- This topic has 530 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 9, 2010 at 12:17 PM #549397May 9, 2010 at 2:11 PM #548478
eavesdropper
Participant[quote=NewtoSanDiego]Another liberal Republican….Robert Bennett of Utah defeated.
We control the party now….Any questions[/quote]
Yes, I have a couple. Who’s “we”, and what is the “party” of which you speak?
Oh, and a third question: Your post that generated this thread reads “The following is the official Tea Party economic manifesto.” Which is the “official” tea party? My research turns up a multitude of groups, with differing philosopies and goals. I was not able to find your manifesto on any of them. Can you provide some additional info?
In light of recent exchanges with you, please consider what you factually KNOW about me before jumping to conclusions in your response. You obviously care a great deal about your political views, and, therefore, should have no reluctance or problem in defending them. However, name-calling and groundless presumptions do not constitute a valid defense.
May 9, 2010 at 2:11 PM #548589Participant[quote=NewtoSanDiego]Another liberal Republican….Robert Bennett of Utah defeated.
We control the party now….Any questions[/quote]
Yes, I have a couple. Who’s “we”, and what is the “party” of which you speak?
Oh, and a third question: Your post that generated this thread reads “The following is the official Tea Party economic manifesto.” Which is the “official” tea party? My research turns up a multitude of groups, with differing philosopies and goals. I was not able to find your manifesto on any of them. Can you provide some additional info?
In light of recent exchanges with you, please consider what you factually KNOW about me before jumping to conclusions in your response. You obviously care a great deal about your political views, and, therefore, should have no reluctance or problem in defending them. However, name-calling and groundless presumptions do not constitute a valid defense.
May 9, 2010 at 2:11 PM #549071Participant[quote=NewtoSanDiego]Another liberal Republican….Robert Bennett of Utah defeated.
We control the party now….Any questions[/quote]
Yes, I have a couple. Who’s “we”, and what is the “party” of which you speak?
Oh, and a third question: Your post that generated this thread reads “The following is the official Tea Party economic manifesto.” Which is the “official” tea party? My research turns up a multitude of groups, with differing philosopies and goals. I was not able to find your manifesto on any of them. Can you provide some additional info?
In light of recent exchanges with you, please consider what you factually KNOW about me before jumping to conclusions in your response. You obviously care a great deal about your political views, and, therefore, should have no reluctance or problem in defending them. However, name-calling and groundless presumptions do not constitute a valid defense.
May 9, 2010 at 2:11 PM #549171Participant[quote=NewtoSanDiego]Another liberal Republican….Robert Bennett of Utah defeated.
We control the party now….Any questions[/quote]
Yes, I have a couple. Who’s “we”, and what is the “party” of which you speak?
Oh, and a third question: Your post that generated this thread reads “The following is the official Tea Party economic manifesto.” Which is the “official” tea party? My research turns up a multitude of groups, with differing philosopies and goals. I was not able to find your manifesto on any of them. Can you provide some additional info?
In light of recent exchanges with you, please consider what you factually KNOW about me before jumping to conclusions in your response. You obviously care a great deal about your political views, and, therefore, should have no reluctance or problem in defending them. However, name-calling and groundless presumptions do not constitute a valid defense.
May 9, 2010 at 2:11 PM #549449Participant[quote=NewtoSanDiego]Another liberal Republican….Robert Bennett of Utah defeated.
We control the party now….Any questions[/quote]
Yes, I have a couple. Who’s “we”, and what is the “party” of which you speak?
Oh, and a third question: Your post that generated this thread reads “The following is the official Tea Party economic manifesto.” Which is the “official” tea party? My research turns up a multitude of groups, with differing philosopies and goals. I was not able to find your manifesto on any of them. Can you provide some additional info?
In light of recent exchanges with you, please consider what you factually KNOW about me before jumping to conclusions in your response. You obviously care a great deal about your political views, and, therefore, should have no reluctance or problem in defending them. However, name-calling and groundless presumptions do not constitute a valid defense.
May 18, 2010 at 9:02 PM #551632NewtoSanDiego
GuestWe are the Tea Party!! You liberal swine
Rand Paul..Meet the new very likely Senator from the great state of Kentucky.
