- This topic has 65 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 31, 2009 at 12:47 AM #440261July 31, 2009 at 4:36 AM #4395014plexownerParticipant
Google “vitamin d3 flu”
from what I am reading vitamin D3 is one of the keys to immune system health – the current RDA of 400 iu per day is just enough to prevent rickets – for optimum health, which is what we will want this fall when the flu comes back, it sounds like 4000 to 5000 iu per day would be called for
~
if you get really interested in the flu and vaccines do some research on the 1918 flu and the pharmaceutical companies of the time – they made the vaccines for our soldiers in WWI – evidently there were many soldiers who never made it out of the states because they were debilitated by the vaccine – the war only lasted one year for the US and instead of letting the vaccines go to waste the pharma companies decided that the civilian population needed to be vaccinated because of the “foreign diseases” the troops were bringing home from the war – some of the articles I have read indicate that it was the vaccine that killed people and NOT the flu – blaming the deaths on “Spanish Influenza” kept the pharma companies from being blamed
think long and hard about letting the US pharmaceutical industry inject miscellaneous poisons and preservatives into your body this fall
July 31, 2009 at 4:36 AM #4400274plexownerParticipantGoogle “vitamin d3 flu”
from what I am reading vitamin D3 is one of the keys to immune system health – the current RDA of 400 iu per day is just enough to prevent rickets – for optimum health, which is what we will want this fall when the flu comes back, it sounds like 4000 to 5000 iu per day would be called for
~
if you get really interested in the flu and vaccines do some research on the 1918 flu and the pharmaceutical companies of the time – they made the vaccines for our soldiers in WWI – evidently there were many soldiers who never made it out of the states because they were debilitated by the vaccine – the war only lasted one year for the US and instead of letting the vaccines go to waste the pharma companies decided that the civilian population needed to be vaccinated because of the “foreign diseases” the troops were bringing home from the war – some of the articles I have read indicate that it was the vaccine that killed people and NOT the flu – blaming the deaths on “Spanish Influenza” kept the pharma companies from being blamed
think long and hard about letting the US pharmaceutical industry inject miscellaneous poisons and preservatives into your body this fall
July 31, 2009 at 4:36 AM #4400994plexownerParticipantGoogle “vitamin d3 flu”
from what I am reading vitamin D3 is one of the keys to immune system health – the current RDA of 400 iu per day is just enough to prevent rickets – for optimum health, which is what we will want this fall when the flu comes back, it sounds like 4000 to 5000 iu per day would be called for
~
if you get really interested in the flu and vaccines do some research on the 1918 flu and the pharmaceutical companies of the time – they made the vaccines for our soldiers in WWI – evidently there were many soldiers who never made it out of the states because they were debilitated by the vaccine – the war only lasted one year for the US and instead of letting the vaccines go to waste the pharma companies decided that the civilian population needed to be vaccinated because of the “foreign diseases” the troops were bringing home from the war – some of the articles I have read indicate that it was the vaccine that killed people and NOT the flu – blaming the deaths on “Spanish Influenza” kept the pharma companies from being blamed
think long and hard about letting the US pharmaceutical industry inject miscellaneous poisons and preservatives into your body this fall
July 31, 2009 at 4:36 AM #4397034plexownerParticipantGoogle “vitamin d3 flu”
from what I am reading vitamin D3 is one of the keys to immune system health – the current RDA of 400 iu per day is just enough to prevent rickets – for optimum health, which is what we will want this fall when the flu comes back, it sounds like 4000 to 5000 iu per day would be called for
~
if you get really interested in the flu and vaccines do some research on the 1918 flu and the pharmaceutical companies of the time – they made the vaccines for our soldiers in WWI – evidently there were many soldiers who never made it out of the states because they were debilitated by the vaccine – the war only lasted one year for the US and instead of letting the vaccines go to waste the pharma companies decided that the civilian population needed to be vaccinated because of the “foreign diseases” the troops were bringing home from the war – some of the articles I have read indicate that it was the vaccine that killed people and NOT the flu – blaming the deaths on “Spanish Influenza” kept the pharma companies from being blamed
think long and hard about letting the US pharmaceutical industry inject miscellaneous poisons and preservatives into your body this fall
July 31, 2009 at 4:36 AM #4402714plexownerParticipantGoogle “vitamin d3 flu”
from what I am reading vitamin D3 is one of the keys to immune system health – the current RDA of 400 iu per day is just enough to prevent rickets – for optimum health, which is what we will want this fall when the flu comes back, it sounds like 4000 to 5000 iu per day would be called for
~
if you get really interested in the flu and vaccines do some research on the 1918 flu and the pharmaceutical companies of the time – they made the vaccines for our soldiers in WWI – evidently there were many soldiers who never made it out of the states because they were debilitated by the vaccine – the war only lasted one year for the US and instead of letting the vaccines go to waste the pharma companies decided that the civilian population needed to be vaccinated because of the “foreign diseases” the troops were bringing home from the war – some of the articles I have read indicate that it was the vaccine that killed people and NOT the flu – blaming the deaths on “Spanish Influenza” kept the pharma companies from being blamed
think long and hard about letting the US pharmaceutical industry inject miscellaneous poisons and preservatives into your body this fall
July 31, 2009 at 6:16 AM #440105blahblahblahParticipantThis has been discussed here several times. First, some historical perspective — this has happened before. Here’s a 60 Minutes episode about the last time we were told the swine flu was going to kill thousands and we all had to get vaccinated:
In 1976 only one or two people died from the swine flu yet hundreds were permanently injured by the vaccine.
