Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › $/sqft Comps
- This topic has 25 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by XBoxBoy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 9, 2008 at 9:05 PM #236635July 10, 2008 at 7:06 AM #236604stansdParticipant
I ran a regression on Rancho Bernardo awhile back. I don’t remember the exact numbers, but while the price per square foot was around $300 for houses in the area, the coefficient on square footage (marginal price per square foot) was only about $100.
Basically, there is a big ante to get any kind of a house, and the marginal cost of a bigger one is much lower for many of the reasons described above (I think income thresholds also play a role…lots of families making 100k, but many fewer making 120/150, etc….roughly, then, if a 1,500 square foot house is 500k, a 2,500 square foot house would run 600k…numbers aren’t perfect since I’m working from memory, but you get the idea.
Stan
July 10, 2008 at 7:06 AM #236800stansdParticipantI ran a regression on Rancho Bernardo awhile back. I don’t remember the exact numbers, but while the price per square foot was around $300 for houses in the area, the coefficient on square footage (marginal price per square foot) was only about $100.
Basically, there is a big ante to get any kind of a house, and the marginal cost of a bigger one is much lower for many of the reasons described above (I think income thresholds also play a role…lots of families making 100k, but many fewer making 120/150, etc….roughly, then, if a 1,500 square foot house is 500k, a 2,500 square foot house would run 600k…numbers aren’t perfect since I’m working from memory, but you get the idea.
Stan
July 10, 2008 at 7:06 AM #236786stansdParticipantI ran a regression on Rancho Bernardo awhile back. I don’t remember the exact numbers, but while the price per square foot was around $300 for houses in the area, the coefficient on square footage (marginal price per square foot) was only about $100.
Basically, there is a big ante to get any kind of a house, and the marginal cost of a bigger one is much lower for many of the reasons described above (I think income thresholds also play a role…lots of families making 100k, but many fewer making 120/150, etc….roughly, then, if a 1,500 square foot house is 500k, a 2,500 square foot house would run 600k…numbers aren’t perfect since I’m working from memory, but you get the idea.
Stan
July 10, 2008 at 7:06 AM #236742stansdParticipantI ran a regression on Rancho Bernardo awhile back. I don’t remember the exact numbers, but while the price per square foot was around $300 for houses in the area, the coefficient on square footage (marginal price per square foot) was only about $100.
Basically, there is a big ante to get any kind of a house, and the marginal cost of a bigger one is much lower for many of the reasons described above (I think income thresholds also play a role…lots of families making 100k, but many fewer making 120/150, etc….roughly, then, if a 1,500 square foot house is 500k, a 2,500 square foot house would run 600k…numbers aren’t perfect since I’m working from memory, but you get the idea.
Stan
July 10, 2008 at 7:06 AM #236734stansdParticipantI ran a regression on Rancho Bernardo awhile back. I don’t remember the exact numbers, but while the price per square foot was around $300 for houses in the area, the coefficient on square footage (marginal price per square foot) was only about $100.
Basically, there is a big ante to get any kind of a house, and the marginal cost of a bigger one is much lower for many of the reasons described above (I think income thresholds also play a role…lots of families making 100k, but many fewer making 120/150, etc….roughly, then, if a 1,500 square foot house is 500k, a 2,500 square foot house would run 600k…numbers aren’t perfect since I’m working from memory, but you get the idea.
Stan
July 10, 2008 at 9:39 AM #236718XBoxBoyParticipantThe value of square foot comps depends a lot on location. In a subdivision where the homes are mostly the same, sq ft comps are very relevant. In an area like La Jolla, where every house is different, and there are significant differences in the desirability of particular areas, the sq ft comps become much less relevant.
Looking at SDLookup.com for La Jolla, sfr’s PPSF varies from $305 to $5995 Obviously a huge varience. I don’t know enough about other areas to pick a good example of a zipcode with most houses being similar, so perhaps someone can provide a good example from Temecula or other area.
XBoxBoy
July 10, 2008 at 9:39 AM #236846XBoxBoyParticipantThe value of square foot comps depends a lot on location. In a subdivision where the homes are mostly the same, sq ft comps are very relevant. In an area like La Jolla, where every house is different, and there are significant differences in the desirability of particular areas, the sq ft comps become much less relevant.
Looking at SDLookup.com for La Jolla, sfr’s PPSF varies from $305 to $5995 Obviously a huge varience. I don’t know enough about other areas to pick a good example of a zipcode with most houses being similar, so perhaps someone can provide a good example from Temecula or other area.
XBoxBoy
July 10, 2008 at 9:39 AM #236857XBoxBoyParticipantThe value of square foot comps depends a lot on location. In a subdivision where the homes are mostly the same, sq ft comps are very relevant. In an area like La Jolla, where every house is different, and there are significant differences in the desirability of particular areas, the sq ft comps become much less relevant.
Looking at SDLookup.com for La Jolla, sfr’s PPSF varies from $305 to $5995 Obviously a huge varience. I don’t know enough about other areas to pick a good example of a zipcode with most houses being similar, so perhaps someone can provide a good example from Temecula or other area.
XBoxBoy
July 10, 2008 at 9:39 AM #236903XBoxBoyParticipantThe value of square foot comps depends a lot on location. In a subdivision where the homes are mostly the same, sq ft comps are very relevant. In an area like La Jolla, where every house is different, and there are significant differences in the desirability of particular areas, the sq ft comps become much less relevant.
Looking at SDLookup.com for La Jolla, sfr’s PPSF varies from $305 to $5995 Obviously a huge varience. I don’t know enough about other areas to pick a good example of a zipcode with most houses being similar, so perhaps someone can provide a good example from Temecula or other area.
XBoxBoy
July 10, 2008 at 9:39 AM #236915XBoxBoyParticipantThe value of square foot comps depends a lot on location. In a subdivision where the homes are mostly the same, sq ft comps are very relevant. In an area like La Jolla, where every house is different, and there are significant differences in the desirability of particular areas, the sq ft comps become much less relevant.
Looking at SDLookup.com for La Jolla, sfr’s PPSF varies from $305 to $5995 Obviously a huge varience. I don’t know enough about other areas to pick a good example of a zipcode with most houses being similar, so perhaps someone can provide a good example from Temecula or other area.
XBoxBoy
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.