009 at 4:29 PM #480325November 9, 2009 at 4:42 PM #479496
briansd1
GuestWell said, Eugene.
That’s why the military is circumspect about this. They need to make sure they have all the facts first. There is no need to speculate and fuel the fire.
The military cannot afford a backlash against Muslims within its own ranks. It needs Muslim servicemen to translate and advise in the two wars.
It’s only matter of time before a White Christian man goes berserk and shoots on a military base. Shootings happened at schools, post office, the work place, etc… That just part of life with guns.
Don’t blame Obama, there are plenty of Republicans in the military and that’s their “baby” .
November 9, 2009 at 4:42 PM #479666briansd1
GuestWell said, Eugene.
That’s why the military is circumspect about this. They need to make sure they have all the facts first. There is no need to speculate and fuel the fire.
The military cannot afford a backlash against Muslims within its own ranks. It needs Muslim servicemen to translate and advise in the two wars.
It’s only matter of time before a White Christian man goes berserk and shoots on a military base. Shootings happened at schools, post office, the work place, etc… That just part of life with guns.
Don’t blame Obama, there are plenty of Republicans in the military and that’s their “baby” .
November 9, 2009 at 4:42 PM #480029briansd1
GuestWell said, Eugene.
That’s why the military is circumspect about this. They need to make sure they have all the facts first. There is no need to speculate and fuel the fire.
The military cannot afford a backlash against Muslims within its own ranks. It needs Muslim servicemen to translate and advise in the two wars.
It’s only matter of time before a White Christian man goes berserk and shoots on a military base. Shootings happened at schools, post office, the work place, etc… That just part of life with guns.
Don’t blame Obama, there are plenty of Republicans in the military and that’s their “baby” .
November 9, 2009 at 4:42 PM #480109briansd1
GuestWell said, Eugene.
That’s why the military is circumspect about this. They need to make sure they have all the facts first. There is no need to speculate and fuel the fire.
The military cannot afford a backlash against Muslims within its own ranks. It needs Muslim servicemen to translate and advise in the two wars.
It’s only matter of time before a White Christian man goes berserk and shoots on a military base. Shootings happened at schools, post office, the work place, etc… That just part of life with guns.
Don’t blame Obama, there are plenty of Republicans in the military and that’s their “baby” .
November 9, 2009 at 4:42 PM #480330briansd1
GuestWell said, Eugene.
That’s why the military is circumspect about this. They need to make sure they have all the facts first. There is no need to speculate and fuel the fire.
The military cannot afford a backlash against Muslims within its own ranks. It needs Muslim servicemen to translate and advise in the two wars.
It’s only matter of time before a White Christian man goes berserk and shoots on a military base. Shootings happened at schools, post office, the work place, etc… That just part of life with guns.
Don’t blame Obama, there are plenty of Republicans in the military and that’s their “baby” .
November 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM #479501Aecetia
ParticipantI will be surprised if he is legally executed.
November 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM #479671Aecetia
ParticipantI will be surprised if he is legally executed.
November 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM #480034Aecetia
ParticipantI will be surprised if he is legally executed.
November 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM #480114Aecetia
ParticipantI will be surprised if he is legally executed.
November 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM #480334Aecetia
ParticipantI will be surprised if he is legally executed.
November 9, 2009 at 4:51 PM #479506Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=Eugene]Is there a line between a nut case and a terrorist?
Did anyone call the guy who shot up Virginia Tech a terrorist? After all, he killed more people than the guy at Fort Hood.
Is it automatically an act of terror whenever a Muslim kills someone on U.S. soil?[/quote]
Eugene: When the shooter in question was attempting contact with al-Qaeda, had advocated and agitated for Muslims the world over to fight the “aggressors” (read Americans) and is screaming “Allahu Akbar” as he shoots defenseless US soldiers; yeah, I’m going to go with him being a terrorist.
The VT shooter was a mentally disturbed young man.
Very big difference and one that should be immediately obvious to anyone with the requisite capacity to reason. Unbelievable.
November 9, 2009 at 4:51 PM #479676Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=Eugene]Is there a line between a nut case and a terrorist?
Did anyone call the guy who shot up Virginia Tech a terrorist? After all, he killed more people than the guy at Fort Hood.
Is it automatically an act of terror whenever a Muslim kills someone on U.S. soil?[/quote]
Eugene: When the shooter in question was attempting contact with al-Qaeda, had advocated and agitated for Muslims the world over to fight the “aggressors” (read Americans) and is screaming “Allahu Akbar” as he shoots defenseless US soldiers; yeah, I’m going to go with him being a terrorist.
The VT shooter was a mentally disturbed young man.
Very big difference and one that should be immediately obvious to anyone with the requisite capacity to reason. Unbelievable.
November 9, 2009 at 4:51 PM #480039Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=Eugene]Is there a line between a nut case and a terrorist?
Did anyone call the guy who shot up Virginia Tech a terrorist? After all, he killed more people than the guy at Fort Hood.
Is it automatically an act of terror whenever a Muslim kills someone on U.S. soil?[/quote]
Eugene: When the shooter in question was attempting contact with al-Qaeda, had advocated and agitated for Muslims the world over to fight the “aggressors” (read Americans) and is screaming “Allahu Akbar” as he shoots defenseless US soldiers; yeah, I’m going to go with him being a terrorist.
The VT shooter was a mentally disturbed young man.
Very big difference and one that should be immediately obvious to anyone with the requisite capacity to reason. Unbelievable.
November 9, 2009 at 4:51 PM #480119Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=Eugene]Is there a line between a nut case and a terrorist?
Did anyone call the guy who shot up Virginia Tech a terrorist? After all, he killed more people than the guy at Fort Hood.
Is it automatically an act of terror whenever a Muslim kills someone on U.S. soil?[/quote]
Eugene: When the shooter in question was attempting contact with al-Qaeda, had advocated and agitated for Muslims the world over to fight the “aggressors” (read Americans) and is screaming “Allahu Akbar” as he shoots defenseless US soldiers; yeah, I’m going to go with him being a terrorist.
The VT shooter was a mentally disturbed young man.
Very big difference and one that should be immediately obvious to anyone with the requisite capacity to reason. Unbelievable.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.