The regular flu kills 250,000 to 500,000 worldwide annually.
July 31, 2009 at 6:16 AM #439708blahblahblahParticipantThis has been discussed here several times. First, some historical perspective — this has happened before. Here’s a 60 Minutes episode about the last time we were told the swine flu was going to kill thousands and we all had to get vaccinated:
In 1976 only one or two people died from the swine flu yet hundreds were permanently injured by the vaccine.
The regular flu kills 250,000 to 500,000 worldwide annually.
July 31, 2009 at 6:16 AM #439506blahblahblahParticipantThis has been discussed here several times. First, some historical perspective — this has happened before. Here’s a 60 Minutes episode about the last time we were told the swine flu was going to kill thousands and we all had to get vaccinated:
In 1976 only one or two people died from the swine flu yet hundreds were permanently injured by the vaccine.
The regular flu kills 250,000 to 500,000 worldwide annually.
July 31, 2009 at 6:16 AM #440276blahblahblahParticipantThis has been discussed here several times. First, some historical perspective — this has happened before. Here’s a 60 Minutes episode about the last time we were told the swine flu was going to kill thousands and we all had to get vaccinated:
In 1976 only one or two people died from the swine flu yet hundreds were permanently injured by the vaccine.
The regular flu kills 250,000 to 500,000 worldwide annually.
July 31, 2009 at 6:16 AM #440032blahblahblahParticipantThis has been discussed here several times. First, some historical perspective — this has happened before. Here’s a 60 Minutes episode about the last time we were told the swine flu was going to kill thousands and we all had to get vaccinated:
In 1976 only one or two people died from the swine flu yet hundreds were permanently injured by the vaccine.
The regular flu kills 250,000 to 500,000 worldwide annually.
July 31, 2009 at 8:40 AM #439526ArrayaParticipantI have been following the flu since it started. A few things
1: This should not be compared to regular flu, It is a much different animal.
Regular flu affects 90% people over 65 that are sick already and the methods for calculating the number are just gestimates. To me it looks like a way to catagorize many deaths of old people with multiple problems. Apples and oranges.
2: H1N1 is most like the 1918 strain genetically. It is not like the 1976 scare.
3: It has penetrated the world population very quickly.
4: 1/3 of it’s victims are young and have no underlying condition. Pregnant women are most susceptible. 90% are under 65
5: It is mutating and has caused big problems in south america with hospitals being over run.
6: If it is going to be a major stress it will manifest this fall. The second wave of pandemics has been historically the most deadly than weaken after that.
7: At this point it does not bother me. However, it could be a major stress on the economy and our healthcare system if it evolves to something a little more deadly.
July 31, 2009 at 8:40 AM #440124ArrayaParticipantI have been following the flu since it started. A few things
1: This should not be compared to regular flu, It is a much different animal.
Regular flu affects 90% people over 65 that are sick already and the methods for calculating the number are just gestimates. To me it looks like a way to catagorize many deaths of old people with multiple problems. Apples and oranges.
2: H1N1 is most like the 1918 strain genetically. It is not like the 1976 scare.
3: It has penetrated the world population very quickly.
4: 1/3 of it’s victims are young and have no underlying condition. Pregnant women are most susceptible. 90% are under 65
5: It is mutating and has caused big problems in south america with hospitals being over run.
6: If it is going to be a major stress it will manifest this fall. The second wave of pandemics has been historically the most deadly than weaken after that.
7: At this point it does not bother me. However, it could be a major stress on the economy and our healthcare system if it evolves to something a little more deadly.
July 31, 2009 at 8:40 AM #439728ArrayaParticipantI have been following the flu since it started. A few things
1: This should not be compared to regular flu, It is a much different animal.
Regular flu affects 90% people over 65 that are sick already and the methods for calculating the number are just gestimates. To me it looks like a way to catagorize many deaths of old people with multiple problems. Apples and oranges.
2: H1N1 is most like the 1918 strain genetically. It is not like the 1976 scare.
3: It has penetrated the world population very quickly.
4: 1/3 of it’s victims are young and have no underlying condition. Pregnant women are most susceptible. 90% are under 65
5: It is mutating and has caused big problems in south america with hospitals being over run.
6: If it is going to be a major stress it will manifest this fall. The second wave of pandemics has been historically the most deadly than weaken after that.
7: At this point it does not bother me. However, it could be a major stress on the economy and our healthcare system if it evolves to something a little more deadly.
July 31, 2009 at 8:40 AM #440296ArrayaParticipantI have been following the flu since it started. A few things
1: This should not be compared to regular flu, It is a much different animal.
Regular flu affects 90% people over 65 that are sick already and the methods for calculating the number are just gestimates. To me it looks like a way to catagorize many deaths of old people with multiple problems. Apples and oranges.
2: H1N1 is most like the 1918 strain genetically. It is not like the 1976 scare.
3: It has penetrated the world population very quickly.
4: 1/3 of it’s victims are young and have no underlying condition. Pregnant women are most susceptible. 90% are under 65
5: It is mutating and has caused big problems in south america with hospitals being over run.
6: If it is going to be a major stress it will manifest this fall. The second wave of pandemics has been historically the most deadly than weaken after that.
7: At this point it does not bother me. However, it could be a major stress on the economy and our healthcare system if it evolves to something a little more deadly.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.