We control the Republican party now.
You don’t know anything about the tea party, you big spending, liberal, granola crunching, hemp wearing, atheist, hippie!
May 18, 2010 at 9:02 PM #551739GuestWe are the Tea Party!! You liberal swine
Rand Paul..Meet the new very likely Senator from the great state of Kentucky.
We control the Republican party now.
You don’t know anything about the tea party, you big spending, liberal, granola crunching, hemp wearing, atheist, hippie!
May 18, 2010 at 9:02 PM #552226GuestWe are the Tea Party!! You liberal swine
Rand Paul..Meet the new very likely Senator from the great state of Kentucky.
We control the Republican party now.
You don’t know anything about the tea party, you big spending, liberal, granola crunching, hemp wearing, atheist, hippie!
May 18, 2010 at 9:02 PM #552325GuestWe are the Tea Party!! You liberal swine
Rand Paul..Meet the new very likely Senator from the great state of Kentucky.
We control the Republican party now.
You don’t know anything about the tea party, you big spending, liberal, granola crunching, hemp wearing, atheist, hippie!
May 18, 2010 at 9:02 PM #552604GuestWe are the Tea Party!! You liberal swine
Rand Paul..Meet the new very likely Senator from the great state of Kentucky.
We control the Republican party now.
You don’t know anything about the tea party, you big spending, liberal, granola crunching, hemp wearing, atheist, hippie!
May 19, 2010 at 9:05 AM #551752blahblahblah
Participant[quote=NewtoSanDiego]We are the Tea Party!! You liberal swine
Rand Paul..Meet the new very likely Senator from the great state of Kentucky.
We control the Republican party now.
You don’t know anything about the tea party, you big spending, liberal, granola crunching, hemp wearing, atheist, hippie![/quote]
In spite of his nearly 20 point lead, you can expect a big turnout of mysterious “values voters” to appear at the election and upset Mr. Paul. His opponent, Trey Grayson is the Kentucky Secretary of State, and therefore the chief election official. Warm up those Diebold machines! Yeeha! Here come the “values voters” to save the day…
May 19, 2010 at 9:05 AM #551859Participant[quote=NewtoSanDiego]We are the Tea Party!! You liberal swine
Rand Paul..Meet the new very likely Senator from the great state of Kentucky.
We control the Republican party now.
You don’t know anything about the tea party, you big spending, liberal, granola crunching, hemp wearing, atheist, hippie![/quote]
In spite of his nearly 20 point lead, you can expect a big turnout of mysterious “values voters” to appear at the election and upset Mr. Paul. His opponent, Trey Grayson is the Kentucky Secretary of State, and therefore the chief election official. Warm up those Diebold machines! Yeeha! Here come the “values voters” to save the day…
May 19, 2010 at 9:05 AM #552346Participant[quote=NewtoSanDiego]We are the Tea Party!! You liberal swine
Rand Paul..Meet the new very likely Senator from the great state of Kentucky.
We control the Republican party now.
You don’t know anything about the tea party, you big spending, liberal, granola crunching, hemp wearing, atheist, hippie![/quote]
In spite of his nearly 20 point lead, you can expect a big turnout of mysterious “values voters” to appear at the election and upset Mr. Paul. His opponent, Trey Grayson is the Kentucky Secretary of State, and therefore the chief election official. Warm up those Diebold machines! Yeeha! Here come the “values voters” to save the day…
May 19, 2010 at 9:05 AM #552445Participant[quote=NewtoSanDiego]We are the Tea Party!! You liberal swine
Rand Paul..Meet the new very likely Senator from the great state of Kentucky.
We control the Republican party now.
You don’t know anything about the tea party, you big spending, liberal, granola crunching, hemp wearing, atheist, hippie![/quote]
In spite of his nearly 20 point lead, you can expect a big turnout of mysterious “values voters” to appear at the election and upset Mr. Paul. His opponent, Trey Grayson is the Kentucky Secretary of State, and therefore the chief election official. Warm up those Diebold machines! Yeeha! Here come the “values voters” to save the day…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.